You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:

This IP address has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.
This does not affect your ability to read Wikipedia pages.
Most people who see this message have done nothing wrong. Some kinds of blocks restrict editing from specific service providers or telecom companies in response to recent abuse or vandalism, and can sometimes affect other users who are unrelated to that abuse. Review the information below for assistance if you do not believe that you have done anything wrong.

The IP address or range 3.95.0.0/16 has been blocked (disabled) by ‪Blablubbs‬ for the following reason(s):

The IP address that you are currently using has been blocked because it is believed to be a web host provider or colocation provider. To prevent abuse, web hosts and colocation providers may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
You will not be able to edit Wikipedia using a web host or colocation provider because it hides your IP address, much like a proxy or VPN.
We recommend that you attempt to use another connection to edit. For example, if you use a proxy or VPN to connect to the internet, turn it off when editing Wikipedia. If you edit using a mobile connection, try using a Wi-Fi connection, and vice versa. If you are using a corporate internet connection, switch to a different Wi-Fi network. If you have a Wikipedia account, please log in.
If you do not have any other way to edit Wikipedia, you will need to request an IP block exemption.

How to appeal if you are confident that your connection does not use a colocation provider's IP address:
If you are confident that you are not using a web host, you may appeal this block by adding the following text on your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Caught by a colocation web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is _______. Place any further information here. ~~~~)). You must fill in the blank with your IP address for this block to be investigated. Your IP address can be determined here. Alternatively, if you wish to keep your IP address private you can use the unblock ticket request system. There are several reasons you might be editing using the IP address of a web host or colocation provider (such as if you are using VPN software or a business network); please use this method of appeal only if you think your IP address is in fact not a web host or colocation provider.

Administrators: The IP block exemption user right should only be applied to allow users to edit using web host in exceptional circumstances, and requests should usually be directed to the functionaries team via email. If you intend to give the IPBE user right, a CheckUser needs to take a look at the account. This can be requested most easily at SPI Quick Checkuser Requests. Unblocking an IP or IP range with this template is highly discouraged without at least contacting the blocking administrator.

This block will expire on 08:49, 2 November 2024.

Even when blocked, you will usually still be able to edit your user talk page, as well as email administrators and other editors.

For information on how to proceed, please read the FAQ for blocked users and the guideline on block appeals. The guide to appealing blocks may also be helpful.

Other useful links: Blocking policy · Help:I have been blocked
Your IP address is in a range that has been blocked on all Wikimedia Foundation wikis. The block was made by ‪Jon Kolbert‬. The reason given is Open proxy/Webhost: See the help page if you are affected .
- Start of block: 05:35, 21 February 2024
- Expiry of block: 05:35, 21 February 2029
Your current IP address is 3.95.152.51. The blocked range is 3.95.0.0/16. Please include all above details in any queries you make. If you believe you were blocked by mistake, you can find additional information and instructions in the No open proxies global policy. Otherwise, to discuss the block please post a request for review on Meta-Wiki. You could also send an email to the stewards VRT queue at stewards@wikimedia.org including all above details.

You can view and copy the source of this page:

((Infobox beverage
|name=Enviga
|image=
|type=Canned sparkling green tea
|manufacturer= Beverage Partners Worldwide (North America)
|origin= United States
|introduced=2006
))

'''Enviga''' is a [[Nestea]] carbonated [[canned tea|canned]] [[green-tea]] drink. Enviga is a trademark of [[Nestlé]] licensed to [[Beverage Partners Worldwide]], a joint venture between [[The Coca-Cola Company]] and [[Nestlé]]. It is available in three flavors: Green Tea, Tropical Pomegranate, and Mixed Berry.<ref>Coca Cola Company Press Release: http://www2.coca-cola.com/presscenter/pdfs/enviga.pdf</ref> According to Coca-Cola, Enviga burns 60 to 100 calories per three 12-oz.(330 ml) cans due to its high [[Epigallocatechin gallate|EGCG]] and [[caffeine]] content. The makers of the drink were sued for making fraudulent health claims about weight loss, and agreed to settle and cease repeating them.<ref name=magic/>

