This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.Find sources: "Explicitly parallel instruction computing" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (October 2010) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)

Explicitly parallel instruction computing (EPIC) is a term coined in 1997 by the HP–Intel alliance[1] to describe a computing paradigm that researchers had been investigating since the early 1980s.[2] This paradigm is also called Independence architectures. It was the basis for Intel and HP development of the Intel Itanium architecture,[3] and HP later asserted that "EPIC" was merely an old term for the Itanium architecture.[4] EPIC permits microprocessors to execute software instructions in parallel by using the compiler, rather than complex on-die circuitry, to control parallel instruction execution. This was intended to allow simple performance scaling without resorting to higher clock frequencies.

Roots in VLIW

By 1989, researchers at HP recognized that reduced instruction set computer (RISC) architectures were reaching a limit at one instruction per cycle.[clarification needed] They began an investigation into a new architecture, later named EPIC.[3] The basis for the research was VLIW, in which multiple operations are encoded in every instruction, and then processed by multiple execution units.

One goal of EPIC was to move the complexity of instruction scheduling from the CPU hardware to the software compiler, which can do the instruction scheduling statically (with help of trace feedback information). This eliminates the need for complex scheduling circuitry in the CPU, which frees up space and power for other functions, including additional execution resources. An equally important goal was to further exploit instruction level parallelism (ILP) by using the compiler to find and exploit additional opportunities for parallel execution.

VLIW (at least the original forms) has several short-comings that precluded it from becoming mainstream:

EPIC architecture evolved from VLIW architecture, but retained many concepts of the superscalar architecture.

Moving beyond VLIW

EPIC architectures add several features to get around the deficiencies of VLIW:

The EPIC architecture also includes a grab-bag of architectural concepts to increase ILP:

The Itanium architecture also added rotating register files, a tool useful for software pipelining since it avoids having to manually unroll and rename registers.

Other research and development

There have been other investigations into EPIC architectures that are not directly tied to the development of the Itanium architecture:

See also

References

  1. ^ Schlansker and Rau (February 2000). "EPIC: An Architecture for Instruction-Level Parallel Processors" (PDF). HP Laboratories Palo Alto, HPL-1999-111. Retrieved 2008-05-08.
  2. ^ US 4847755, Morrison, Gordon E.; Brooks, Christopher B. & Gluck, Frederick G., "Parallel processing method and apparatus for increasing processing throughout by parallel processing low level instructions having natural concurrencies", published 1989-07-11, assigned to MCC Development Ltd. 
  3. ^ a b "Inventing Itanium: How HP Labs Helped Create the Next-Generation Chip Architecture". HP Labs. June 2001. Retrieved 2007-12-14.
  4. ^ De Gelas, Johan (November 9, 2005). "Itanium–Is there light at the end of the tunnel?". AnandTech. Retrieved 2008-05-08.