Isostasy (Greek ísos "equal", stásis "standstill") or isostatic equilibrium is the state of gravitational equilibrium between Earth's crust (or lithosphere) and mantle such that the crust "floats" at an elevation that depends on its thickness and density. This concept is invoked to explain how different topographic heights can exist at Earth's surface. Although originally defined in terms of continental crust and mantle,[1] it has subsequently been interpreted in terms of lithosphere and asthenosphere, particularly with respect to oceanic island volcanoes,[2] such as the Hawaiian Islands.

Although Earth is a dynamic system that responds to loads in many different ways,[3] isostasy describes the important limiting case in which crust and mantle are in static equilibrium. Certain areas (such as the Himalayas and other convergent margins) are not in isostatic equilibrium and are not well described by isostatic models.

The general term 'isostasy' was coined in 1882 by the American geologist Clarence Dutton.[4][5][6]

History of the concept

In the 18th century, French geodesists attempted to determine the shape of the Earth (the geoid) by measuring the length of a degree of latitude at different latitudes (arc measurement). A party working in Ecuador was aware that its plumb lines, used to determine the vertical direction, would be deflected by the gravitational attraction of the nearby Andes Mountains. However, the deflection was less than expected, which was attributed to the mountains having low-density roots that compensated for the mass of the mountains. In other words, the low-density mountain roots provided the buoyancy to support the weight of the mountains above the surrounding terrain. Similar observations in the 19th century by British surveyors in India showed that this was a widespread phenomenon in mountainous areas. It was later found that the difference between the measured local gravitational field and what was expected for the altitude and local terrain (the Bouguer anomaly) is positive over ocean basins and negative over high continental areas. This shows that the low elevation of ocean basins and high elevation of continents is also compensated at depth.[7]

The American geologist Clarence Dutton coined the term 'isostasy' in 1882 to describe this general phenomenon.[4][5][6] However, two hypotheses to explain the phenomenon had by then already been proposed, in 1855, one by George Airy and the other by John Henry Pratt.[8] The Airy hypothesis was later refined by the Finnish geodesist Veikko Aleksanteri Heiskanen and the Pratt hypothesis by the American geodesist John Fillmore Hayford.[3]

Both the Airy-Heiskanen and Pratt-Hayford hypotheses assume that isostacy reflects a local hydrostatic balance. A third hypothesis, lithospheric flexure, takes into account the rigidity of the Earth's outer shell, the lithosphere.[9] Lithospheric flexure was first invoked in the late 19th century to explain the shorelines uplifted in Scandinavia following the melting of continental glaciers at the end of the last glaciation. It was likewise used by American geologist G. K. Gilbert to explain the uplifted shorelines of Lake Bonneville.[10] The concept was further developed in the 1950s by the Dutch geodesist Vening Meinesz.[3]

Models

Three principal models of isostasy are used:[3][11]

  1. The Airy–Heiskanen model – where different topographic heights are accommodated by changes in crustal thickness, in which the crust has a constant density
  2. The Pratt–Hayford model – where different topographic heights are accommodated by lateral changes in rock density.
  3. The Vening Meinesz, or flexural isostasy model – where the lithosphere acts as an elastic plate and its inherent rigidity distributes local topographic loads over a broad region by bending.

Airy and Pratt isostasy are statements of buoyancy, but flexural isostasy is a statement of buoyancy when deflecting a sheet of finite elastic strength. In other words, the Airy and Pratt models are purely hydrostatic, taking no account of material strength, while flexural isostacy takes into account elastic forces from the deformation of the rigid crust. These elastic forces can transmit buoyant forces across a large region of deformation to a more concentrated load.

