This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages) This article does not cite any sources. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.Find sources: "No Love for Johnnie" novel – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (April 2019) (Learn how and when to remove this message) This article's tone or style may not reflect the encyclopedic tone used on Wikipedia. See Wikipedia's guide to writing better articles for suggestions. (February 2020) (Learn how and when to remove this message) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
First edition

No Love for Johnnie by Wilfred Fienburgh, was first published in 1959 by Hutchinson Heinemann. Essentially a political novel, it tells the story of the life of Johnny Byrne, described as a cynical and burnt-out politician whose career has ostensibly stalled due to his leftist leanings in a conservative Labour government. It was adapted into a film in 1961, which was directed by Ralph Thomas.

Overview

[edit]

Stylistically the novel belongs to the genre associated with John Osborne, John Braine, Shelagh Delaney and other realist writers who were to find their voices in the new wave of British "verismo" art forms. The narrative allows the reader to examine the internal conflicts that Johnnie Byrne negotiates as he attempts to find some merit in his desultory existence.[citation needed]

Under scrutiny are his relationships with his cold, politically driven wife, Alice, whose own politics are a point of contention for Johnnie. His neighbour, Mary and the young woman, Pauline illuminate Byrne's darker aspects. As a piece of literature, it may be considered light weight but re-readings will reveal a tight structure and a credible analysis of the way powerful individuals, the makers of social change, are paradoxically vulnerable ciphers in a world where they too may be ill-served by cupidity.

Even though the weak ending of his relationship with a much younger woman may seem clichéd and trite by twenty-first century standards, it is handled with a certain amount of legerdemain and irony so that it escapes being trite. There is a sense that Byrne lands on his feet by his very own inaction in political matters. By the novel's end, it is clear that Byrne himself has failed to influence his own life. and appears to be a pawn at the mercy of events around him.