This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.Find sources: "Elastic collision" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (September 2020) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

In physics, an **elastic collision** is an encounter (collision) between two bodies in which the total kinetic energy of the two bodies remains the same. In an ideal, perfectly elastic collision, there is no net conversion of kinetic energy into other forms such as heat, noise, or potential energy.

During the collision of small objects, kinetic energy is first converted to potential energy associated with a repulsive or attractive force between the particles (when the particles move against this force, i.e. the angle between the force and the relative velocity is obtuse), then this potential energy is converted back to kinetic energy (when the particles move with this force, i.e. the angle between the force and the relative velocity is acute).

Collisions of atoms are elastic, for example Rutherford backscattering.

A useful special case of elastic collision is when the two bodies have equal mass, in which case they will simply exchange their momenta.

The *molecules*—as distinct from atoms—of a gas or liquid rarely experience perfectly elastic collisions because kinetic energy is exchanged between the molecules’ translational motion and their internal degrees of freedom with each collision. At any instant, half the collisions are, to a varying extent, *inelastic collisions* (the pair possesses less kinetic energy in their translational motions after the collision than before), and half could be described as “super-elastic” (possessing *more* kinetic energy after the collision than before). Averaged across the entire sample, molecular collisions can be regarded as essentially elastic as long as Planck's law forbids energy from being carried away by black-body photons.

In the case of macroscopic bodies, perfectly elastic collisions are an ideal never fully realized, but approximated by the interactions of objects such as billiard balls.

When considering energies, possible rotational energy before and/or after a collision may also play a role.

In any collision, momentum is conserved; but in an elastic collision, kinetic energy is also conserved.^{[1]} Consider particles A and B with masses *m*_{A}, *m*_{B}, and velocities *v*_{A1}, *v*_{B1} before collision, *v*_{A2}, *v*_{B2} after collision. The conservation of momentum before and after the collision is expressed by:^{[1]}

Likewise, the conservation of the total kinetic energy is expressed by:^{[1]}

These equations may be solved directly to find when are known:^{[2]}

Alternatively the final velocity of a particle, v_{2} (v_{A2} or v_{B2}) is expressed by:

Where:

- e is the coefficient of restitution.
- v
_{CoM}is the velocity of the center of mass of the system of two particles. - v
_{1}(v_{A1}or v_{B1}) is the initial velocity of the particle.

If both masses are the same, we have a trivial solution:
This simply corresponds to the bodies exchanging their initial velocities with each other.^{[2]}

As can be expected, the solution is invariant under adding a constant to all velocities (Galilean relativity), which is like using a frame of reference with constant translational velocity. Indeed, to derive the equations, one may first change the frame of reference so that one of the known velocities is zero, determine the unknown velocities in the new frame of reference, and convert back to the original frame of reference.

- Before collision
- Ball A: mass = 3 kg, velocity = 4 m/s
- Ball B: mass = 5 kg, velocity = 0 m/s
- After collision
- Ball A: velocity = −1 m/s
- Ball B: velocity = 3 m/s

Another situation:

The following illustrate the case of equal mass, .

In the limiting case where is much larger than , such as a ping-pong paddle hitting a ping-pong ball or an SUV hitting a trash can, the heavier mass hardly changes velocity, while the lighter mass bounces off, reversing its velocity plus approximately twice that of the heavy one.^{[3]}

In the case of a large , the value of is small if the masses are approximately the same: hitting a much lighter particle does not change the velocity much, hitting a much heavier particle causes the fast particle to bounce back with high speed. This is why a neutron moderator (a medium which slows down fast neutrons, thereby turning them into thermal neutrons capable of sustaining a chain reaction) is a material full of atoms with light nuclei which do not easily absorb neutrons: the lightest nuclei have about the same mass as a neutron.

To derive the above equations for rearrange the kinetic energy and momentum equations:

Dividing each side of the top equation by each side of the bottom equation, and using gives:

That is, the relative velocity of one particle with respect to the other is reversed by the collision.

Now the above formulas follow from solving a system of linear equations for regarding as constants: Once is determined, can be found by symmetry.

With respect to the center of mass, both velocities are reversed by the collision: a heavy particle moves slowly toward the center of mass, and bounces back with the same low speed, and a light particle moves fast toward the center of mass, and bounces back with the same high speed.

The velocity of the center of mass does not change by the collision. To see this, consider the center of mass at time before collision and time after collision:

Hence, the velocities of the center of mass before and after collision are:

The numerators of and are the total momenta before and after collision. Since momentum is conserved, we have

According to special relativity,
where *p* denotes momentum of any particle with mass, *v* denotes velocity, and *c* is the speed of light.

In the center of momentum frame where the total momentum equals zero,

Here represent the rest masses of the two colliding bodies, represent their velocities before collision, their velocities after collision, their momenta, is the speed of light in vacuum, and denotes the total energy, the sum of rest masses and kinetic energies of the two bodies.

Since the total energy and momentum of the system are conserved and their rest masses do not change, it is shown that the momentum of the colliding body is decided by the rest masses of the colliding bodies, total energy and the total momentum. Relative to the center of momentum frame, the momentum of each colliding body does not change magnitude after collision, but reverses its direction of movement.

Comparing with classical mechanics, which gives accurate results dealing with macroscopic objects moving much slower than the speed of light, total momentum of the two colliding bodies is frame-dependent. In the center of momentum frame, according to classical mechanics,

This agrees with the relativistic calculation despite other differences.

One of the postulates in Special Relativity states that the laws of physics, such as conservation of momentum, should be invariant in all inertial frames of reference. In a general inertial frame where the total momentum could be arbitrary,

We can look at the two moving bodies as one system of which the total momentum is the total energy is and its velocity is the velocity of its center of mass. Relative to the center of momentum frame the total momentum equals zero. It can be shown that is given by: Now the velocities before the collision in the center of momentum frame and are:

When and

Therefore, the classical calculation holds true when the speed of both colliding bodies is much lower than the speed of light (~300,000 kilometres per second).

