An editor has nominated this article for deletion.You are welcome to participate in the deletion discussion, which will decide whether or not to retain it.Feel free to improve the article, but do not remove this notice before the discussion is closed. For more information, see the guide to deletion.Find sources: "National Law School of India Review" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR%5B%5BWikipedia%3AArticles+for+deletion%2FNational+Law+School+of+India+Review%5D%5DAFD
This article relies excessively on references to primary sources. Please improve this article by adding secondary or tertiary sources. Find sources: "National Law School of India Review" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (November 2008) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
National Law School of India Review
DisciplineLaw
LanguageEnglish
Edited byKopal Mital
Publication details
Former name(s)
Student Bar Review
History1988 - present
Publisher
Student Advocate Committee, National Law School of India University, Bangalore (India)
FrequencyAnnually
Yes
Standard abbreviations
ISO 4Natl. Law Sch. India Rev.
Links

The National Law School of India Review is a student-run, peer-reviewed, bi-annual law review published by the Student Advocate Committee of the National Law School of India University.[1]

History

The journal was established in 1988 as the Student Bar Review. It obtained its current name in 2007. Notable authors include Justice B.N. Srikrishna (former Judge, Supreme Court of India), Rajeev Dhawan, Fali Nariman, and P.P. Rao (senior advocates).

Citations

The journal has been cited in various publications and the only student-run journal to be cited by the Supreme Court of India in cases of Action Committee, Un-Aided Pvt. Schools & Ors.Vs. Director of Education, Delhi, the Right to Privacy verdict and Union of India v. M/s Mohit Minerals.[2][3][4]

See also

References

  1. ^ "Home | National Law School of India Review". NLSIR. Retrieved 2023-01-07.
  2. ^ "Action Committee, Un-Aided Pvt. Schools & Ors. ...Petitioners Versus Director of Education, Delhi & Ors. ...Respondents" (PDF). Supreme Court of India: 22. It is also of some interest to note that opinions in the academic field are being expressed that res extra commercium is an expression wrongly used in the last sixty years by this Court and other High Courts. No activity can be called "res extra commercium". It is either permitted or not. Having regard to its conceptual roots to Roman law, it would mean only those things which are not incapable of being ownership and, thus, any matter which is res extra commercium were things incapable of ownership be vests in res in commercio. [See Arvind Datar, "Privilege, Police Power and Res Extra Commercium – Glaring Conceptual Errors" 21(1) National Law School of India Review 133 (2009)]
  3. ^ "Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) & Anr. vs Union Of India & Ors. (2017)" (PDF). Supreme Court of India: 53.
  4. ^ Union of India & Anr. v. M/s Mohit Minerals Pvt. Ltd. Through Director. Supreme Court of India. 2022. p. 75.

External links

Categories