Narcissistic defenses are those processes whereby the idealized aspects of the self are preserved, and its limitations denied.[1] They tend to be rigid and totalistic.[2] They are often driven by feelings of shame and guilt, conscious or unconscious.[3]
enlisting the help of one or more of his or her codependent friends who will support his or her distorted view.
Freudians
Sigmund Freud
Sigmund Freud did not focus specifically on narcissistic defenses,[9] but did note in On Narcissism how "even great criminals and humorists, as they are represented in literature, compel our interest by the narcissistic consistency with which they manage to keep away from their ego anything that would diminish it".[10] Freud saw narcissistic regression as a defensive answer to object loss—denying the loss of an important object by way of a substitutive identification with it.[11]
Freud also considered social narcissism as a defence mechanism, apparent when communal identifications produce irrational panics at perceived threats to 'Throne and Altar' or 'Free Markets',[12] or in English over-reaction to any questioning of the status and identity of William Shakespeare.[13]
Fenichel
Otto Fenichel considered that "identification, performed by means of introjection, is the most primitive form of relationship to objects" a primitive mechanism only used "if the ego's function of reality testing is severely damaged by a narcissistic regression."[14]
Fenichel also highlighted "eccentrics who have more or less succeeded in regaining the security of primary narcissism and who feel 'Nothing can happen to me'....[failing] to give up the archaic stages of repudiating displeasure and to turn toward reality".[15]
Lacan
Jacques Lacan, following out Freud's view of the ego as the result of identifications,[16] came to consider the ego itself as a narcissistic defence, driven by what he called "the 'narcissistic passion' ...in the coming-into-being (devenir) of the subject".[17]
Kleinians
Melanie Klein, emphasised projective identification in narcissism, and the manic defence against becoming aware of the damage done to objects in this way.[18] For Kleinians, at the core of manic defences in narcissism stood what Hanna Segal called "a triad of feelings—control, triumph and contempt".[19]
Rosenfeld
Herbert Rosenfeld looked at the role of omnipotence, combined with projective identification, as a narcissistic means of defending against awareness of separation between ego and object.[20]
Object relations theory
In the wake of Klein, object relations theory, including particularly the American schools of Otto Kernberg and Heinz Kohut has explored narcissistic defences through analysis of such mechanisms as denial, projective identification, and extreme idealization.[21]
Kernberg emphasised the role of the splitting apart introjections, and identifications of opposing qualities, as a cause of ego weakness.[22] Kohut too stressed the fact in narcissism "vertical splits are between self-structures (among others)—'I am grand' and 'I am wretched'—with very little communication between them".[23]
Neville Symington however placed greater weight on the way "a person dominated by narcissistic currents...survives through being able to sense the emotional tone of the other...wearing the cloaks of others";[24] while for Spotnitz the key element is that the narcissist turns feelings in upon the self in narcissistic defense.[25]
Positive defenses
Kernberg emphasised the positive side to narcissistic defenses,[26] while Kohut also stressed the necessity in early life for narcissistic positions to succeed each other in orderly maturational sequences.[27]
Others like Symington would maintain that "it is a mistake to split narcissism into positive and negative...we do not get positive narcissism without self-hatred".[28]
Stigmatising attitude to psychiatric illness
Arikan found that a stigmatising attitude to psychiatric patients is associated with narcissistic defences.[29]
21st century
The twenty-first century has seen a distinction drawn between cerebral and somatic narcissists—the former building up their self-sense through intellectualism, the latter through an obsession with their bodies,[30] as with the woman who, in bad faith, invests her sense of freedom only in being an object of beauty for others.[31]
Literary parallels
Sir Philip Sidney is said to have seen poetry in itself as a narcissistic defense.[32]
Jean-Paul Sartre's aloof, detached protagonists have been seen as crude narcissists who preserve their sense of self only by petrifying it into solid form.[33]
^Shaw J.A. (1999). Sexual Aggression, American Psychiatric Publishing, pp. 28–9.
^Gerald Alper, Self Defence in a Narcissistic World (2003) p. 10
^Patrick Casement, Further Learning from the Patient (1990) p. 132
^Barry P.D., Farmer S. (2002). Mental Health and Mental Illness, p. 175.
^Lubit R (2002). "The long-term organizational impact of destructively narcissistic managers". Academy of Management Executive. 16 (1): 127–38. doi:10.5465/ame.2002.6640218.
^Wilber K., Engler J., Brown D. (1986). Transformations of Consciousness: Conventional and Contemplative Perspective of Development, Boston: New Science Library, New York City, NY, p. 150
Green, André, Life narcissism, death narcissism (Andrew Weller, Trans.), London and New York: Free Association Books (1983).
Grunberger, Béla (1971), Narcissism: Psychoanalytic essays (Joyce S. Diamanti, Trans., foreword by Marion M. Oliner). New York: International Universities Press.
Tausk, Viktor (1933), "On the origin of the "influencing machine" in schizophrenia" In Robert Fliess (Ed.), The psycho-analytic reader. New York: International Universities Press. (Original work published 1919)
