You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:

This IP address has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.
This does not affect your ability to read Wikipedia pages.
Most people who see this message have done nothing wrong. Some kinds of blocks restrict editing from specific service providers or telecom companies in response to recent abuse or vandalism, and can sometimes affect other users who are unrelated to that abuse. Review the information below for assistance if you do not believe that you have done anything wrong.

The IP address or range 54.163.0.0/16 has been blocked (disabled) by ‪Blablubbs‬ for the following reason(s):

The IP address that you are currently using has been blocked because it is believed to be a web host provider or colocation provider. To prevent abuse, web hosts and colocation providers may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
You will not be able to edit Wikipedia using a web host or colocation provider because it hides your IP address, much like a proxy or VPN.
We recommend that you attempt to use another connection to edit. For example, if you use a proxy or VPN to connect to the internet, turn it off when editing Wikipedia. If you edit using a mobile connection, try using a Wi-Fi connection, and vice versa. If you are using a corporate internet connection, switch to a different Wi-Fi network. If you have a Wikipedia account, please log in.
If you do not have any other way to edit Wikipedia, you will need to request an IP block exemption.

How to appeal if you are confident that your connection does not use a colocation provider's IP address:
If you are confident that you are not using a web host, you may appeal this block by adding the following text on your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Caught by a colocation web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is _______. Place any further information here. ~~~~)). You must fill in the blank with your IP address for this block to be investigated. Your IP address can be determined here. Alternatively, if you wish to keep your IP address private you can use the unblock ticket request system. There are several reasons you might be editing using the IP address of a web host or colocation provider (such as if you are using VPN software or a business network); please use this method of appeal only if you think your IP address is in fact not a web host or colocation provider.

Administrators: The IP block exemption user right should only be applied to allow users to edit using web host in exceptional circumstances, and requests should usually be directed to the functionaries team via email. If you intend to give the IPBE user right, a CheckUser needs to take a look at the account. This can be requested most easily at SPI Quick Checkuser Requests. Unblocking an IP or IP range with this template is highly discouraged without at least contacting the blocking administrator.

This block will expire on 17:28, 10 March 2024.

Even when blocked, you will usually still be able to edit your user talk page, as well as email administrators and other editors.

For information on how to proceed, please read the FAQ for blocked users and the guideline on block appeals. The guide to appealing blocks may also be helpful.

Other useful links: Blocking policy · Help:I have been blocked
Your IP address is in a range that has been blocked on all Wikimedia Foundation wikis. The block was made by ‪Jon Kolbert‬. The reason given is Open proxy/Webhost: See the help page if you are affected .
- Start of block: 18:27, 12 November 2023
- Expiry of block: 18:27, 12 November 2028
Your current IP address is 54.163.179.242. The blocked range is 54.163.0.0/16. Please include all above details in any queries you make. If you believe you were blocked by mistake, you can find additional information and instructions in the No open proxies global policy. Otherwise, to discuss the block please post a request for review on Meta-Wiki. You could also send an email to the stewards VRT queue at stewards@wikimedia.org including all above details.

You can view and copy the source of this page:

((Use American English|date = March 2019))
((Short description|Federalist Paper by Alexander Hamilton "Concerning the Militia"))
((Use mdy dates|date = March 2019))
((Infobox book
| italic title      = no
| name              = Federalist No. 29
| image             = Alexander Hamilton A17950.jpg
| image_size        = 200px
| border            = yes
| caption           = Alexander Hamilton, author of Federalist No. 29
| author            = [[Alexander Hamilton]]
| language          = English
| series            = ''[[The Federalist Papers|The Federalist]]''
| publisher         = ''[[The Independent Journal]]''
| pub_date          = January 9, 1788
| media_type        = Newspaper
| preceded_by       = [[Federalist No. 28]]
| followed_by       = [[Federalist No. 30]]
| country           = United States
| title_orig        = Concerning the Militia
))
'''Federalist Paper No. 29''' is an essay by [[Alexander Hamilton]], the twenty-ninth of ''[[The Federalist Papers]]''. It was first published in ''[[The Independent Journal]]'' on January 9, 1788 under the [[pseudonym]] Publius,<ref>((cite web|url=https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Hamilton/01-04-02-0186|title=The Federalist No. 29 (9 January 1788)| publisher=[[archives.gov]] |access-date=July 6, 2020))</ref> the name under which all ''The Federalist'' papers were published. It is titled "'''Concerning the Militia'''". Unlike the rest of the ''Federalist Papers'', which were published more or less in order, No. 29 did not appear until after [[Federalist No. 36]].

