American judge
Jane Ann Restani (born February 27, 1948, in San Francisco, California) is a senior United States Judge of the United States Court of International Trade. She was appointed to the Court on November 16, 1983, by President Ronald Reagan. She served as Chief Judge of the Court from 2003 to 2010.
Early life and education
Born in San Francisco, California, Restani graduated first in her class in 1966 from Mercy High School, in San Francisco. She received a Bachelor of Arts degree in 1969 in political science, cum laude, from the University of California, Berkeley, where she was a member of the Tower and Flame Honor Society. She received teaching credentials in 1970 from the University of California, Berkeley. In 1973, she received her Juris Doctor (fifth in her class) at the University of California, Davis School of Law.[3] She was a law review staff writer in her second year, and articles editor in her third. She was a member of the Order of the Coif and Phi Kappa Phi.[4]
Department of Justice career
She was admitted to practice law in California in 1973 and began her legal career in the Civil Division of the Justice Department, where she served as a trial attorney from 1973 to 1976. She served as assistant chief of the Commercial Litigation Branch of the Civil Division from 1976 to 1980. She served as Director of the Commercial Litigation Branch of the Civil Division from 1980 to 1983.[4][3]
Trade Court service
On November 3, 1983, President Reagan nominated Restani to serve as a Judge of the United States Court of International Trade, to the seat vacated by Judge Herbert N. Maletz. She was confirmed by the United States Senate on November 15, 1983, and received her commission the following day. She served as the Chief Judge from November 1, 2003, to November 1, 2010. She assumed senior status on March 1, 2015.[3]
Notable decisions
In 2006, Restani sat by designation on a United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit panel hearing Bill Graham Archives v. Dorling Kindersley, Ltd., in which the plaintiff appealed a holding that the defendant's unlicensed use of several images of Grateful Dead concert posters in its coffee-table history of the band was fair use and not copyright infringement. Restani wrote the unanimous opinion affirming the district court, holding that since the images had been used transformatively, the archives could not assert market harm, and that the publisher's negotiations for a licensing fee did not foreclose them from later asserting fair use.[5]
Views on Wikipedia
In the case BP Products North America v. US, Court No. 06-00184, Restani wrote, "Based on the ability of any user to alter Wikipedia, the court is skeptical of it as a consistently reliable source of information. At this time, therefore, the court does not accept Wikipedia for the purposes of judicial notice."
