ojp Described as "The ancestor of modern Japanese. 7th–10th centuries AD." The more usual date for the change from Old Japanese to Middle Japanese is ca. 800 (end of the Nara era).
Early Middle Japanese (中古日本語, Chūko-Nihongo)[1] is a stage of the Japanese language between 794 and 1185, which is known as the Heian period (平安時代). The successor to Old Japanese (上代日本語), it is also known as Late Old Japanese. However, the term "Early Middle Japanese" is preferred, as it is closer to Late Middle Japanese (中世日本語, after 1185) than to Old Japanese (before 794).
Background
This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (May 2008)
Old Japanese had borrowed and adapted the Chinese script to write Japanese. In Early Middle Japanese, two new scripts emerged: the kana scripts hiragana and katakana. That development simplified writing and brought about a new age in literature, with many classics such as The Tale of Genji, The Tale of the Bamboo Cutter, and The Tales of Ise.
Writing system
Early Middle Japanese was written in three different ways. It was first recorded in Man'yōgana (万葉仮名), literally "ten thousand leaves borrowed labels", in reference to the Man'yōshū poetry anthology and the "borrowing" of the kanji characters as "labels" for the sounds of Japanese. Certain Chinese characters were borrowed to phonetically spell out Japanese sounds. Cursive handwriting gradually gave rise to the hiragana (平仮名, "flat/simple borrowed labels") and Buddhist shorthand practices of using pieces of kanji to denote the sounds then developed into the katakana (片仮名, "partial/piece borrowed labels").
It is worth noting that the man'yōgana in each cell only indicates one possible option for spelling each Japanese mora – in the table above, each chosen character is the direct origin of the corresponding modern hiragana. See also Hentaigana for a fuller description of how multiple hiragana could be used to spell a single sound. Also note that hiragana forms were not standardized at that time.[2]
Although man'yōgana specify different kanji to represent voiced phonemes versus unvoiced phonemes, it is not until the Meiji period that we see standardized usage of the dakuten diacritic ゛ to explicitly mark voicing for hiragana and katakana.
Japan officially adopted simplified shinjitai (新字体, "new character forms") in 1946 as part of a round of orthographic reforms intended to improve literacy rates. The so-called kyūjitai (旧字体, "old character forms") are equivalent to Traditional Chinese characters, and these forms were the ones used in historical man'yōgana. Modern transcriptions of classical texts are predominantly written in shinjitai. To avoid unnecessary ambiguity, quotes from classical texts would be written in kyūjitai.
Additionally, there are many spelling differences between Modern Japanese and Early Middle Japanese even for the same word. For example, 万葉集 is spelled in modern Japanese hiragana as まんようしゅう (man'yōshū), while in Early Middle Japanese, this would have been まんえふしふ (man'yefushifu). Details on these spelling rules are helpful for understanding historical kana usage.
Phonology
Developments
Major phonological changes were characteristic of the period.
The most prominent difference was the loss of certain spelling distinctions found in the Jōdai Tokushu Kanazukai ("Ancient Special Kana Usage"), which distinguished two types of /i/, /e/, and /o/. While these distinctions had begun to blur already at the end of the Old Japanese stage, they were completely lost in Early Middle Japanese. The final distinction to be lost was /ko1, go1/ vs. /ko2, go2/.[3] For example, around the year 800 in very early Early Middle Japanese, in the same text /ko1/ was still represented by cursive 「古」, while /ko2/ was represented by cursive 「已」.[4]
In the 10th century, /e/ and /je/ progressively merged into /je/, and /o/ and /wo/ had merged into /wo/ by the 11th century.[5][6][7]
An increase in Chinese loanwords had a number of phonological effects:
Introduction of palatal[8] and labial[9] consonant clusters such as /kw/ and /kj/
The development of the uvular nasal and geminated consonants occurred late in the Heian period and brought about the introduction of closed syllables (CVC).[10]
Theories for the realization of /s,z/ include [s,z], [ts,dz], and [ɕ,ʑ]. It may have varied depending on the following vowel, as in Modern Japanese.[citation needed]
/ɸ/
By the 11th century, /ɸ/ had merged with /w/ between vowels.[11]
Grammar
This article or section uses color as the only way to convey important information. To meet Wikipedia's web accessibility guidelines, please help improve this article or section so it is easier to read by those with disabilities by adding an additional means for these readers to access the relevant information. See the guides to editing for accessibility at contrast and colors. (17/11/2023)
English translation: Long before the present, it is said that there was someone called Old Man Bamboo Cutter.