Perfect isostatic equilibrium is possible only if mantle material is in rest. However, thermal convection is present in the mantle. This introduces viscous forces that are not accounted for the static theory of isostacy. The isostatic anomaly or IA is defined as the Bouger anomaly minus the gravity anomaly due to the subsurface compensation, and is a measure of the local departure from isostatic equilibrium. At the center of a level plateau, it is approximately equal to the free air anomaly.[12] Models such as deep dynamic isostasy (DDI) include such viscous forces and are applicable to a dynamic mantle and lithosphere.[13] Measurements of the rate of isostatic rebound (the return to isostatic equilibrium following a change in crust loading) provide information on the viscosity of the upper mantle.[14]

Airy

Airy isostasy, in which a constant-density crust floats on a higher-density mantle, and topography is determined by the thickness of the crust.
Airy isostasy, in which a constant-density crust floats on a higher-density mantle, and topography is determined by the thickness of the crust.
Airy isostasy applied to a real-case basin scenario, where the total load on the mantle is composed by a crustal basement, lower-density sediments and overlying marine water
Airy isostasy applied to a real-case basin scenario, where the total load on the mantle is composed by a crustal basement, lower-density sediments and overlying marine water

The basis of the model is Pascal's law, and particularly its consequence that, within a fluid in static equilibrium, the hydrostatic pressure is the same on every point at the same elevation (surface of hydrostatic compensation):[3][8]

h1⋅ρ1 = h2⋅ρ2 = h3⋅ρ3 = ... hn⋅ρn

For the simplified picture shown, the depth of the mountain belt roots (b1) is calculated as follows:

where is the density of the mantle (ca. 3,300 kg m−3) and is the density of the crust (ca. 2,750 kg m−3). Thus, generally:

b1 ≅ 5⋅h1

In the case of negative topography (a marine basin), the balancing of lithospheric columns gives:

where is the density of the mantle (ca. 3,300 kg m−3), is the density of the crust (ca. 2,750 kg m−3) and is the density of the water (ca. 1,000 kg m−3). Thus, generally:

b2 ≅ 3.2⋅h2

Pratt

For the simplified model shown the new density is given by: , where is the height of the mountain and c the thickness of the crust.[3][15]

Vening Meinesz / flexural

Cartoon showing the isostatic vertical motions of the lithosphere (grey) in response to a vertical load (in green)
Cartoon showing the isostatic vertical motions of the lithosphere (grey) in response to a vertical load (in green)

This hypothesis was suggested to explain how large topographic loads such as seamounts (e.g. Hawaiian Islands) could be compensated by regional rather than local displacement of the lithosphere. This is the more general solution for lithospheric flexure, as it approaches the locally compensated models above as the load becomes much larger than a flexural wavelength or the flexural rigidity of the lithosphere approaches zero.[3][9]

For example, the vertical displacement z of a region of ocean crust would be described by the differential equation

where and are the densities of the aesthenosphere and ocean water, g is the acceleration due to gravity, and is the load on the ocean crust. The parameter D is the flexural rigidity, defined as

where E is Young's modulus, is Poisson's ratio, and is the thickness of the lithosphere. Solutions to this equation have a characteristic wave number

As the rigid layer becomes weaker, approaches infinity, and the behavior approaches the pure hydrostatic balance of the Airy-Heiskanen hypothesis.[14]

Depth of compensation

The depth of compensation (also known as the compensation level, compensation depth, or level of compensation) is the depth below which the pressure is identical across any horizontal surface. In stable regions, it lies in the deep crust, but in active regions, it may lie below the base of the lithosphere.[16] In the Pratt model, it is the depth below which all rock has the same density; above this depth, density is lower where topographic elevation is greater.[17]

Implications

Deposition and erosion

When large amounts of sediment are deposited on a particular region, the immense weight of the new sediment may cause the crust below to sink. Similarly, when large amounts of material are eroded away from a region, the land may rise to compensate. Therefore, as a mountain range is eroded, the (reduced) range rebounds upwards (to a certain extent) to be eroded further. Some of the rock strata now visible at the ground surface may have spent much of their history at great depths below the surface buried under other strata, to be eventually exposed as those other strata eroded away and the lower layers rebounded upwards.[18]

