An elevated road employing reinforced concrete balanced cantilever beam supports with a single central column. The deck spine and wings are of hollow prestressed concrete design, with each span being tensioned by longitudinal tendons (four clusters, each of sixteen 29 mm (1.1 in) steel cables).[8] The flyover was designed by G. Maunsell & Partners, Consulting Engineers, led by Peter Wroth[9] and is 622 metres (2,041 ft) long.[2] When built the flyover included heating cables to "eliminate ice formation".[10] The system was initially successful,[11] though a £4800 bill for the 1962–63 winter (equivalent to £100,000 in 2021) "so shocked Hammersmith Borough Council that, as a protest, it cut off the electricity". London County Council paid the bill after this.[12]
The heating became defective at some point a "long time" before 2000.[13]
Completed in 1961, it was one of the first examples of its design. J&J Dean, a London-based civil engineering contractor, built the flyover at a cost of £1.2 million. The then Conservative Transport Minister Ernest Marples had been a Marples, Ridgway shareholder. To avoid a conflict of interest Marples undertook to sell his controlling shareholder interest in the company as soon as he became Minister of Transport in October 1959, although there was a purchaser's requirement that he buy back the shares after he ceased to hold office, at the price paid, should the purchaser so require.[14]
Much of the churchyard of St Paul's Church, the oldest parish church of Hammersmith, had to be cleared for the project, including an old wall and many grave markers.[15]
Repair work
Sign showing temporary flyover closureThe flyover after repair work was completed in 2015, with new bolts and sections of tensile cable visible on the surface of the structure
In December 2011 Transport for London (TfL) issued a statement that "damage to the ageing 1960s structure has been caused by water ingress, including salt water due to grit laid during the winter months, which has corroded and weakened the cables which help support the flyover".[1] TfL stated there was "a very remote possibility that Hammersmith Flyover [would] collapse".[16][17]
The Fulham & Hammersmith Chronicle claim that they were contacted on 14 December 2011 by a whistleblower who revealed that problems with the structure were far more severe than was being made public.[18][19] The flyover was closed to all traffic from 23 December 2011[20][21] to 12 January 2012 after structural defects were discovered.[7] From 13 January[7] to 27 May[22] the bridge was only open to a single lane of light traffic in each direction for repair work. TfL planned to strengthen six of the sixteen arches before the London 2012 Olympic Games and the remaining ten arches after the games.[23] New post-tensioned steel cables "are being installed in concrete blocks above and below the deck's central reservation".[24] The repairs are now complete and extended the life of the bridge by 15 years.[25] The cost of repairs was estimated to be around £10 million.[26]
In June 2013 it was announced further repairs were required, a project estimated to cost £60m.[27]
Transport for London announced that "The 18-month project will see the flyover strengthened, the bearings underneath the structure replaced, a new carriageway drainage system [fitted] and the entire flyover waterproofed and resurfaced."[28] The cost subsequently rose to £100 million.[29] TfL announced on 4 September 2015 that repair work to the flyover had been completed.[30]
Replacement tunnel
The construction sector has proposed that the flyover be replaced with a tunnel. A group of architects, including Assael Architecture and Simone de Gale, ran an event as part of London Festival of Architecture in 2012 to introduce the idea and gauge public interest.[31] Following a mixed but mostly positive response, the West London Link[32] was set up to explore the options in more detail. Three options were presented to the public in February 2014.[33] A template is the Alaskan Way Viaduct replacement tunnel in Seattle. The then mayor of London, Boris Johnson, added publicity to the concept.[25] In February 2015 Johnson suggested a toll charge might be needed to cover the estimated £1.5 billion cost of building the tunnel.[34]
^Basham, Rupert (2 February 2012). "Feature: The birth of the Hammersmith Flyover". Hammersmith & Fulham Chronicle. Retrieved 2 February 2012. The volume of vehicles was such an issue that during the flyover's 22-month construction period, traffic had doubled in the area, reaching a peak of 70,000 cars a day.
^ abcRawlinson, S. R. J.; Stott, P. F. (1962). "The Hammersmith Flyover (Includes Plates.)". ICE Proceedings. 23 (4): 565. doi:10.1680/iicep.1962.10813.
^Information, Reed Business (13 December 1962). "BICC (advert)". New Scientist. 16 (317): 693. ISSN0262-4079. Retrieved 13 January 2012. ((cite journal)): |first1= has generic name (help)
^"The road heating of the Hammersmith flyover has been particularly successful during this prolonged cold spell". The Surveyor and Municipal and County Engineer. 122.
^"Snow on the Roads". The Economist. Vol. 214, no. 1. p. 55. The bill, at £4800, for heating the Hammersmith flyover in the winter of 1962-63 so shocked Hammersmith Borough Council that, as a protest, it cut off the electricity. (The LCC now pays.)
A4
