The neutrinoless double beta decay (0νββ) is a commonly proposed and experimentally pursued theoretical radioactive decay process that would prove a Majorana nature of the neutrino particle.[1][2] To this day, it has not been found.[2][3][4]

The discovery of the neutrinoless double beta decay could shed light on the absolute neutrino masses and on their mass hierarchy (Neutrino mass). It would mean the first ever signal of the violation of total lepton number conservation.[5] A Majorana nature of neutrinos would confirm that the neutrino's own antiparticle is no different than itself, i.e. it is its own antiparticle.[6]

To search for neutrinoless double beta decay, there are currently a number of experiments underway, with several future experiments for increased sensitivity proposed as well.[7]

Historical development of the theoretical discussion

Back in 1939, Wendell H. Furry proposed the idea of the Majorana nature of the neutrino, which was associated with beta decays.[8] Furry stated the transition probability to even be higher for the neutrinoless double beta decay.[8] It was the first idea proposed to search for the violation of lepton number conservation.[1] It has, since then, drawn attention to it for being useful to study the nature of neutrinos (see quote).

[T]he 0ν mode [...] which violates the lepton number and has been recognized since a long time as a powerful tool to test neutrino properties.
— Oliviero Cremonesi[9]

The Italian physicist Ettore Majorana first introduced the concept of a particle being its own antiparticle.[6] Particles' nature was subsequently named after him as Majorana particles. The neutrinoless double beta decay is one method to search for the possible Majorana nature of neutrinos.[5]

Ettore Majorana, the first to introduce the idea of particles and antiparticles being identical.[6]
Ettore Majorana, the first to introduce the idea of particles and antiparticles being identical.[6]

Physical relevance

Conventional double beta decay

Neutrinos are conventionally produced in weak decays.[5] Weak beta decays normally produce one electron (or positron), emit an antineutrino (or neutrino) and increase the nucleus' proton number by one. The nucleus' mass (i.e. binding energy) is then lower and thus more favorable. There exists a number of elements that can decay into a nucleus of lower mass, but they cannot emit one electron only because the resulting nucleus is kinematically (that is, in terms of energy) not favorable (its energy would be higher).[2] These nuclei can only decay by emitting two electrons (that is, via double beta decay). There are about a dozen confirmed cases of nuclei that can only decay via double beta decay.[2] The corresponding decay equation is:


It is a weak process of second order.[2] A simultaneous decay of two nucleons in the same nucleus is extremely unlikely. Thus, the experimentally observed lifetimes of such decay processes are in the range of years.[10] A number of isotopes have been observed already to show this two-neutrino double beta decay.[3]

This conventional double beta decay is allowed in the Standard Model of particle physics.[3] It has thus both a theoretical and an experimental foundation.


Feynman diagram of neutrinoless double beta decay. Here two neutrons decay into two protons and two electrons, but no neutrino is in the final state. The existence of this mechanism would require the neutrinos to be Majorana particles.[11]
Feynman diagram of neutrinoless double beta decay. Here two neutrons decay into two protons and two electrons, but no neutrino is in the final state. The existence of this mechanism would require the neutrinos to be Majorana particles.[11]

If the nature of the neutrinos is Majorana, then they can be emitted and absorbed in the same process without showing up in the corresponding final state.[3] As Dirac particles, both the neutrinos produced by the decay of the W bosons would be emitted, and not absorbed after.[3]

The neutrinoless double beta decay can only occur if

The simplest decay process is known as the light neutrino exchange.[3] It features one neutrino emitted by one nucleon and absorbed by another nucleon (see figure to the right). In the final state, the only remaining parts are the nucleus (with its changed proton number ) and two electrons:


The two electrons are emitted quasi-simultaneously.[10]

The two resulting electrons are then the only emitted particles in the final state and must carry approximately the difference of the sums of the binding energies of the two nuclei before and after the process as their kinetic energy.[12] The heavy nuclei do not carry significant kinetic energy. The electrons will be emitted back-to-back due to momentum conservation.[12]

In that case, the decay rate can be calculated with


where denotes the phase space factor, the (squared) matrix element of this nuclear decay process (according to the Feynman diagram), and the square of the effective Majorana mass.[5]

