| Act of Parliament | |
 | |
| Long title | An Act to make provision about the courts and their procedure and practice; about judges and magistrates; about fines and the enforcement processes of the courts; about periodical payments of damages; and for connected purposes. |
|---|---|
| Citation | 2003 c. 39 |
| Territorial extent | England and Wales; Scotland; Northern Ireland |
| Dates | |
| Royal assent | 20 November 2003 |
| Other legislation | |
| Repeals/revokes | Justices of the Peace Act 1997 |
| Amended by | Crime and Courts Act 2013, Courts and Tribunals Act 2018, Domestic Abuse Act 2021, Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act 2022 |
Status: Amended | |
| Text of statute as originally enacted | |
| Text of the Courts Act 2003 as in force today (including any amendments) within the United Kingdom, from legislation.gov.uk. | |
The Courts Act 2003 (c.39) is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom implementing many of the recommendations in Sir Robin Auld's (a Court of Appeal judge) Review of the Criminal Courts in England and Wales (also known as the "Auld Review"). The White Paper which preceded the Act was published by the Home Office on the 17 July 2002 and called "Justice for All".
The Act has nine parts:[1]
- Maintenance of the court system
- Justices of the Peace
- Magistrates' courts
- Court security
- Inspectors of court administration
- Judges
- Procedure rules and practice directions
- Miscellaneous
- Final provisions (technical provisions)
The Act deals predominantly with criminal courts' administration, though certain sections deal with civil matters (notably creating a post of "Head of Civil Justice", enabling provisions for family procedure rules, and amendments to its civil procedure equivalent).
The Act also abolished magistrates' courts committees, combining the magistrates' courts' administration with the Court Service, which was then renamed Her Majesty's Courts Service. "Fines Officers" are instituted in order to strengthen the system for collecting fines after the existing system was criticised for relative ineffectiveness. Schedule 1 of the Act provided for the establishment of courts boards.[2]
Sections 50 to 57 of this act also provide court security officers the power of search, seizure/retention of items, restraint and removal from court when performing their duties.
The act also transfers the authority and obligation of high sheriffs, in relation to civil writs, to sheriff's officers; previously, high sheriffs had delegated these to the sheriff's officers, in any case, but the Blair Ministry preferred to make this explicit, and remove the theoretical power of the high sheriff. It also renames this more-than-1000-year-old role - the sheriff's officer - to High court enforcement officers, for reasons that have not been explained, except perhaps to give it a modern-sounding name.