It is to be noted that the noun「昔」("long past") is actually a predicate (means "is long past"). The predicate is not necessarily a verb in Early Middle Japanese.
Phrase (文節): The smallest unit naturally divided from the rest of a sentence by its meaning.
今は
昔
、
竹取の
翁と
いふ
者
ありけり
。
The function of the auxiliary particle「は」is to highlight the noun「今」(now), which cannot be separately explained, so they should be in the same phrase. Similarly, the particle 「の 」 represents the relation between the modifier「竹取」("bamboo cutter", a compound noun) and the modified noun 「翁」(old man), like the preposition "of". Additionally, the particle 「と」 connects the called name 「翁」(modified by 「竹取」) to the verb「いふ」( "call"), just like a preposition. As for the auxiliary verb「けり」, it further clarifies that what the verb「あり」 ("be, exist") describes is a rumor about the past, but not a direct experience (i.e. 間接過去), so it should be included in the same phrase as 「あり」. In contrast, even if the verb 「いふ」 does modify the noun「者」 ("someone"), its meaning can still be realized naturally without any help from other words.
Word (単語): The smallest grammatical unit.
今
は
昔
、
竹取
の
翁
と
いふ
者
あり
けり
。
Although 「竹取」is a combination of the noun 「竹」and the verb 「取り」("get", infinitive), any compound noun, verb, or adjective should be considered as a single grammatical unit.
Classes of words
Words were classified as follows:
Cannot stand alone as a phrase
(Auxiliary) particle (助 詞): Without inflection. Has various functions like emphasis, acting like a postposition, hinting about the subject or expressing interrogative mood.
Auxiliary verb (助動 詞): With inflection. Describes additional information of Yougen like tense, aspect, mood, voice, and polarity. Alternate descriptions include grammaticalized verb or Verb-like ending.
Can stand alone as phrase
Without inflection
Cannot be subject
Adverb(副 詞): mainly modifies Yougen.
Conjunction (接続詞)
Interjection (感動詞)
Rentaisi (連体詞): mainly modifies Taigen.
Can be subject: Taigen (体言, the words that are the main body of the sentence)
Noun (名 詞)
Pronoun (代 名 詞)
Number (数 詞)
With inflection: Yougen (用言, the words to predicate or to "use" other words)
Adjective verb (形容動 詞): a different kind of "adjective", which is derived from a noun. Hence also referred to as adjectival noun in English.
Auxiliary particle
(Auxiliary) Particles had various functions, and they can be classified as follows:
Class of particle
Functions
Example
(Particle is labeled in red.)
Case particles 格助詞
indicating the relationship between a phrase and its following phrase.
(i.e. not limited to nouns, so slightly differs from "case" in English)
いづ
方へか
罷りぬる
(The Tale of Genji) In which direction of escape has gone (the bird)?
(The verb 「罷る」 is the polite form, i.e.「丁寧語」, of the verb 「行く」"go")
Conjunctive particles 接続助詞
indicating the relationship between clauses.
文を書きてやれども返り事もせず。(The Tale of the Bamboo Cutter) Even though「文を書きてやれ」, but 「返り事もせず」. (「ども」has to be preceded by the realis mood, e.g.,「やれ」is the realis mood of the verb「やる」,
to express the appropriate meaning.)
Adverbial particles 副助詞
mainly modifying its following yougen.
ただ浪の白きのみぞ見ゆる (Tosa Nikki) ...can only see (exactly) the white wave (actually, 「のみ」 limits the expressive range of 「見ゆる」) (The verb 「見ゆ」is "bound" by the binding particle 「ぞ」, so it occurs in the attributive form「見ゆる」.)
Binding particles 係助詞
emphasizing its phrase or making it interrogative, and limiting the inflection
form of the ending yougen or auxiliary verb.
いづ
方へか
罷りぬる
In which direction of escape has gone (the bird)? (The perfect auxiliary verb「ぬ」is "bound" by the binding particle 「か」, so it occurs in the attributive form 「ぬる」.)
Final particles 終助詞
mainly at the end of sentence, indicating many kinds of moods
(e.g. interrogative mood, emotive assertion)
我はこの比惡きぞかし(Sarashina Nikki) At that time I'm definitely not good! (Although the binding particle 「ぞ」 is at the end of sentence, it still requires its preceding words to be attributive.)