First, the effective Majorana mass can be obtained by


where are the Majorana neutrino masses (three neutrinos ) and the elements of the neutrino mixing matrix (see PMNS matrix).[7] Contemporary experiments to find neutrinoless double beta decays (see section on experiments) aim at both the proof of the Majorana nature of neutrinos and the measurement of this effective Majorana mass (can only be done if the decay is actually generated by the neutrino masses).[7]

The nuclear matrix element (NME) cannot be measured independently;[why?] it must, but also can, be calculated.[13] The calculation itself relies on sophisticated nuclear many-body theories and there exist different methods to do this. The NME differs also from nucleus to nucleus (i.e. chemical element to chemical element). Today, the calculation of the NME is a significant problem and it has been treated by different authors in different ways. One question is whether to treat the range of obtained values for as the theoretical uncertainty and whether this is then to be understood as a statistical uncertainty.[7] Different approaches are being chosen here. The obtained values for often vary by factors of 2 up to about 5. Typical values lie in the range of from about 0.9 to 14, depending on the decaying nucleus/element.[7]

Lastly, the phase-space factor must also be calculated.[7] It depends on the total released kinetic energy (, i.e. "-value") and the atomic number . Methods utilize Dirac wave functions, finite nuclear sizes and electron screening.[7] There exist high-precision results for for various nuclei, ranging from about 0.23 (for ), and 0.90 () to about 24.14 ().[7]

It is believed that, if neutrinoless double beta decay is found under certain conditions (decay rate compatible with predictions based on experimental knowledge about neutrino masses and mixing), this would indeed "likely" point at Majorana neutrinos as the main mediator (and not other sources of new physics).[7] There are 35 nuclei that can undergo neutrinoless double beta decay (according to the aforementioned decay conditions).[3]

Experiments and results

Nine different candidates of nuclei are being considered in experiments to confirm neutrinoless double beta-decay: .[3] They all have arguments for and against their use in an experiment. Factors to be included and revised are natural abundance, reasonably priced enrichment, and a well understood and controlled experimental technique.[3] The higher the -value, the better are the chances of a discovery, in principle. The phase-space factor , and thus the decay rate, grows with .[3]

Experimentally of interest and thus measured is the sum of the kinetic energies of the two emitted electrons. It should equal the -value of the respective nucleus for neutrinoless double beta emission.[3]

The table shows a summary of the currently best limits on the lifetime of 0νββ. From this, it can be deduced that neutrinoless double beta decay is an extremely rare process - if it occurs at all.

Experimental limits (at least 90% C.I.)[7] on a collection of isotopes for 0νββ decay process mediated by the light neutrino mechanism, as shown in the Feynman diagram above.
Isotope Experiment lifetime [years]
Heidelberg-Moscow[14] [14]
GERDA [15]
KamLAND-Zen [16]

Heidelberg-Moscow collaboration

The so-called "Heidelberg-Moscow collaboration" (HDM; 1990-2003) of the German Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik and the Russian science center Kurchatov Institute in Moscow famously claimed to have found "evidence for neutrinoless double beta decay" (Heidelberg-Moscow controversy).[17][18] Initially, in 2001 the collaboration announced a 2.2σ, or a 3.1σ (depending on the used calculation method) evidence.[17] The decay rate was found to be around years.[3] This result has been topic of discussions between many scientists and authors.[3] To this day, no other experiment has ever confirmed or approved the result of the HDM group.[7] Instead, recent results from the GERDA experiment for the lifetime limit clearly disfavor and reject the values of the HDM collaboration.[7]

Neutrinoless double beta decay has not yet been found.[4]

GERDA (Germanium Detector Array) experiment

The GERDA collaboration's result of phase I of the detector was a limit of years (90% C.L.).[16] It used Germanium both as source and detector material.[16] Liquid argon was used for muon vetoing and as a shielding from background radiation.[16] The -value of Germanium for 0νββ decay is 2039 keV, but no excess of events in this region was found.[19] Phase II of the experiment started data-taking in 2015, and it used around 36 kg of Germanium for the detectors.[19] The exposure analyzed until July 2020 was 10.8 kg yr. Again, no signal was found and thus a new limit was set to years (90% C.L.).[20] The detector has stopped working and published its final results in December 2020. No neutrinoless double beta decay was observed.[15]

