Like all members of the suborderAgnostida, Glyptagnostus reticulatus is completely blind and only has two thoracicsegments. The cephalon and pygidium are more or less the same size and shape (isopygous).[1] The glabella of the cephalon has two lobes. The front lobe is roughly squarish in shape, while the rear lobe is elongated and split along the middle. The cephalon has a narrow well-defined border. The pygidium has a long tapering central axis which can be divided into three lobes. The axis is connected to the rear margin by a central furrow. At both sides of the axis are a row of four or more pits. The border of the pygidium is also well-defined, widening towards the back, and with short, backward facing marginal spines.[2]
Like other members of the genus, the cephalon always exhibits a pair of kidney-shaped lumps next to the front glabellar lobe. Both the cephalon and the pygidium are highly ornamented with radiating patterns of furrows, resembling a net. The patterns are not perfectly bilaterally symmetrical and can vary between different individuals in the species. They can be distinguished from other members of the genus by irregular patterns of cross furrows that connect the radial furrows. The third pygidial axial lobe is longer than half the length of the second pygidial axial lobe.[2]
Three subspecies were previously proposed for Glyptagnostus reticulatus:[2]
Two of the subspecies, Glyptagnostus reticulatus reticulatus and Glyptagnostus reticulatus angelini, were proposed by the American paleontologistAllison R. Palmer in 1962. The third subspecies, Glyptagnostus reticulatus nodulosus was proposed by the Swedish paleontologist Anton Hilmar Westergård in 1947, but it has generally not been accepted by other authors.[2]
Slab showing infraspecific variation within Glyptagnostus reticulatus
According to Palmer, Glyptagnostus reticulatus angelini can be distinguished from the nominate subspecies Glyptagnostus reticulatus reticulatus by a third (distal) pygidial axial lobe that is less than 7/10th of the length of the second lobe. Glyptagnostus reticulatus angelini also has poorly developed longitudinal furrows outlining the pygidial axis and a variable degree of reticulation. Glyptagnostus reticulatus reticulatus, in contrast, has well-developed longitudinal furrows surrounding the pygidial axis and strongly reticulate patterns (though they are less convex).[2]
The Australian paleontologist James B. Jago, however, questioned Palmer's diagnoses in 1973, noting that the differences in the lengths of the pygidial axial lobes used by Palmer to separate the subspecies, depended on minute differences. He also noted that Palmer acknowledged a complete evolutionary gradation between the two subspecies, and thus doubted the utility of establishing formal diagnoses for both.[3] Nevertheless, Palmer's subspecies remained commonly used throughout much of the 20th century, with Glyptagnostus reticulatus reticulatus being used for strongly reticulate specimens and Glyptagnostus reticulatus angelini for those with weaker reticulation.[4]
In 2000, the Chinese paleontologist Shanchi Peng and the American paleontologist Richard A. Robison synonymized all subspecies previously described as merely morphotypes, with individuals exhibiting weaker reticulation stratigraphically younger than individuals with stronger reticulation.[4]
Taxonomy
A complete specimen of Glyptagnostus reticulatus
Glyptagnostus reticulatus was first described by the Swedish paleontologist Nils Peter Angelin in 1851 as Agnostus reticulatus.[5] It became the type species of the genusGlyptagnostus under the synonymGlyptagnostus toeruma, established by the Australian geologist Frederick William Whitehouse in 1936. Westergård recognized G. toeruma as a synonym in 1947. As such, Agnostus reticulatus is now accepted under the combination Glyptagnostus reticulatus.[2][6]
The species was also originally considered as the type species of the genus Ptychagnostus, established by the German paleontologist Otto Jaekel in his paper Über die Agnostiden (1909). But because of a printing error, Agnostus punctuosus was instead made to appear as if it was the intended type species. The mistake was discovered, but by then the usage of the genera had already stabilized. The genus Ptychagnostus was retained as if Jaekel described it with Agnostus punctuosus as the type species, while Glyptagnostus remains valid.[7]
Glyptagnostus reticulatus is classified under the genus Glyptagnostus of the family Glyptagnostidae.[8] The generic name is derived from Ancient Greek γλυπτός (glyptos, 'engraved') and άγνωστος (ágnostos, "unknown"). The specific name is derived from Latinreticulatus ('net-like').[7]
^Allison R. Palmer (1968). "Cambrian trilobites of east-central Alaska". Lower paleozoic paleontology and stratigraphy, east-central Alaska. Geological Survey Professional paper 559-B. United States Geological Survey, US Department of the Interior, United States Government Printing Office. p. B27.
.png)
.png)
.png)