Interjectory particles 間投助詞
similar to final particle, but occurs more freely, and is often
「が」 (ga) and 「の」 (no) : "of, ...'s". It hints the present of subject, relation of modification between phrases or nouns.
「を」(wo) (accusative). Optional.
「に」(ni) (dative/locative). It had a wide range of functions ('to' or 'for' a person; 'by' an agent'; 'at' or 'to' a place; 'at' a time), and in some uses, especially when indicating time, it was optional.
「より」(yori) (ablative).
「まで」(made) (terminative: 'until'; 'as far as').
「と」(to) (comitative: 'with'; essive 'as').
「へ」(fe) (allative: 'to'). 「へ」 was derived from the noun「 邊」'vicinity; direction', which 「わ」 occasionally found in the location noun structure Noun + 「の」 + Location Noun to mean 'near', or in the noun-deriving suffix 「べ」 (< 「のへ」) in such words as 水べ 'beside the water' .
The nominative function was marked by the absence of a particle in main clauses and by the genitive particles in subordinate clauses. The dative/locative particle -ni was homophonous with the simple infinitive form of the copula -ni, with verbal suffixes supplies more complex case markers -ni-te ('at' a place) and -ni si-te or -ni-te ('by means of'). A number of particle + verb + -te sequences provided other case functions: -ni yori-te 'due to' (from yor- 'depend'), -ni tuki-te 'about, concerning' (from tuk- 'be attached'), and -to si-te 'as' (from se- 'do'). More complex structures were derived from genitive particle + Location Noun + appropriate case particle (typically locative -ni) and were used particularly to express spatial and temporal relations. Major location nouns were mafe 'front' (Noun-no mafe-ni 'in front of Noun'), ufe 'top' (Noun-no ufe-ni 'on top of Noun' ~ 'above Noun'), sita 'under' (Noun-no sita-ni 'under Noun), saki 'ahead' (Noun-no saki-ni 'ahead of Noun)', etc.
Conjunctive particle
Infinitive + 「て」(te): 'and (then/so), when, because'. It usually expressed a close sequential link between the predicates that it connects. The subjects of the two verbs connected by「て」 were usually the same.
Realis + 「ば」(ba): 'and (then/so), when, because'. It usually expressed a looser sequential link between the predicates that it connected. The subject of both verbs connected by 「ば」 was usually different.
Irrealis + 「ば」(ba): 'if...', It usually expressed a unreal condition.
Irrealis + 「で」(de):[12] negative 'and', 'without ... ing', 'rather than ... ', derived from old infinitive of negative auxiliary verb「ず」(i.e. 「に」) + the particle 「て」with sound change.
Various forms + 「と/とも」 (do /domo): 'even if, even though'. Most yougens and auxiliary verbs took the conclusive form, bigrade verbs take the infinitive in earlier texts, r-irregular verbs took the attributive form,and some auxiliary verbs inflecting like adjective and negative auxiliary verbs「ず」also took the attributive.
Infinitive + 「つつ」 (tutu): 'while (at the same time)'.
Infinitive of verb / stem of adjective + 「ながら」(nagara): 'while, while still' or 'despite'.
Binding particle
There were some special particles that limited the inflectional form of the yougen or auxiliary verb at the end of a sentence. These particles are called binding particles(係助詞). These limitations are called binding rules(係り結びの法則).
Note that the case particle「と」indicates a preceding quote, and when it is used, a quote should be considered an independent sentence when using the linking rule.
Susumu Ōno assumed that these binding particles originally acted as final particles.[13] For example:
Notice that 「来る」 is attributive(Due to the modification to the noun 「雨」). According to Susumu Ōno's assumption, if we want to emphasize the noun in question(i.e.「雨」), we can invert the whole sentence as the following:
雨か降り来る
Obviously, this gives birth to the binding rule. Since other binding particles can also be considered final particles in Old Japanese, this assumption is reasonable.
Verbs
Early Middle Japanese verb inflection was agglutinative. Most verbs were conjugated in 6 forms and could be combined with auxiliary verbs to express tense, aspect, mood, voice, and polarity. Several of the auxiliary verbs could be combined in a string, and each component determined the choice of form of the preceding component.
In Japanese there are many different yougens with the same pronunciation, or the same yougen has various meanings. To distinguish, modern transliteration uses Kanji to highlight these differences. For example, the Upper bigrade verbs「慣る」means "get used to", but its also means "become familiar" which is represented by「馴る」. Meanwhile, the quadrigrade verb「成る」has the same pronunciation with 「慣る」but it actually means "become".