EXO (Enriched Xenon Observatory) experiment

The Enriched Xenon Observatory-200 experiment uses xenon both as source and detector.[16] The experiment is located in New Mexico (US) and uses a time-projection chamber (TPC) for three-dimensional spatial and temporal resolution of the electron track depositions.[16] The EXO-200 experiment yielded less sensitive results than GERDA I and II with a lifetime limit of years (90% C.L.).[16]

Currently data-taking experiments

Proposed/future experiments

See also


  1. ^ a b c d e Grotz, K.; Klapdor, H. V. (1990). The weak interaction in nuclear, particle, and astrophysics. Hilger. ISBN 978-0-85274-313-3.
  2. ^ a b c d e Oberauer, Lothar; Ianni, Aldo; Serenelli, Aldo (2020). Solar neutrino physics : the interplay between particle physics and astronomy. Wiley-VCH. pp. 120–127. ISBN 978-3-527-41274-7.
  3. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Rodejohann, Werner (2 May 2012). "Neutrino-less double beta decay and particle physics". International Journal of Modern Physics E. 20 (9): 1833–1930. arXiv:1106.1334. doi:10.1142/S0218301311020186. S2CID 119102859.
  4. ^ a b Deppisch, Frank F. (2019). A modern introduction to neutrino physics. Morgan & Claypool Publishers. ISBN 978-1-64327-679-3.
  5. ^ a b c d Patrignani et al. (Particle Data Group), C. (October 2016). "Review of Particle Physics". Chinese Physics C. 40 (10): 647. Bibcode:2016ChPhC..40j0001P. doi:10.1088/1674-1137/40/10/100001.
  6. ^ a b c Majorana, Ettore (1937). "Teoria simmetrica dell'elettrone e del positrone". Il Nuovo Cimento. 14 (4): 171–184. Bibcode:1937NCim...14..171M. doi:10.1007/BF02961314. S2CID 18973190.
  7. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Bilenky, S. M.; Giunti, C. (11 February 2015). "Neutrinoless double-beta decay: A probe of physics beyond the Standard Model". International Journal of Modern Physics A. 30 (4n05): 1530001. arXiv:1411.4791. Bibcode:2015IJMPA..3030001B. doi:10.1142/S0217751X1530001X. S2CID 53459820.
  8. ^ a b Furry, W. H. (15 December 1939). "On Transition Probabilities in Double Beta-Disintegration". Physical Review. 56 (12): 1184–1193. Bibcode:1939PhRv...56.1184F. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.56.1184.
  9. ^ Cremonesi, Oliviero (April 2003). "Neutrinoless double beta decay: Present and future". Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements. 118: 287–296. arXiv:hep-ex/0210007. Bibcode:2003NuPhS.118..287C. doi:10.1016/S0920-5632(03)01331-8. S2CID 7298714.
  10. ^ a b Artusa, D. R.; Avignone, F. T.; Azzolini, O.; Balata, M.; Banks, T. I.; Bari, G.; Beeman, J.; Bellini, F.; Bersani, A.; Biassoni, M. (15 October 2014). "Exploring the neutrinoless double beta decay in the inverted neutrino hierarchy with bolometric detectors". The European Physical Journal C. 74 (10). arXiv:1404.4469. doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-3096-8.
  11. ^ a b Schechter, J.; Valle, J. W. F. (1 June 1982). "Neutrinoless double-beta decay in SU(2)×U(1) theories". Physical Review D. 25 (11): 2951–2954. Bibcode:1982PhRvD..25.2951S. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.25.2951. hdl:10550/47205.
  12. ^ a b Grotz & Klapdor 1990, p. 86.
  13. ^ Bilenky, S.M; Grifols, J.A (December 2002). "The possible test of the calculations of nuclear matrix elements of the (ββ)0ν-decay". Physics Letters B. 550 (3–4): 154–159. arXiv:hep-ph/0211101. Bibcode:2002PhLB..550..154B. doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(02)02978-7.