==Nutritional facts==
A can of Enviga has 5 calories, 100&nbsp;mg of [[caffeine]], 35&nbsp;mg of sodium, and 20% of the daily recommended calcium based on a 2,000 calorie diet. It is sweetened with [[aspartame]] and has no carbohydrates, fat, or protein.<ref>BBC News audio interview: http://news.bbc.co.uk/nolavconsole/ukfs_news/hi/newsid_6040000/newsid_6043700/bb_rm_6043792.stm</ref>

== Lawsuits over health claims ==
In February 2007, the watchdog group [[Center for Science in the Public Interest]] (CSPI) filed a lawsuit over company claims that Enviga acts as a calorie-burning and weight-loss product, as a "[[negative calorie]]" drink.  The group claims that if Coca-Cola and Nestlé stop marketing the product as a calorie-burner, they would drop possible litigation.  The beverage makers responded that they have deliberately avoided claims that Enviga is a weight-loss product, and that there exists independent research to substantiate the effects of the product. The watchdog group alleged that it was only a three-day study, and that it was only presented in a conference by the [[Obesity Society]], the editors of journal ''[[Obesity (journal)|Obesity]]'', where their conclusions were rejected.<ref name="bw">((citation |title= Coke and Nestle Hit with a Lawsuit for 'Negative Calories' |author= Burt Helm |date= January 31, 2007 |url= http://www.businessweek.com/stories/2007-01-31/coke-and-nestle-hit-with-a-lawsuit-for-negative-calories |archive-url= https://archive.today/20130407214838/http://www.businessweek.com/stories/2007-01-31/coke-and-nestle-hit-with-a-lawsuit-for-negative-calories |url-status= dead |archive-date= April 7, 2013 ))</ref><ref name="cspi1">((citation |title= 'Calorie Burning' Enviga Tea Drink a Fraud, Group Says. CSPI to Sue Coke, Nestlé if Weight Loss Claims Persist |work= CSPI |date= December 4, 2006 |url= http://www.cspinet.org/new/200612041.html ))</ref><ref name="cspi2">((citation |title= Watchdog Group Sues Coke, Nestlé For Bogus "Enviga" Claims. Green Tea-Flavored Diet Soda Won't Help You Lose Weight, Despite Claims of "Negative Calories" |work= CSPI |date= February 1, 2007 |url= http://www.cspinet.org/new/200702011.html |access-date= February 8, 2013 |archive-date= February 17, 2013 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20130217070746/http://www.cspinet.org/new/200702011.html |url-status= dead ))</ref> The lack of validity of the study was later referred to by the Attorney General in the settlement.<ref name="settlement"/> Studies on the combination of caffeine and green tea anti-oxidant have given mixed results, and the results are not conclusive.<ref>((citation |title= Does new Enviga tea drink really deliver "negative calories in a can"?(Product Watch) |date= March 1, 2007 |work= Environmental Nutrition newsletter |url= http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-160229838.html |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20130515090156/http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-160229838.html |url-status=dead |archive-date= May 15, 2013 ))</ref>

The [[State of Connecticut]] also investigated the calorie-burning qualities of the drink.  The [[State Attorney General]], [[Richard Blumenthal]], demanded <ref>((Cite web|url=http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,250364,00.html|title=FOXNews.com - Coca-Cola Energy Drink Investigated by Connecticut AG - Health News &#124; Current Health News &#124; Medical News<!-- Bot generated title -->|website=[[Fox News]]|date=25 March 2015 ))</ref> all scientific research associated with its calorie-burning qualities.<ref name=magic>((Cite web|url=http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/02/05/health/main2434316.shtml|title=Connecticut Probing Diet Drink Claims, Attorney General Says Enviga's Boast Must Be Supported By "Science, Not Magic" - CBS News<!-- Bot generated title -->|website=[[CBS News]]))</ref>

In February 2009 the companies made a settlement with [[Connecticut Attorney General]] [[Richard Blumenthal]], affecting several US states. They agreed to pay $650,000 to the states, remove any claims about weight loss, and add disclaimers that weight loss can only occur via diet and exercise.<ref name="settlement"/> According to the US Federal News Service, the settlement requires that "any marketing of Enviga, or a similarly formulated beverage, that uses the terms 'the calorie burner,' 'negative calories,' 'drink negative,' or makes any claims explicitly or implicitly that consumers will burn calories by drinking Enviga, there must be a clear and conspicuous disclosure that the product does not produce weight loss without diet and exercise."<ref name="settlement">((citation |title= Attorney General Announces Settlement Resolving Weight Loss, Calorie-burning Claims About Enviga |author= US Fed News Service, Including US State News |date= February 28, 2009 |url= http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P3-1653286791.html |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20130515104459/http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P3-1653286791.html |url-status=dead |archive-date= May 15, 2013 )) (requires registration)</ref>