Conjugation
Early Middle Japanese inherited all eight verbal conjugations class from Old Japanese and added new one: Lower Monograde, but there's only 「蹴る」("kick by foot") classified as Lower Monograde in Early Middle Japanese.
Early Middle Japanese Verbs were divided into 5 class of regular conjugations:
*Noted that most S-irregular is the combination of a noun and 「爲」, for example, 「期す」 is a combination of the noun 「期」 ('date') and 「爲」.
The 「よ」 at the end of the imperative forms is optional, although exceedingly common.
The system of 9 conjugation classes appears to be complex. However, all nine conjugations can be subsumed into variations of two groups:
the consonant-root verbs (quadrigrade, N-irregular and R-irregular verbs)
the vowel-root verbs (others)
The irregularity of N-irregular verbs occurred only in the conclusive and the attributive, and as there are no quadrigrade verbs with n-roots, quadrigrade and N-irregular verb patterns may be treated as being in complementary distribution.[14] Vowel-root verbs consist of bigrade verbs (the majority), a few monograde verbs (especially 見る 'see' and 居る 'sit'), the K-irregular verb 来 'come', and the S-irregular verb se- 'do' (or -ze- in some compounds).[15] The difference between 'upper' and 'lower' bigrade or monograde verbs is whether the vowel at the end of the root was i or e. The difference between bigrade and monograde was whether in the conclusive, attributive, and realis, the initial u of the ending elided the vowel of the root or the vowel of the roots elides the initial u of the ending.
There are some questions about this arrangement of forms:[16]
The irrealis is not used as an independent verb form: it must be followed by an auxiliary.
That said, there is a limited set of nouns appearing in Old Japanese and ending in -a, that appear to overlap phonetically and semantically with the irrealis form of certain verbs. These could be analyzed as resultative deverbal nouns.
The classical passive auxiliary verb 「る」 (「ゆ」in Old Japanese) attaches to the irrealis stem with an -a ending (i.e. quadrigrade, N-irregular and R-irregular), while the other classical passive auxiliary 「らる」 (「らゆ」in Old Japanese) attaches to the irrealis stem without an -a ending (i.e. for the bigrade verbs, whose stems end in either -e or -i). This raises the assumption that this -a ending appears to be part of the auxiliary verb, but not part of the verb conjugation stem. (The causative auxiliary verbs 「す」 and 「さす」have same distribution and vowel arrangement.) According to this assumption, some scholars like Nicolas Tranter argue that the irrealis does not exist, per se, interpreting this instead as a more primitive "stem" plus an -a element that is the start of a following word. However, this rejection of the irrealis cannot explain the attested forms seen where the irrealis stem ending in -a is followed by the conditional particle 「ば」("if"), expressing an unreal condition (i.e. subjunctive mood) in classical Japanese.[17] In actuality, the Japanese term 「未然形」 (mizenkei), while often translated as "irrealis", literally means "imperfect form", and it is named after this kind of usage. Additionally, the rejection cannot explain the modal auxiliary verb 「む」("seems as if, looks like, as though it should/could..."), which also attaches to the irrealis.[18] Various examples:
Note that auxiliary verbs have their own inflections. For example, 「るる」 is the attributive of passive / spontaneous / potential auxiliary 「る」, while「らるる」 is the attributive of synonymous 「らる」 (the form attaching to bigrade verbs, whose stems end in vowels -e or -i). Additionally, both of these auxiliaries inflect according to the lower bigrade conjugation paradigm.
The infinitive had two functions: a linking function with another yougen or auxiliary verb, and a nominal function as a deverbal noun, but these two functions have different pitch patterns.
Generally, The yougen or auxiliary verb occurred before conjunction particle 「とも」 ("even if") in the conclusive form, but in some instances in Old Japanese poetry, the upper monograde verb 「見る」 appears in the infinitive form instead before「とも」:[19]
It is possible that the monograde verb infinitive form mi above that was used before 「とも」 was the earlier true conclusive form. Alternatively, the form above may have been an instance of poetic contraction to limit the number of morae on the line to the expected seven.
Additionally, before auxiliary verb 「べし」(beshi, "should/could"), any yougen should generally use the conclusive, while R-irregular verbs use the attributive instead (「あり」 ari, 'be' at the end of a sentence but 「あるべし」 aru beshi, 'should be').[20] With endings such as 「べし」 (beshi), there is strong evidence that this word was originally the adverb 「宜し」 (ubeshi, "certainly"),[21] and thus the observed combination of aru beshi is probably a fusion of the root ar- of the verb with the initial u sound of the auxiliary — suggesting that, in 「あるべし」 (aru beshi), when we would expect ari beshi, the apparently anomalous u was actually part of the following word, and not part of the verb form.