  14. ^ a b "The Heidelberg-Moscow Experiment with enriched 76Ge". Prof.Dr.H.V.Klapdor-Kleingrothaus. Retrieved 16 July 2020.
  15. ^ a b GERDA Collaboration; Agostini, M.; Araujo, G. R.; Bakalyarov, A. M.; Balata, M.; Barabanov, I.; Baudis, L.; Bauer, C.; Bellotti, E. (2020-12-17), "Final Results of GERDA on the Search for Neutrinoless Double-$\ensuremath{\beta}$ Decay", Physical Review Letters, vol. 125, no. 25, p. 252502, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.252502, retrieved 2021-11-19
  16. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Tornow, Werner (1 December 2014). "Search for Neutrinoless Double-Beta Decay". arXiv:1412.0734 [nucl-ex].
  17. ^ a b Klapdor-Kleingrothaus, H. V.; Dietz, A.; Harney, H. L.; Krivosheina, I. V. (21 November 2011). "Evidence for neutrinoless double beta decay". Modern Physics Letters A. 16 (37): 2409–2420. arXiv:hep-ph/0201231. doi:10.1142/S0217732301005825. S2CID 18771906.
  18. ^ Klapdor-Kleingrothaus H.V.; et al. (2004). "Search for neutrinoless double beta decay with enriched 76Ge in Gran Sasso 1990-2003". Physics Letters B. 586 (3–4): 198–212. arXiv:hep-ph/0404088. Bibcode:2004PhLB..586..198K. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2004.02.025.
  19. ^ a b Agostini, M.; Allardt, M.; Andreotti, E.; Bakalyarov, A. M.; Balata, M.; Barabanov, I.; Barnabé Heider, M.; Barros, N.; Baudis, L.; Bauer, C. (19 September 2013). "Results on Neutrinoless Double-Beta Decay of 76Ge from Phase I of the GERDA Experiment". Physical Review Letters. 111 (12): 122503. arXiv:1307.4720. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.122503. PMID 24093254.
  20. ^ Agostini, M; Allardt, M; Bakalyarov, A M; Balata, M; Barabanov, I; Baudis, L; Bauer, C; Bellotti, E; Belogurov, S; Belyaev, S T; Benato, G (September 2017). "First results from GERDA Phase II". Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 888 (1): 012030. Bibcode:2017JPhCS.888a2030A. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/888/1/012030.
  21. ^ Nutini, I. (24 February 2020). "The CUORE Detector and Results". Low Temp Phys. 199: 519. doi:10.1007/s10909-020-02402-9.
  22. ^ Adams, D.Q. (26 March 2020). "Improved Limit on Neutrinoless Double-Beta Decay in 130Te with CUORE". Physical Review Letters. 124 (12): 122501. arXiv:1912.10966. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.122501.
  23. ^ Adams, D. Q.; Alduino, C.; Alfonso, K.; Avignone, F. T.; Azzolini, O.; Bari, G.; Bellini, F.; Benato, G.; Beretta, M.; Biassoni, M.; Branca, A. (April 2022). "Search for Majorana neutrinos exploiting millikelvin cryogenics with CUORE". Nature. 604 (7904): 53–58. doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04497-4. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 35388194.
  24. ^ Becker, Adam (2022-04-06). "CUORE team places new limits on the bizarre behavior of neutrinos". News Center. Retrieved 2022-04-08.
  25. ^ a b "KamLAND-ZEN". Kavli IPMU-カブリ数物連携宇宙研究機構. 16 May 2014. Retrieved 17 July 2020.
  26. ^ "Investigating the Neutrino Mass Scale with the ultra-low background KamLAND-Zen detector". Retrieved 17 July 2020.
  27. ^ a b c C. Licciardi* on behalf of the EXO-200 and nEXO collaborations (2017). "Recent Results and Status of EXO-200 and the nEXO Experiment". 38th International Conference on High Energy Physics (ICHEP2016) - Neutrino Physics. 282: 494. doi:10.22323/1.282.0494.