History
In 2002, the NGWF called for a country-wide strike in the Bangladeshi garment industry for September 1. Demands included workers and union rights and health and safety issues.[6]
Following the collapse of a garment factory in Dhaka in 2005, NGWF organised a protest against unsafe work environments in Dhaka, together with Jatiya Sramik Federation, Bangladesh Garment Sramik Federation and Bangladesh Jatiyatabadi Garments Workers Federation.[7] NGWF again organised a rally in Dhaka following the 2012 garment factory fire in Dhaka, in which 125 workers lost their lives. They again called for more work place safety as well as compensation for the families of the deceased and the payment of medical bills.[8]
NGWF together with other unions organised the campaign that led to an increase of the minimum wage for garment workers to 3,000 taka (~€29,6/$35,49) in 2010.[9] The union at that time said this was still far from sufficient and continued to demand a living wage.[10] Three years later, NGWF together with the Alternative Movement for Resources and Freedom Society conducted a survey that found the average monthly expenditure of working families was 4 times as high as the 2010 minimum wage.[11]
NGWF's president Amirul Haque Amin was awarded the Nuremberg International Human Rights Award for his work as an advocate of workers' rights in 2015.[12] In an interview, Amin said the prize was a recognition of Bangladesh's trade union and garment workers' movement and a show of respect for the dead of the 2005 and 2012 disasters.[13]
In June 2016, the factory of Bangladeshi garment company Tejgaon Textile was closed down after a Bangladesh Accord inspection had identified major structural faults in the building. Workers were left without salaries and festival bonus for the upcoming Eid al-Fitr. NGWF organised protests and filed a complaint at the Bangladesh Garment Manufacturers and Exporters Association (BGMEA), following which a compensation and an Eid bonus were paid out. In the same month, NGWF workers protested against and stopped the relocation of the factories of Ananta Apparels and Ananta Fashion, which would have endangered 6,000 jobs.[14]
In 2017, NGWF conducted a survey of garment factories producing for H&M that in more than a dozen factories found problems such as oral terminations without reason, no maternity leave and physical violence in response to complaints about bad working conditions.[15] NGWF and IndustriALL also campaigned for the release of detained workers and trade unionists in the run-up to that year's Dhaka Apparel Summit. 2 days before the summit started, labour ministry, BGMEA and unions reached an agreement to release the detainees. NGWF President Amin was present when State Minister of Labour Mujibul Haque publicly announced the agreement while describing the detained protestors as "vandals". H&M, Inditex, C&A, Next and Tchibo, who had earlier said they would boycott the Summit, agreed not to do so. According to Ashraf and Prentice, workers' safety was "considered to be a settled issue" at the Summit.[16]
In January 2019, garment workers again demanded an increase of the minimum wage. After eight days of protests including workers burning vehicles and blocking roads as well as police using tear gas shells and water cannons, the minimum wage was modestly increased. NGWF said it did not approve of the "anarchy" of the protests and welcomed the revised wage structure.[17] At the same time, NGWF condemned that workers who had taken part in the protest were laid off and more than 100 arrested.[18] In August, NGWF organised protests demanding the reinstatement of 12,436 workers fired during the January protests and a withdrawal of police cases against 7,458 workers.[19]
In 2020, NGWF organised protests calling for the payment of due wages and the reopening of factories closed without paying workers.[20][21] In October, the representative of IndustriALL Bangladesh Council, with which NGWF is affiliated, resigned from a tripartite committee formed with government and BGMEA to review labour rules. He said he had been excluded from the latest meetings and threatened protests if labour rules were adjusted without worker representation.[22]