An analogy may be made with an iceberg, which always floats with a certain proportion of its mass below the surface of the water. If snow falls to the top of the iceberg, the iceberg will sink lower in the water. If a layer of ice melts off the top of the iceberg, the remaining iceberg will rise. Similarly, Earth's lithosphere "floats" in the asthenosphere.[8][19]

Continental collisions

When continents collide, the continental crust may thicken at their edges in the collision. It is also very common for one of the plates to be underthrust beneath the other plate. The result is that the crust in the collision zone becomes as much as 80 kilometers (50 mi) thick, [20] versus 40 kilometers (25 mi) for average continental crust.[21] As noted above, the Airy hypothesis predicts that the resulting mountain roots will be about five times deeper than the height of the mountains, or 32 km versus 8 km. In other words, most of the thickened crust moves downwards rather than up, just as most of an iceberg is below the surface of the water.

However, convergent plate margins are tectonically highly active, and their surface features are partially supported by dynamic horizontal stresses, so that they are not in complete isostatic equilibrium. These regions show the highest isostatic anomalies on the Earth's surface.[22]

Mid-ocean ridges

Mid-ocean ridges are explained by the Pratt hypothesis as overlying regions of unusually low density in the upper mantle.[22] This reflects thermal expansion from the higher temperatures present under the ridges.[23]

Basin and Range

In the Basin and Range Province of western North America, the isostatic anomaly is small except near the Pacific coast, indicating that the region is generally near isostatic equilibrium. However, the depth to the base of the crust does not strongly correlate with the height of the terrain. This provides evidence (via the Pratt hypothesis) that the upper mantle in this region is inhomogeneous, with significant lateral variations in density.[22]

Ice sheets

Main article: Post-glacial rebound

The formation of ice sheets can cause Earth's surface to sink. Conversely, isostatic post-glacial rebound is observed in areas once covered by ice sheets that have now melted, such as around the Baltic Sea and Hudson Bay. As the ice retreats, the load on the lithosphere and asthenosphere is reduced and they rebound back towards their equilibrium levels. In this way, it is possible to find former sea cliffs and associated wave-cut platforms hundreds of metres above present-day sea level. The rebound movements are so slow that the uplift caused by the ending of the last glacial period is still continuing.[18]

In addition to the vertical movement of the land and sea, isostatic adjustment of the Earth also involves horizontal movements.[24] It can cause changes in Earth's gravitational field[25] and rotation rate, polar wander,[26] and earthquakes.[27]

Lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary

The hypothesis of isostasy is often used to determine the position of the lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary (LAB).[28]

