Submission declined on 26 April 2023 by Mattdaviesfsic (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Declined by Mattdaviesfsic 14 months ago. Last edited by Liz 12 days ago. Reviewer: Inform author. Resubmit Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

Submission declined on 24 December 2022 by Timtrent (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Timtrent 18 months ago.

• Comment: "Her public scholarship has appeared in HuffPost,[6], The Independent,[7] the Marginalia Review of Books,[8] and Centre for the Study of Apocalpytic and Millenarian Movements (CenSAMM).[9]" is lazy writing.what do the references say about Rollens? Why is the enormous list of publications still present? 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 10:04, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

• Comment: See comment from Timtrent, still not fixed. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 07:35, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

• Comment: Your job is to show that she passes one of our notability criteria. We're not at all concerned about having a huge list of works she has created. Assuming her to be notable then Wikidata will take care of that 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:37, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

Sarah E. Rollens is a scholar of religion. Trained at the University of Toronto's Centre for the Study of Religion in the early 2010s, she is currently an Associate Professor of Religious Studies at Rhodes College.^[1] Holder of the R.A. Webb Chair of Religious Studies at Rhodes College. She previously taught as an Instructor in the Department of Religious Studies at the University of Alabama.

Although also recognized as a specialist on early Christian texts, her broader interests include Christian origins, social theory, scribalism, identity formation, the ancient Mediterranean world, and the Synoptic gospels.

She is the executive editor for the Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus.^[2] She is also the book review editor of Studies in Religion.^[3]. She sits on numerous editorial boards for international journals, including New Testament Studies, Journal for Interdisciplinary Biblical Studies,^[4], and Annali di Storia dell'Esegesi.^[5]

Her public scholarship has appeared in HuffPost,^[6], The Independent,^[7] the Marginalia Review of Books,^[8] and Centre for the Study of Apocalpytic and Millenarian Movements (CenSAMM).^[9]