Auxiliary verbs
Auxiliary verbs are attached to the various forms of yougen, and a yougen could be followed by several such endings in a string. Auxiliary verbs are classified into many inflectional class like verbs.
Generally, To learn how to use a Auxiliary verb, we need to know (1)its inflection, (2)required forms of its preceding word, and (3) various function. The following is a detail example about 「る」and 「らる」.
「る」 requires to be preceded by irrealiswith-a ending (i.e. quadrigrade, N-irregular and R-irregular), while 「らる」requires irrealiswithout-a ending(i.e. other classes).
They have 4 different functions.
Representing passive mood: 人にあなづらるるもの (The Pillow Book) translation: thing that isdespisedby people
Representing slight respect to someone (by means of passive mood): 母の悲しがらるること (Tosa Nikki) translation: the thing that make the mother (author's wife) sad (i.e. representing slight respect to his own wife)
Expressing possibility or potential. 弓矢して射られじ (The Tale of the Bamboo Cutter) translation: It doesn't seem bow and arrow canshoot (it down). (Noted that 「じ」is a modal auxiliary verb that requires to be preceded by irrealis)
Representing a spontaneous voice(i.e. without volitional control). 風の音にぞ驚かれぬる (Kokin Wakashū, 169th) translation: the sound of wind (exactly) hasmade me startled. (Noted that「ぬる」is attributive of perfect auxiliary verb「ぬ」. Since it's "bound" by binding particle「ぞ」, it has to occur as attributive.)
Since the axiliary verb of pass tentative mood「けむ」needs to be preceded by infinitive, 「あり」is in infinitive form. And then naturally, the adjective 「悲し」links to 「あり」 by infinitive (連用形). In Man'yōshū there's also example of 「-かり」.
Since the auxiliary verb of unwitnessed past「けり」needs to be preceded by infinitive, 「悲し」is in infinitive form.
So it's reasonable to assume that the infinitive suffix「-かり」is derived from 「-くあり」that had lost its initial u-sound(i.e. sound change of infinitive suffix + 「あり」). There's also similar example about other forms in Man'yōshū.[26]
From above paragraph, we can realize that kari inflection is generally used to link to a auxiliary verbs(so it's also called 「補助活用」, "complement and auxiliary inflection"), but there's an example to show that the imperative form of kari inflection is an exception of this rule:
That is, the imperative form of kari inflection is independently used without linking to any auxiliary verb.(However, it actually expresses a wish but not a order.)
*The Japanese term 悄然 (seuzen, modern shōzen) is a borrowing from Middle Chinese word 悄然 with reconstructed pronunciation /tsʰjɑunʑǐɛn/,[27] meaning ‘quietly, softly’. Like 悄然 (seuzen), most tari adjectives are derived from Chinese borrowings.
The nari and tari inflections shared a similar etymology. The nari form was a contraction of the adverbial particle「に」and the -r irregular verb「有り」"be, exist": に + あり → なり, while the tari inflection was a contraction of the adverbial particle と and 有り: と + あり → たり.
^Labrune 2012, p. 89: "Consonantal palatalization is not original in Japanese. It is generally considered to have appeared in the language under the influence of Chinese loans. Indeed, palatalizations are particularly frequent in Sino-Japanese morphemes. They occasionally occur in Yamato words like kyou ‘today’, but this is always the result of a secondary development".
^Labrune 2012, p. 91: "Moras of the CwV shape (called gôyôon 合拗音 in the traditional terminology) existed up until recently in certain Sino-Japanese words, for example okwashi お菓子 ‘cake’, gwaikoku 外国 ‘foreign country’. They reflect the presence of a labial glide in the Chinese original forms. Old Chinese accepted /w/ after a large variety of consonants, but, apart from a small number of exceptions attested in documents of the Heian period, it is only after the velar consonants /k/ and /g/ that /w/ could be found in Japanese. Although the combinations /kwa/, /gwa/, /kwe/, /gwe/, /kwi/, and /gwi/ all existed, only /kwa/ and /gwa/ have been maintained until the middle or end of the nineteenth century, and still exist nowadays in certain dialects, mainly in the Tôhoku or Kyûshû areas."