See also

References

  1. ^ 33.Spasojevic, S., and Gurnis, M., 2012, Sea level and vertical motion of continents from dynamic Earth models since the Late Cretaceous: American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, v. 96, no. 11, p. 2037–2064.
  2. ^ 13. Foulger, G.R., Pritchard, M.J., Julian, B.R., Evans, J.R., Allen, R.M., Nolet, G., Morgan, W.J., Bergsson, B.H., Erlendsson, P., Jakobsdottir, S., Ragnarsson, S., Stefansson, R., Vogfjord, K., 2000. The seismic anomaly beneath Iceland extends down to the mantle transition zone and no deeper. Geophys. J. Int. 142, F1–F5.
  3. ^ a b c d e f g Watts, A. B. (2001). Isostasy and flexure of the lithosphere. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0521622727.
  4. ^ a b Dutton, Clarence (1882). "Physics of the Earth's crust; discussion". American Journal of Science. 3. 23 (April): 283–290. Bibcode:1882AmJS...23..283D. doi:10.2475/ajs.s3-23.136.283. S2CID 128904689.
  5. ^ a b Orme, Antony (2007). "Clarence Edward Dutton (1841–1912): soldier, polymath and aesthete". Geological Society, London, Special Publications. 287 (1): 271–286. Bibcode:2007GSLSP.287..271O. doi:10.1144/SP287.21. S2CID 128576633.}
  6. ^ a b Longwell, Chester R. (1958). "Clarence Edward Dutton" (PDF). Washington D.C.: National Academy of Sciences. Retrieved 24 March 2022.
  7. ^ Kearey, P.; Klepeis, K.A.; Vine, F.J. (2009). Global tectonics (3rd ed.). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. p. 42. ISBN 9781405107778.
  8. ^ a b c Kearey, Klepeis & Vine 2009, p. 43.
  9. ^ a b Kearey, Klepeis & Vine 2009, pp. 44–45.
  10. ^ Gilber, G.K. (1890). "Lake Bonneville". U.S. Geological Survey Monograph. 1. doi:10.3133/m1.
  11. ^ Kearey, Klepeis & Vine 2009, pp. 42–45.
  12. ^ Kearey, Klepeis & Vine 2009, pp. 45–48.
  13. ^ Czechowski, L. (2019). "Mantle Flow and Determining Position of LAB Assuming Isostasy". Pure and Applied Geophysics. 176 (6): 2451–2463. Bibcode:2019PApGe.tmp...45C. doi:10.1007/s00024-019-02093-8.
  14. ^ a b Kearey, Klepeis & Vine 2009, p. 45.
  15. ^ Kearey, Klepeis & Vine 2009, pp. 43–44.
  16. ^ Jackson, Julia A., ed. (1997). "depth of compensation". Glossary of geology (Fourth ed.). Alexandria, Viriginia: American Geological Institute. ISBN 0922152349.
  17. ^ Allaby, Michael (2013). "Pratt model". A dictionary of geology and earth sciences (Fourth ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780199653065.
  18. ^ a b Kearey, Klepeis & Vine 2009, pp. 45–46.
  19. ^ Monroe, James S. (1992). Physical geology : exploring the Earth. St. Paul: West Pub. Co. p. 305. ISBN 0314921958.
  20. ^ Kearey, Klepeis & Vine 2009, p. 322.
  21. ^ Kearey, Klepeis & Vine 2009, p. 19.
  22. ^ a b c Kearey, Klepeis & Vine 2009, p. 48.
  23. ^ Philpotts, Anthony R.; Ague, Jay J. (2009). Principles of igneous and metamorphic petrology (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. pp. 6–10. ISBN 9780521880060.
  24. ^ James, Thomas S.; Morgan, W. Jason (June 1990). "Horizontal motions due to post-glacial rebound". Geophysical Research Letters. 17 (7): 957–960. Bibcode:1990GeoRL..17..957J. doi:10.1029/GL017i007p00957.
  25. ^ Alexander, J. C. (November 1983). "Higher harmonic effects of the Earth's gravitational field from post-glacial rebound as observed by Lageos". Geophysical Research Letters. 10 (11): 1085–1087. Bibcode:1983GeoRL..10.1085A. doi:10.1029/GL010i011p01085.
  26. ^ Wahr, John; Dazhong, Han; Trupin, Andrew; Lindqvist, Varna (November 1993). "Secular changes in rotation and gravity: Evidence of post-glacial rebound or of changes in polar ice?". Advances in Space Research. 13 (11): 257–269. Bibcode:1993AdSpR..13k.257W. doi:10.1016/0273-1177(93)90228-4.
  27. ^ Davenport, Colin A.; Ringrose, Philip S.; Becker, Amfried; Hancock, Paul; Fenton, Clark (1989). "Geological Investigations of Late and Post Glacial Earthquake Activity in Scotland". Earthquakes at North-Atlantic Passive Margins: Neotectonics and Postglacial Rebound: 175–194. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-2311-9_11. ISBN 978-94-010-7538-1.
  28. ^ Grinč, M.; Zeyen, H.; Bielik, M. (2014). "Automatic 1D integrated geophysical modelling of lithospheric discontinuities: a case study from Carpathian-Pannonian Basin region". Contributions to Geophysics and Geodesy. 44 (2): 115–131. Bibcode:2014CoGG...44..115G. doi:10.2478/congeo-2014-0007. S2CID 129497623. Retrieved 13 December 2021.

Further reading