In 2010, a [[United States courts of appeals|US court of appeals]] did not allow a woman to sue Coca-Cola for weight-loss false advertising, and CSPI reported that it would not appeal the decision.<ref name=CSPI2012/> CSPI said that the sales of Enviga had collapsed after its 2009 settlement, and that it had already met its goal of informing customers about the lack of efficacy of the beverage.<ref name=CSPI2012>((citation |title= CSPI to Drop Litigation Over Coke's Faded "Enviga". Sales Reportedly Plummeted After State Attorneys General Won Labeling Concessions |work= CSPI |date= August 17, 2010 |url= http://www.cspinet.org/new/201008171.html |access-date= December 11, 2013 |archive-date= December 11, 2013 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20131211220734/http://www.cspinet.org/new/201008171.html |url-status= dead ))</ref> CSPI announced that it was suing Coca-Cola again, but this time for its new beverage [[Vitaminwater]].<ref name=CSPI2012/>

== Sales ==
As reported in the ''Sydney Morning Herald'', flavoured bottled water, sports drinks and teas, are increasing sales with the decline in sales of sugary soft drinks – with cold tea the fastest growing non-carbonated beverage category in the [[United States|U.S.]] during the first half of 2006. Prior to launch, Coke had been trailing and losing market share<ref>((Cite web|url=https://www.smh.com.au/business/coke-serves-green-tea-to-a-world-with-calories-to-burn-20061013-gdol59.html|title=Coke serves green tea to a world with calories to burn|first=Duane Stanford in|last=Atlanta|date=October 13, 2006|website=The Sydney Morning Herald))</ref> in this sector to [[Pepsi]], [[AriZona Beverage Company|AriZona]] and [[Snapple]].

== Flavors ==
Discontinued:

*Berry
*Pomegranate
*Peach

Since the brand's inception, and the launch of the three original flavors, peach was the first to be dropped in favor of pomegranate as the third flavor.

== See also ==
* [[List of energy drinks]]

== References==
((reflist|2))

== External links ==
* [http://www.ausu.org/voicemagazine/articles/featuredisplay.php?ART=5201 "Enviga-rate Your Weight Loss Reality" - opinion piece] ((Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070928151658/http://www.ausu.org/voicemagazine/articles/featuredisplay.php?ART=5201 |date=2007-09-28 ))

((Coca-Cola brands))
((Nestlé))

[[Category:Non-alcoholic drinks]]
[[Category:Coca-Cola brands]]
[[Category:Nestlé brands]]
[[Category:Iced tea brands]]

Pages transcluded onto the current version of this page (help):

Enviga (edit)
Template:Citation (view source) (protected)
Template:Cite web (view source) (protected)
Template:Coca-Cola brands (edit)
Template:Hlist/styles.css (view source) (protected)
Template:Icon (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Infobox (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Infobox beverage (view source) (semi-protected)
Template:Infobox drink (view source) (semi-protected)
Template:Longitem (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Main other (view source) (protected)
Template:Navbox (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Nestlé (edit)
Template:Nowrap (view source) (protected)
Template:Reflist (view source) (protected)
Template:Reflist/styles.css (view source) (protected)
Template:Small (view source) (protected)
Template:Sup (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Template other (view source) (protected)
Template:The Coca-Cola Company (edit)
Template:User other (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Webarchive (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Wikidata (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Arguments (view source) (protected)
Module:Check for unknown parameters (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1 (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1/COinS (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1/Date validation (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1/Utilities (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1/Whitelist (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css (view source) (protected)
Module:Icon (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Icon/data (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Infobox (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Infobox/styles.css (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:InfoboxImage (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Navbar (view source) (protected)
Module:Navbar/configuration (view source) (protected)
Module:Navbar/styles.css (view source) (protected)
Module:Navbox (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Navbox/configuration (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Navbox/styles.css (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Wd (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Wd/i18n (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Webarchive (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Webarchive/data (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Yesno (view source) (protected)

Return to Enviga.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enviga"