.mw-parser-output .hidden-begin{box-sizing:border-box;width:100%;padding:5px;border:none;font-size:95%}.mw-parser-output .hidden-title{font-weight:bold;line-height:1.6;text-align:left}.mw-parser-output .hidden-content{text-align:left}You can help expand this article with text translated from the corresponding article in German. (May 2019) Click [show] for important translation instructions. View a machine-translated version of the German article. Machine translation, like DeepL or Google Translate, is a useful starting point for translations, but translators must revise errors as necessary and confirm that the translation is accurate, rather than simply copy-pasting machine-translated text into the English Wikipedia. Consider adding a topic to this template: there are already 8,946 articles in the main category, and specifying|topic= will aid in categorization. Do not translate text that appears unreliable or low-quality. If possible, verify the text with references provided in the foreign-language article. You must provide copyright attribution in the edit summary accompanying your translation by providing an interlanguage link to the source of your translation. A model attribution edit summary is Content in this edit is translated from the existing German Wikipedia article at [[:de:Limesfall]]; see its history for attribution. You should also add the template ((Translated|de|Limesfall)) to the talk page. For more guidance, see Wikipedia:Translation.
The hoard of Neupotz is directly linked to the plundering that took place after the Limesfall; hence it was also called the "Alemannian booty" (Alamannenbeute).

The Limesfall[1][2] is the name given to the abandonment of the Upper Germanic-Rhaetian Limes (built in 1st century) in the mid-3rd century AD by the Romans and the withdrawal of imperial troops from the provinces on the far side of the rivers Rhine and Danube to the line of those rivers. It is sometimes called the fall of the limes.[3]

As a result of a series of informative archaeological finds and the re-evaluation of literary sources, the Limesfall no longer appears to have been a simple historical event, but a multi-layered, complex phenomenon whose historical linkages have not yet been fully understood. Because written sources are largely absent or of dubious reliability, research often relies on archaeological findings, which can be interpreted differently.

In the past, the monocausal assumption was that the Romans had been forced by armed events and external aggressors in the context of the so-called Alamannic Storm to withdraw from the area east of the Rhine and north of the Danube. Archaeological finds, however, suggest that this process was the result of years of development during the so-called Crisis of the 3rd century with a decline of the border provinces; and even civil wars within the Empire seem to have played a role. All this finally led in 259/260 to the de facto abandonment of the so-called Agri Decumates territory and the withdrawal of the Roman military border to the Rhine and the Danube.[4][5]

References

  1. ^ Heeren, S. "The theory of "Limesfall" and the material culture of the late 3rd century" in Germania 94, 2016. pp. 185-209.
  2. ^ Collins, Rob and Frances McIntosh. Life in the Limes, Oxford: Oxbow, 2014, p. 23.
  3. ^ e.g. Wells, Peter S., How Ancient Europeans Saw the World, Princeton: PUP, 2012. p. 222.
  4. ^ Hans Ulrich Nuber: Staatskrise im 3. Jahrhundert. Die Aufgabe der rechtsrheinischen Gebiete. In: Imperium Romanum. Roms Provinzen an Neckar, Rhein und Donau. Esslingen, 2005, pp. 442–451, here p. 450.
  5. ^ Christian Witschel: Krise – Rezession – Stagnation? Der Westen des römischen Reiches im 3. Jahrhundert n. Chr. Frankfurt am Main, 1999, p. 210.

Literature

Categories