The examples and perspective in this article deal primarily with the UK and Ireland and do not represent a worldwide view of the subject. You may improve this article, discuss the issue on the talk page, or create a new article, as appropriate. (April 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Jury tampering is the crime of unduly attempting to influence the composition or decisions of a jury during the course of a trial. The means by which this crime could be perpetrated can include attempting to discredit potential jurors to ensure they will not be selected for duty. Once selected, jurors could be bribed or intimidated to act in a certain manner on duty. It could also involve making unauthorized contact with them for the purpose of introducing prohibited outside information and then arguing for a mistrial. In the United States, people have also been charged with jury tampering for handing out pamphlets and flyers indicating that jurors have certain rights and obligations, including an obligation to vote their conscience notwithstanding the instructions they are given by the judge.[1]

Republic of Ireland

In the Republic of Ireland, the Special Criminal Court is a three-judge, juryless court which tries cases based on a majority vote. Use of the Special Criminal Court is restricted to cases where "ordinary courts are inadequate to secure the effective administration of justice", and is allowed for by the Constitution of Ireland. While the power was initially created to prevent court cases being subverted by juries sympathetic to the defendant, the Special Criminal Court was established in 1972 to handle paramilitary cases resulting from the Troubles, when the risk of jury intimidation was high and there had also been a series of light sentences and acquittals by judges and juries sympathetic to the defendants.[2] It has since been used to try cases of high-profile gang leaders and other high-risk non-terrorism cases where normal juries risk intimidation or revenge.

United Kingdom

In Great Britain, the Criminal Justice Act 2003 allows for non-jury trials when there is danger of jury tampering, or where jury tampering has taken place.[3] On 18 June 2009, the Court of Appeal in England and Wales made a landmark ruling that resulted in the Lord Chief Justice, Lord Judge, allowing the first-ever criminal trial to be held without a jury by invoking Section 44 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003. The case in question involved four men accused of an armed robbery at Heathrow Airport in February 2004. After three juries either failed to reach verdicts or were discharged, the fourth trial of the case took place before a single judge, and ended on 31 March 2010 with guilty verdicts for all four accused.[4] The UK had previously established non-jury courts in Northern Ireland, known as Diplock Courts.

Levels of jury tampering were reported in 2002 to be a "major problem" by the deputy commissioner of the London Metropolitan Police[5] and in 2003 to be "worryingly high" in Merseyside by the then Chief Constable Norman Bettison and the then Home Secretary David Blunkett.[6]


See also


  1. ^ "Jury finds man guilty of jury tampering after passing out juror rights pamphlets". 1 June 2017. Retrieved 15 December 2017.
  2. ^ Ó Faoleán, Gearóid (2019). A Broad Church: The Provisional IRA in the Republic of Ireland, 1969–1980. Merrion Press. pp. 86–88. ISBN 978-1785372452.
  3. ^ CPS (10 January 2008). "Non Jury Trials: Legal Guidance". The Crown Prosecution Service. Retrieved 12 April 2009.
  4. ^ "Gang convicted of Heathrow raid". 31 March 2010 – via
  5. ^ "Cases of jury tampering soar". Independent. 29 December 2002. Retrieved 11 April 2018.
  6. ^ "Blunkett tackles jury tampering". BBC News. 18 November 2003. Retrieved 12 April 2009.
  7. ^ "Persistence paid off for jailed Dozier", Minden Press-Herald, 23 July 1984, p. 1
  8. ^ "Bill Sherman, "Louisiana ag chiefs: past and present", 3 July 2008" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 29 September 2013. Retrieved 1 May 2013.
  9. ^ "Hoffa faces eight years behind bars". BBC News. 12 March 1964. Retrieved 12 April 2009.
  10. ^ "Ex-Governor of West Virginia Pleads Guilty to Bribing Foreman of His Jury". The New York Times. 30 March 1971. p. 16. Retrieved 12 April 2009.
  11. ^ Lubasch, Arnold H. (7 November 1992). "Juror Is Convicted of Selling Vote to Gotti". The New York Times – via
  12. ^ "Jury bribe bid sees trial ruling". BBC News. 16 October 2007. Retrieved 12 April 2009.