Hamilton states that a well-regulated militia composed of the people will be more uniform and beneficial to the "public defense" of Americans. He argues that an excessively large militia can harm a nation's work force, as not everyone can leave their profession to go through military exercises. Thus, a smaller, but still well-regulated militia, is the answer.  In the end, Hamilton concludes that the militia, as it is constituted directly of the people and managed by the states, is not a danger to liberty when called into use by other states to do things such as quell insurrections.

== Background ==
The [[Articles of Confederation]] were ratified on March 1, 1781 to be the first constitution of the United States. Its formation came from the urgent need to stabilize the new states recently liberated from British administration. It became evident that future prosperity relied on a new structure that gave power back to the general government. At first, people were unsure if this reform would be either beneficial or detrimental to future society. The uncertainty in public opinion had to be answered in order to put the people's trust in the new constitution. Alexander Hamilton, [[James Madison]], and [[John Jay]] collectively wrote eighty five essays, known as the Federalist Papers, to persuade people, from those in politics to the average citizen, that the new constitution will be aid in the growth of the young nation. Alexander Hamilton's Federalist 29: "Concerning the Militia", describes what he implies would become of the militia. Historically, militias have been an intricate part in the lives of the people before and after the Revolution. Alone, separate militias would have been vastly insufficient in terms of comparability to fighting an army such as the British. However, these battalions do reserve a role in the new nation.

== Hamilton Argument ==

The militia's main responsibility would be to protect the nation from phenomena that can or will endanger national security. First, in "The Federalist 29", Hamilton writes that, "It requires no skill in the science of war to discern that uniformity in the organization and discipline in the militia would be attended with the most beneficial effects'".<ref name=":0">((Cite book|title=The Federalist|last=Madison|first=James|display-authors=etal|publisher=GP Putnam's sons|year=1888))</ref> 

Unlike militias of the past, Hamilton viewed new militias as a uniformed group similar to that of an organized military. "It is, therefore, with the most evident propriety, that the plan of the convention proposes to empower the Union 'to provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the militia, and for governing such part of them as may be employed in the service of the United states…" (James Madison, John Jay, The Federalist, books.google.com).<ref name=":0" /> Also, they would contain the same kind of intelligence the military would have access to. 

The essay also indicated that each state will be responsible for having their own militia. Other than the federal government having their involvement, each individual state will be held responsible for training and selecting various officers who meet the requirements given to them by Congress. Hamilton viewed that having these militias would also give power to the Union itself and avoid having civilians feel confined by the power of the federal government. Militias would also reduce the need for military camps being built, decreasing the feeling of the government's presence. The kind of involvement the federal government would have over the militias would be to call them for aid in the case that the standing military showed to be a threat to the civil liberties of the people. 

Hamilton's plan included many innovations which would accompany this new based militia to fit the standard he saw ideal. One major change would be the personnel who the militias consist of. Instead of just a disorganized group made up of random people, the militias will be composed of well trained civilians on the same level or near that of a military soldier. <blockquote>"To oblige the great body of the yeomanry, and of the other classes of the citizens, to be under arms for the purposes of going through military exercises and evolutions, as often as might be necessary to acquire the degree of perfection which would entitle them to the character of a well-regulated militia, would be a real grievance to the people, and serious public inconvenience and loss. It would form an annual deduction from the productive labor of the country… to an amount which, calculating upon the present numbers of the people, would not fall far short of the whole expense of the civil establishments of all the States. To attempt a thing which would abridge the mass of labor and industry to so considerable an extent, would be unwise, and the experiment, if made, could not succeed, because it would not long be endured. Little more can reasonably be aimed at, with respect to the people at large, than to have them properly armed and equipped; and in order to see that this be not neglected, it will be necessary to assemble them once or twice in the course of a year."<ref name="congress.gov">((Cite web|url=https://www.congress.gov/resources/display/content/The+Federalist+Papers#TheFederalistPapers-29|title = Research Guides: Federalist Papers: Primary Documents in American History: Full Text of the Federalist Papers))</ref><ref name="ReferenceA">((cite web|url=http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/fed29.asp|title=The Avalon Project : Federalist No 29|website=avalon.law.yale.edu|access-date=17 February 2018))</ref> (James Madison, John Jay, The Federalist, books.google.com).<ref name=":0" /></blockquote>

