This article relies excessively on references to primary sources. Please improve this article by adding secondary or tertiary sources. Find sources: "DailyTech" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (January 2012) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
DailyTech
Type of site
Technology daily publication
OwnerDailyTech, LLC
Created byKristopher Kubicki
EditorJason Mick[citation needed]
URLhttp://www.dailytech.com (archived)
CommercialYes
Launched2005
Current statusDefunct

DailyTech was an online daily publication of technology news, founded by ex-AnandTech editor Kristopher Kubicki on January 1, 2005.[citation needed] The site featured a prominent "comments" section that acted as the forums for the publication. Users were able to moderate or respond to each post, a template the editor admitted borrowing from Slashdot. The operating revenue for DailyTech was primarily dependent on advertising, with syndication of their news feed also providing some revenue.

Overview

The schism between DailyTech and AnandTech occurred in goodwill, with the goal of establishing DailyTech as a news site that would not be bound by the NDAs that AnandTech has signed. Anand Lal Shimpi is frequently quoted and featured on DailyTech; however, the two publications compete against each other for readership.[1] The DailyTech news feed is also used by other technology and science websites.

As of early December 2015 the website appeared to be inactive, although there was no notice of a change in status. Activity resumed in 2016, but as of May 2021, the web site is no longer available; archives show the last posted article was in late 2017.

Writing style

DailyTech combined blog-style news with industry interviews and frequent roadmap leaks. The DailyTech editor had a frequent history of run-ins with writers from other publications. He has publicly denounced the writings from competitor Tom's Hardware,[2] Gizmodo,[3] HardOCP,[4] The Inquirer[5] and DigiTimes.[6]

DailyTech consistently leaked several generations of GPUs and CPUs. The company attributed this to the standing instruction that DailyTech writers were not allowed to sign disclosure agreements or embargoes.[7]

On June 5, 2007, the site published a report on the levels of corruption present at other technology news and review websites. 7 out of 35 site polled accepted some kind of advertising-for-content exchange.[8][9][10]

References

  1. ^ "DailyTech Editor-in-Chief mission statement". Archived from the original on 2007-08-11. Retrieved 2007-06-11.
  2. ^ Olsen, Sven. "Core Duo Battery Drain Bug Demystified". Archived from the original on 2006-05-16. Retrieved 2007-06-11.
  3. ^ Kubicki, Kristopher. "On Whining and Embargoes". Archived from the original on 2007-08-31. Retrieved 2007-08-30.
  4. ^ Kubicki, Kristopher. "To Name or Not to Name?". Archived from the original on 2007-06-18.
  5. ^ Huynh, Anh T. ""Rydermark" Cheating Allegations Discreted". Archived from the original on 2007-03-12. Retrieved 2007-06-11.
  6. ^ Kubicki, Kristopher. "DailyTech Digest: Radeon HD Defect Feedback Demystified". Archived from the original on 2007-09-30. Retrieved 2007-08-18.
  7. ^ Kubicki, Kristopher. "DailyTech does not sign NDAs". Archived from the original on 2011-08-09. Retrieved 2007-06-11.
  8. ^ Wasson, Scott. "DailyTech tracks payola in hardware review sites". TheTechReport.
  9. ^ Kubicki, Kristopher. "Pay to Play: Uncovering Online Payola". Archived from the original on December 31, 2017. Retrieved May 15, 2019.
  10. ^ Gunn, Aneglina (September 8, 2010). "DailyTech: Reviewing tech-journalism ethics". USAToday. Archived from the original on 2008-02-10.

External links

Categories