Works by Sarah E. Rollens

• “Paul, 1 Thessalonians”, in: Brill Encyclopedia of Early Christianity Online, General Editor David G. Hunter, Paul J.J. van Geest, Bert Jan Lietaert Peerbolte. Brill Academic, 2022.^[10]
• “Partaking in the Great Supper of God: Figuring Birds in the Apocalypse of John”, in Worth More Than Many Sparrows: Essays in Honor of Willi Braun, edited by Sarah Rollens and Patrick Hart, 13–30. Equinox, 2022.
• “An Inconsistent Truth? Reflections on Tucker Ferda’s Jesus, the Gospels, and the Galilean Crisis”, in Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus 20 (2022) 87–109.
• “Abject Objects: The Lives and Times of Early Christian Material Culture”, in Harvard Theolorical Review 115:2 (2022) 294–307.
• “Rethinking the Early Christian Mission” in The Gospels and their Receptions: Festschrift Joseph Verheyden edited by H.J. de Jonge, M. Grundeken, John S. Kloppenborg, C.M. Tuckett, 557–558. Peeters, 2022.
• “Violent Imaginaries in the Synoptic Gospels”, in The Oxford Handbook to the Synoptic Gospels edited by Stephen Ahearne-Kroll, 260–277. Oxford University Press, 2022.
• “Conflict and Honor in the Ancient Epistle: Or, How an Egyptian Funerary Association Illuminates Rivalry at Corinth”, in Greco-Roman Associations, Deities, and Early Christianity edited by Bruce W. Longenecker, 309–324. Baylor University Press, 2022.
• “Other People’s Speech in Q” in On Using Sources in Graeco-Roman, Jewish and Early Christian Literature edited by J. Verheyden, John S. Kloppenborg, G. Roskam, S. Schorn, 321–350. Peeters, 2022.
• “Two ‘Un-Scientific’ Concepts in the Study of Christian Origins” in Non uno itinere: Ebraismi, cristianesimi, modernità: Studi in onore di Mauro Pesce in occasione del suo ottantesimo compleanno edited by M. Rescio, 108–116. Brescia, 2021.
• with Anthony Le Donne, “The Historical Jesus” in The Cambridge Companion to the New Testament edited by Patrick Gray. Cambridge University Press, 2021.
• "Sayings Source Q", in Critical Dictionary of Apocalyptic and Millenarian Movements edited by James Crossley and Alastair Lockhart. 2021.
• “It’s Reception All the Way Down: A Review of The Reception of Jesus in the First Three Centuries”, in Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses. 2020.
• “Notes on the Historical Paul and His Intellectual Activity”, in Ancient Jew Review 2020.^[11]
• “Socialscapes and Abstractions: An Appraisal of Richard A. Horsley’s Theorizing of Antiquity” in Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus 18 (2020): 101–123.
• with Meredith Warren and Eric Vanden Eykel. “Confronting Judeophobia in the Classroom” in Journal for the Institute of the Interdisciplinary Biblical Studies 2.1 (2020).
• “What Does Theory Have to Do with Archaeology? Envisaging Social Conflict in Ancient Galilee” in Biblical Archaeology Review Fall 2020.
• “Where Are All the Women in Q Studies?: Gender Demographics and the Study of Q” in The Q Hypothesis Unveiled: Theological, Sociological, and Hermeneutical Issues behind the Sayings Source edited by Markus Tiwald, 224–255. Kohlhammer Press, 2020.
• “The Viability of Materialist Approaches to Persecution: Revelation as a Test Case”, in Annali di Storia dell’Esegesi 36.1 (2019) 71–89.
• “The Sayings Gospel Q”, in T & T Clark Jesus Library. 2019.^[12]
• “Troubling the Retainer Class”, in Class Struggle in the New Testament edited by Robert Myles, 169–90. Lexington Books, 2019.
• “If Discourse is All There Is: On Studying Religion in the Ancient Context”, Bulletin for the Study of Religion 47:2 (2018): 8–10.
• “The God Came to Me in a Dream: Epiphanies in Voluntary Associations as a Context for Paul’s Vision of Christ”, in Harvard Theological Review 111.1 (2018): 41–65.
• “The Anachronism of ‘Early Christian Communities’” in Theorizing ‘Religion’ in Antiquity edited by Nickolas Roubekas, 307–324. Equinox, 2018.
• “From Birth Pangs to Dismembered Limbs: The Anthropology of Bodily Violence in the Gospel of Mark” in The Gospels and Their Stories in Anthropological Perspective edited by John S. Kloppenborg and Joseph Verheyden, 53–68. Mohr Siebeck, 2018.
• “The Kingdom of God is Among You: Prospects for a Q Community” in Christian Origins and the Establishment of the Early Jesus Movement edited by Stanley E. Porter and Andrew W. Pitts, 224–241. Brill, 2018.
• “Q in Matthew: A Review Essay” in The Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus 15.2–3 (2017): 169–91.
• “Q in Context and Comparison: A Response to Choi, Foster, and Arzt-Grabner” in Annali di storia dellʼesegesi 34.1 (2017): 257–63.
• “Inventing Tradition in Thessalonica: The Appropriation of the Past in 1 Thessalonians 2:14–16” inBiblical Theology Bulletin 46.3 (2016): 123–132.
• “Canons, Communities, and Christian Origins: A Response to the AJR Canon Forum”, in Ancient Jew Review. 2016.
• “Why We Have Failed to Theorize Scribes in Antiquity” in Scribal Practices and Social Structures Among Jesus’ Adherents. Essays in Honour of John S. Kloppenborg 117–133. Peeters, 2016.
• “Persecution in the Social Setting of Q” in Q in Context II: Social Setting and Archaeological Background of the Sayings Source edited by Markus Tiwald, 149–164. Bonn University Press, 2015.
• Framing Social Criticism in the Jesus Movement: The Ideological Project in the Sayings Gospel Q. Mohr Siebeck, 2014.
• with Richard Last. “Accounting Practices in P.Tebt. III/2 894 and Pauline Groups”, Early Christianity 5.4 (2014): 441–74.
• “Conceptualizing Justice in Q: Narrative and Context” in Metaphor and Narrative in Q edited by Ruben Zimmerman, Michael Labahn, and Dieter Roth, 96–106. Mohr Siebeck, 2013.
• “The Rewards of Redescription: An Assessment of Burton Mack’s Influence on the Study of Christian Origins” in Theory and Method in the Study of Religion: Twenty-Five Years On edited by Aaron Hughes, 69–74. Brill, 2013.
• "“The Identity of Q in the First Century: Reproducing a Theological Narrative” in Failure and Nerve in the Study of Religion: Working with Donald Wiebe, edited by William E. Arnal, Willi Braun, Russell T. McCutcheon, 177–191. Equinox, 2012.
• “Does ‘Q’ Have Any Representative Potential?” Method & Theory in the Study of Religion 23.1 (2011): 64–79.
• “‘Why Do You Not Judge for Yourselves What Is Right?’: A Consideration of the Synoptic Relationship between Mt 5,25–26 and Lk 12,57–59”, Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses 86.4 (2010): 449–469.
• with Herbert Berg. "The Historical Muhammad and the Historical Jesus: A Comparison of Scholarly Reinventions and Reinterpretations". Studies in Religion / Sciences Religieuses, 32.2 (2008): 271–292.