Using the so-called *parameter of velocity* (usually called the rapidity),

we get

Relativistic energy and momentum are expressed as follows:

Equations sum of energy and momentum colliding masses and (velocities correspond to the velocity parameters ), after dividing by adequate power are as follows:

and dependent equation, the sum of above equations:

subtract squares both sides equations "momentum" from "energy" and use the identity after simplifying we get:

for non-zero mass, using the hyperbolic trigonometric identity we get:

as functions is even we get two solutions: from the last equation, leading to a non-trivial solution, we solve and substitute into the dependent equation, we obtain and then we have:

It is a solution to the problem, but expressed by the parameters of velocity. Return substitution to get the solution for velocities is:

Substitute the previous solutions and replace: and after long transformation, with substituting: we get:

For the case of two non-spinning colliding bodies in two dimensions, the motion of the bodies is determined by the three conservation laws of momentum, kinetic energy and angular momentum. The overall velocity of each body must be split into two perpendicular velocities: one tangent to the common normal surfaces of the colliding bodies at the point of contact, the other along the line of collision. Since the collision only imparts force along the line of collision, the velocities that are tangent to the point of collision do not change. The velocities along the line of collision can then be used in the same equations as a one-dimensional collision. The final velocities can then be calculated from the two new component velocities and will depend on the point of collision. Studies of two-dimensional collisions are conducted for many bodies in the framework of a two-dimensional gas.

In a center of momentum frame at any time the velocities of the two bodies are in opposite directions, with magnitudes inversely proportional to the masses. In an elastic collision these magnitudes do not change. The directions may change depending on the shapes of the bodies and the point of impact. For example, in the case of spheres the angle depends on the distance between the (parallel) paths of the centers of the two bodies. Any non-zero change of direction is possible: if this distance is zero the velocities are reversed in the collision; if it is close to the sum of the radii of the spheres the two bodies are only slightly deflected.

Assuming that the second particle is at rest before the collision, the angles of deflection of the two particles, and , are related to the angle of deflection in the system of the center of mass by^{[4]}
The magnitudes of the velocities of the particles after the collision are:

The final x and y velocities components of the first ball can be calculated as:^{[5]}
where *v*_{1} and *v*_{2} are the scalar sizes of the two original speeds of the objects, *m*_{1} and *m*_{2} are their masses, *θ*_{1} and *θ*_{2} are their movement angles, that is, (meaning moving directly down to the right is either a −45° angle, or a 315° angle), and lowercase phi (φ) is the contact angle. (To get the x and y velocities of the second ball, one needs to swap all the '1' subscripts with '2' subscripts.)

This equation is derived from the fact that the interaction between the two bodies is easily calculated along the contact angle, meaning the velocities of the objects can be calculated in one dimension by rotating the x and y axis to be parallel with the contact angle of the objects, and then rotated back to the original orientation to get the true x and y components of the velocities.^{[6]}^{[7]}^{[8]}^{[9]}^{[10]}^{[11]}

In an angle-free representation, the changed velocities are computed using the centers **x**_{1} and **x**_{2} at the time of contact as
where the angle brackets indicate the inner product (or dot product) of two vectors.

In the particular case of particles having equal masses, it can be verified by direct computation from the result above that the scalar product of the velocities before and after the collision are the same, that is Although this product is not an additive invariant in the same way that momentum and kinetic energy are for elastic collisions, it seems that preservation of this quantity can nonetheless be used to derive higher-order conservation laws.^{[12]}

- ^
^{a}^{b}^{c}Serway & Jewett 2014, p. 257 - ^
^{a}^{b}Serway & Jewett 2014, p. 258 **^**Serway & Jewett 2014, pp. 258–259**^**Landau & Lifshitz 1976, p. 46**^**Craver, William E. (13 August 2013). "Elastic Collisions". Retrieved 4 March 2023.^{[self-published source]}**^**Parkinson, Stephen (1869) "An Elementary Treatise on Mechanics" (4th ed.) p. 197. London. MacMillan**^**Love, A. E. H. (1897) "Principles of Dynamics" p. 262. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press**^**Routh, Edward J. (1898) "A Treatise on Dynamics of a Particle" p. 39. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press**^**Glazebrook, Richard T. (1911) "Dynamics" (2nd ed.) p. 217. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press**^**Osgood, William F. (1949) "Mechanics" p. 272. London. MacMillan**^**Stephenson, Reginald J. (1952) "Mechanics and Properties of Matter" p. 40. New York. Wiley**^**Chliamovitch, G.; Malaspinas, O.; Chopard, B. (2017). "Kinetic theory beyond the Stosszahlansatz".*Entropy*.**19**(8): 381. Bibcode:2017Entrp..19..381C. doi:10.3390/e19080381.

- Landau, L. D.; Lifshitz, E. M. (1976).
*Mechanics*(3rd ed.). Pergamon Press. ISBN 0-08-021022-8. - Raymond, David J. "10.4.1 Elastic collisions".
*A Radically Modern Approach to Introductory Physics*. Vol. 1: Fundamental Principles. Socorro, New Mexico: New Mexico Tech Press. ISBN 978-0-9830394-5-7. - Serway, Raymond A.; Jewett, John W. (2014). "9: Linear Momentum and Collisions".
*Physics for scientists and engineers with modern physics*(9th ed.). Boston. ISBN 978-1-133-95405-7.`((cite book))`

: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)

- Rigid Body Collision Resolution in three dimensions including a derivation using the conservation laws