.mw-parser-output .hidden-begin{box-sizing:border-box;width:100%;padding:5px;border:none;font-size:95%}.mw-parser-output .hidden-title{font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;text-align:left}.mw-parser-output .hidden-content{text-align:left}You can help expand this article with text translated from
the corresponding article in Russian. (November 2015) Click [show] for important translation instructions.
View a machine-translated version of the Russian article.
Machine translation, like
DeepL or
Google Translate, is a useful starting point for translations, but translators must revise errors as necessary and confirm that the translation is accurate, rather than simply copy-pasting machine-translated text into the English Wikipedia.
Do not translate text that appears unreliable or low-quality. If possible, verify the text with references provided in the foreign-language article.
You must provide
copyright attribution in the
edit summary accompanying your translation by providing an
interlanguage link to the source of your translation. A model attribution edit summary is Content in this edit is translated from the existing Russian Wikipedia article at [[:ru:Эннекен, Эмиль]]; see its history for attribution.
You should also add the template ((Translated|ru|Эннекен, Эмиль)) to the
talk page.
For more guidance, see
Wikipedia:Translation.
Emile Hennequin (born Palermo, Kingdom of the Two Sicilies; 1859 – 14 July 1888)[1] was a French author, publisher, writer, and philosopher[2][1] who wrote theoretical and critical pieces.[3][4] His work "exemplified the tension between the positivist drive to systematize literary criticism and the unfettered imagination inherent in literature." He was one of the few positivist thinkers who disagreed with the notion that subjectivity invalidates observation, judgment and prediction, and argued that subjectivity does play a role in science and society. His contribution to positivism pertains not to science and its objectivity, but rather to the subjectivity of art and the way artists, their work, and audiences interrelate. Hennequin tried to analyze positivism strictly on the predictions, and the mechanical processes, but was perplexed due to the contradictions of the reactions of patrons to artwork that showed no scientific inclinations.
