This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages)
This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.Find sources: "Disjunctive normal form" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (November 2010) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
This article includes a list of references, related reading, or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. Please help to improve this article by introducing more precise citations. (November 2010) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
(Learn how and when to remove this template message)

In boolean logic, a **disjunctive normal form** (**DNF**) is a canonical normal form of a logical formula consisting of a disjunction of conjunctions; it can also be described as an **OR of ANDs**, a sum of products, or (in philosophical logic) a *cluster concept*.^{[citation needed]} As a normal form, it is useful in automated theorem proving.

A logical formula is considered to be in DNF if it is a disjunction of one or more conjunctions of one or more literals.^{[1]}^{: 153 } A DNF formula is in **full disjunctive normal form** if each of its variables appears exactly once in every conjunction. As in conjunctive normal form (CNF), the only propositional operators in DNF are and (), or (), and not (). The *not* operator can only be used as part of a literal, which means that it can only precede a propositional variable.

The following is a context-free grammar for DNF:

*DNF*→ (*Conjunction*)*DNF**DNF*→ (*Conjunction*)*Conjunction*→*Literal**Conjunction**Conjunction*→*Literal**Literal*→*Variable**Literal*→*Variable*

Where *Variable* is any variable.

For example, all of the following formulas are in DNF:

However, the following formulas are **not** in DNF:

- , since an OR is nested within a NOT
- , since an AND is nested within a NOT
- , since an OR is nested within an AND

The formula is in DNF, but not in full DNF; an equivalent full-DNF version is .

Converting a formula to DNF involves using logical equivalences, such as double negation elimination, De Morgan's laws, and the distributive law.

All logical formulas can be converted into an equivalent disjunctive normal form.^{[1]}^{: 152–153 } However, in some cases conversion to DNF can lead to an exponential explosion of the formula. For example, converting the formula to DNF yields a formula with 2^{n} terms.

Every particular Boolean function can be represented by one and only one^{[note 1]} *full* disjunctive normal form, one of the canonical forms. In contrast, two different *plain* disjunctive normal forms may denote the same Boolean function; see the illustrations.

The Boolean satisfiability problem on conjunctive normal form formulas is NP-hard; by the duality principle, so is the falsifiability problem on DNF formulas. Therefore, it is co-NP-hard to decide if a DNF formula is a tautology.

Conversely, a DNF formula is satisfiable if, and only if, one of its conjunctions is satisfiable; this can be decided in polynomial time.^{[2]}

An important variation used in the study of computational complexity is *k-DNF*. A formula is in *k-DNF* if it is in DNF and each conjunction contains at most k literals.