These words would have been well known to the founding fathers dating back to at least Patrick Henry's three Resolutions on March 23, 1775 at the Virginia Convention, held in the Henrico Parish Church, now called St. John's Church -- and indeed are practically a quote from Patrick Henry's 1st Resolution.<ref>((Cite web |url=http://historicstjohnschurch.org/meet-the-man |title=Meet the Man &#124; St. John's Church Foundation |access-date=February 13, 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170214101701/http://historicstjohnschurch.org/meet-the-man |archive-date=February 14, 2017 |url-status=dead ))</ref> 

Hamilton makes the point that the overall size of the militia had to be realistic. He indicated that an excessively large militia could have a negative impact on the labor economy. Therefore, he believes that it would function most appropriately if the militias would be preferably smaller and more well trained. <blockquote>"This will not only lessen the call for military establishments, but if circumstances should at any time oblige the government to form an army of any magnitude that army can never be formidable to the liberties of the people while there is a large body of citizens, little, if at all, inferior to them in discipline and the use of arms, who stand ready to defend their own rights and those of their fellow citizens. This appears to me the only substitute that can be devised for a standing army, and the best possible security against it, if it should exist".<ref name="congress.gov"/><ref name="ReferenceA"/></blockquote>

Hamilton then proceeds to attack critics of the Constitution who argued that the federal government would abuse its militia power. Likening their criticisms to "some ill written tale or romance, which instead of natural and agreeable images, exhibits to the mind nothing but frightful and distorted shapes", he argues that they are "absurdities". Taking, for example, the "exaggerated and improbable suggestions which have taken place respecting the power of calling for the services of the militia", he notes the absurdity of the idea that the federal government will be able to call people from their homes to subjugate their neighbors, or serve as debt payments to foreign powers.<ref name="avalon.law.yale.edu">((cite web|url=http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/fed29.asp|title=The Avalon Project : Federalist No 29|website=avalon.law.yale.edu|access-date=17 February 2018))</ref>

Ultimately, Hamilton argues, the militia will be used to defend a "neighboring State" from a "common enemy" or to "guard the republic against the violence of faction and sedition". By its nature, the militia will not be easy for the federal government to abuse, and will instead act as a check on tyranny.<ref name="avalon.law.yale.edu"/>

== Anti Federalist/ Opposition Argument ==
In the Anti-Federalist papers, the authors wrote about their concern about giving more power to the Federal Government. "Centinel feared not only a standing army but the abuse of local militias by the national government." (Paul Finkelman, ''Complete Anti-Federalist'', scholarship.law.cornell.edu).<ref name=":1">((Cite book|title=Complete Anti-Federalist|last=Finkelman|first=Paul|year=1984))</ref> When it came to the militias, one author writing under the pseudonym "[[Samuel Bryan|Centinel]]" felt that the militias were just another tool the general government had to use however they pleased. Other authors, such as Maryland's Luther Martin, similarly questioned federal control over the state militias. Martin feared that congressional authority over the militias meant that "the only defence and protection which the state can have for the security of their rights against arbitrary encroachments of the general government, is taken entirely out of the power of their respective States, and placed under the power of Congress." (Paul Finkelman, ''Complete Anti-Federalist'', scholarship.law.cornell.edu).<ref name=":1" /><ref>[https://books.google.com/books?id=Y2UFAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA371 The Debates in the Several State Conventions on the Adoption of the Federal Constitution, as Recommended by the General Convention at Philadelphia in 1787]</ref> Martin went on to show his concerns about the power the federal government would have by saying the states are left basically useless and could easily become "slaves" to the national government. Despite having militias in each state, the federal government still had power over the militias. Alexander Hamilton understood the opposition to the Federalist views on Militias. The extensive control by the federal government was worrisome to those who opposed this essay. "...What reason could there be to infer, that force was intended to be the sole instrument of authority, merely because there is a power to make use of it when necessary?" (James Madison, John Jay, ''The Federalist'', books.google.com).<ref name=":0" /> He mentions the possibility of forming corps with young soldiers who are willing for their country. "... The attention of the government ought particularly to be directed to the formation of a select corps of moderate extent, upon such principles as will really fit them for service in case of need" (James Madison, John Jay, ''The Federalist'', books.google.com).<ref name=":0" /> Hamilton wrote that the militia would be composed of soldiers who would not just protect and serve their country but ensure that it does not become corrupt. He also mentioned in his essay that some people see this idea as unrealistic. "There is something so far-fetched and so extravagant in the idea of danger to liberty from the militia, that one is at a loss whether to treat it with gravity or with raillery ... Where, in the name of common-sense, are our fears to end if we may not trust our sons, our brothers, our neighbors, our fellow citizens?" (James Madison, John Jay, ''The Federalist'', books.google.com).<ref name=":0" /> Hamilton argues to critics who doubt that the militia would be trusted that they forget militia is made up of the people the average citizen would know and trust.

== References ==
<references />

== Primary Sources ==

((refimprove section|date=January 2018))

* Finkelman, Paul. "Complete Anti-Federalist." (1984): 182.
* Madison, James, and John Jay. The Federalist. GP Putnam's sons, 1888.
* Duvall, Edward D. "Practical Aspects of Gun Control, Part 3." (2013).
* Neubauer, Martin. A Civil-Military Crisis? Tocqueville's Theory of Civil-Military Relations. No. NDU-NWC-99-E-34. NATIONAL WAR COLL WASHINGTON DC, 1998.
* Massaro, John. "What the Second Amendment Meant to the Founders."Soapbox Weekly, February 11 (2013).
* Potter, Michael Ross. "Governing With One Hand on the Plow Adding the Voice of Federal Farmer to the Constitutional School of American Public Administration." Administration & Society 44.7 (2012): 779-799.
* History.com Staff. "Articles of Confederation." History.com. A&E Television Networks, 2009. Web. 11 Oct. 2016.
* "Minutemen." Ushistory.org. Independence Hall Association, n.d. Web. 11 Oct. 2016.
* "National Guard." How We Began. N.p., n.d. Web. 11 Oct. 2016.
* "Militia in the Revolutionary War, Yorktown Victory Center." History Is Fun. N.p., n.d. Web. 11 Oct. 2016.

== External links ==
((wikisource|The_Federalist_Papers/No._29|Federalist No. 29))
* [https://www.congress.gov/resources/display/content/The+Federalist+Papers#TheFederalistPapers-29 Text of The Federalist No. 29]: [[congress.gov]]

((Federalist Papers))

[[Category:Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton|29]]
[[Category:1788 in American law]]
[[Category:1788 essays]]
[[Category:1788 in the United States]]

Pages transcluded onto the current version of this page (help):

Federalist No. 29 (edit)
Template:Ambox (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Both (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Cite book (view source) (protected)
Template:Cite web (view source) (protected)
Template:DMCA (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Dated maintenance category (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Dated maintenance category (articles) (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:FULLROOTPAGENAME (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Federalist Papers (edit)
Template:Hlist/styles.css (view source) (protected)
Template:Infobox (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Infobox book (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Longitem (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Main other (view source) (protected)
Template:More citations needed (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:More citations needed section (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Navbox (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Ns has subpages (view source) (protected)
Template:Pagetype (view source) (protected)
Template:Plainlist/styles.css (view source) (protected)
Template:Refimprove section (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:SDcat (view source) (protected)
Template:Short description (view source) (protected)
Template:Short description/lowercasecheck (view source) (protected)
Template:Side box (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Sister project (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Sp (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Template other (view source) (protected)
Template:Use American English (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Use mdy dates (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Wikidata image (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Wikisource (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Arguments (view source) (protected)
Module:Category handler (view source) (protected)
Module:Category handler/blacklist (view source) (protected)
Module:Category handler/config (view source) (protected)
Module:Category handler/data (view source) (protected)
Module:Category handler/shared (view source) (protected)
Module:Check for unknown parameters (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1 (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1/COinS (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1/Date validation (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1/Utilities (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1/Whitelist (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css (view source) (protected)
Module:Disambiguation/templates (view source) (protected)
Module:Infobox (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Infobox/styles.css (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:InfoboxImage (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Message box (view source) (protected)
Module:Message box/ambox.css (view source) (protected)
Module:Message box/configuration (view source) (protected)
Module:Namespace detect/config (view source) (protected)
Module:Namespace detect/data (view source) (protected)
Module:Navbar (view source) (protected)
Module:Navbar/configuration (view source) (protected)
Module:Navbar/styles.css (view source) (protected)
Module:Navbox (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Navbox/configuration (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Navbox/styles.css (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Ns has subpages (view source) (protected)
Module:Pagetype (view source) (protected)
Module:Pagetype/config (view source) (protected)
Module:Pagetype/disambiguation (view source) (protected)
Module:Pagetype/setindex (view source) (protected)
Module:Pagetype/softredirect (view source) (protected)
Module:SDcat (view source) (protected)
Module:Side box (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Side box/styles.css (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:String (view source) (protected)
Module:Unsubst (view source) (protected)
Module:Wikidata (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Wikitext Parsing (view source) (protected)
Module:Yesno (view source) (protected)

Return to Federalist No. 29.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federalist_No._29"