This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages) The article's lead section may need to be rewritten. Please help improve the lead and read the lead layout guide. (May 2023) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) This article's lead section may be too long. Please read the length guidelines and help move details into the article's body. (May 2023) This article may lack focus or may be about more than one topic. Please help improve this article, possibly by splitting the article and/or by introducing a disambiguation page, or discuss this issue on the talk page. (May 2023) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)

Ohad Meromi
Born1967
Kibbutz Mizra, Israel
NationalityIsraeli
EducationBezalel Academy of Art and Design
Known forSculptor

Born in 1967 in Kibbutz Mizra, Israel, Ohad Meromi is an Israeli sculptor. He lives and works in Brooklyn, New York. In 2023, Meromi began representation with New York gallery, 56 Henry. [1]

His sculpture The Sunbather (an eight-foot-long, 4,000-pound bronze sculpture of a reclining human form, painted vibrant pink and costing an estimated $515,000, of which Meromi received $103,000) was chosen to be installed on Long Island City, a decision which evoked significant controversy, primarily because there was no community involvement in the process of its selection. A three-person panel that was composed of a member from Socrates Sculpture Park, SculptureCenter and a local artist selected the commission without input from Community Board 2 or the public was responsible for choosing it. Residents complained the sculpture was "too bright, too big, too ugly and too expensive".[1] One Community Board 2 Member said, “With art some people love it, some people hate it…but this looks like you dug up Gumby’s grandmother and threw it on the median.”[2] There were also concerns that both the size and the color of the sculpture could distract passing drivers and cause accidents. (“Chromophobia,” according to Meromi).[1] To resolve the dispute, a meeting was called, involving 300 residents, Cultural Affairs commissioner Tom Finkelpearl, City Council Member Jimmy Van Bramer and Meromi himself.[3][4][5][6]

In opposition to the sculpture, Hunt Rodriguez, an artist from Bushwick, Brooklyn, installed his own protest piece on Jackson Avenue: two conjoined and brightly painted wooden pyramids, one standing vertically and the other laid on its side, with a sign that read in part: “This is not against the artist. It is against the misuse of our tax dollars.” He explained that the standing pyramid represented “the love of the residents” and the fallen pyramid represented “the idea of the city doing something without the support of the community.”[1][7][8][9]

On 14 May 2015, the city council unanimously passed a bill that provided residents with more say before certain pieces of public art are installed. The bill was introduced by Vam Bramer. It amended the Department of Cultural Affairs’ Percent for Art Program, which was borne out of a 1982 law that requires that one percent of the budget for city-funded construction projects be spent on artwork.

The new bill requires the Department of Cultural affairs to notify the public via its website of its intention to install a piece of public art as part of the Percent for Art program.

However, a subsequent public meeting is now required allowing residents to speak with the panel’s recommended artists about their concepts, according to a spokesman for Van Bramer’s office. The bill also requires advance notification of these meetings, including online postings. [10]

The sculpture was approved at a Design Commission Meeting on 26 October 2015.[11][12][13][14]

Construction of the sculpture started on 3 August 2016.[15][16]The sculpture was permanently installed at the intersection of Jackson Avenue and 43rd Avenue by 15 November 2016. Almost immediately, Van Bramer fielded calls to remove the sculpture.[17]

The controversy led to the City Council passing a legislation package that overhauled the Percent for Art program (under which The Sunbather was selected), creating more transparency and accountability to the community during the process of commissioning a piece of public art. The legislation package contained six separate bills, four of which focus specifically on the Percent for Art program. The bills focusing on the Percent for Art program require that the panel deciding on Percent for Art commissions include representatives from the office of the Borough President, Community Board, and Council Member in whose district the project is located.

It also required the Department of Cultural Affairs (DCLA) to collect demographic data on the artists receiving commissions to encourage diversity and would require more outreach encouraging artists to apply for the program in the seven most common languages in New York City.

The legislation raised the cap on each Percent for Art project from $400,000 to $900,000 for projects under a certain threshold, and from $1.5 million to $4 million for projects over that threshold.

The other two bills in the package require reports from the Arts Commission and the Cultural Institutions groups to increase transparency.[18]

Education

Awards and prizes

Articles

References

  1. ^ a b c d Semple, Kirk (18 March 2015). "Outcry Over Pink Sculpture Intersects With Broader Questions in Long Island City". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 19 March 2023.
  2. ^ Murray, Christian (26 November 2014). "Big pink sculpture likely to go up on Jackson Ave, while LIC residents kept in the dark". LIC Post. Archived from the original on 26 January 2023. Retrieved 19 March 2023.
  3. ^ Martinez, Alanna (11 November 2016). "Pink 'Gumby' Finally Welcomed Home in Queens". Observer. Archived from the original on 2 December 2020. Retrieved 19 March 2023.
  4. ^ Murray, Christian (11 March 2015). "Following pink sculpture outcry, Van Bramer organizes Cultural Town Hall meeting". LIC Post. Archived from the original on 19 March 2023. Retrieved 19 March 2023.
  5. ^ Florio, Michael (20 March 2015). "Residents ask questions about selection process of pink sculpture, artists discuss affordable studio/apartment space". LIC Post. Archived from the original on 19 March 2023. Retrieved 19 March 2023.
  6. ^ "SC Conversations: Ohad Meromi". www.sculpture-center.org. Archived from the original on 7 December 2022. Retrieved 19 March 2023.
  7. ^ Nersesian, Arthur (12 December 2014). "Guerilla Sculpture Critiques Big-Budget Public Art Commission". Hyperallergic. Archived from the original on 11 August 2022. Retrieved 19 March 2023.
  8. ^ Sigler, Jeremy (1 April 2017). "The Trials of a Hot-Pink Sunbather". Hyperallergic. Archived from the original on 25 December 2022. Retrieved 19 March 2023.
  9. ^ Murray, Christian (12 December 2014). "Protest art has gone up, as opposition to the big pink sculpture builds". LIC Post. Archived from the original on 19 March 2023. Retrieved 19 March 2023.
  10. ^ Strawbridge, Jackie (17 May 2015). "Sparked by pink sculpture controversy, city council passes bill that aims to include the public in Public Art". LIC Post. Archived from the original on 19 March 2023. Retrieved 19 March 2023.
  11. ^ "Design Commission Meeting Agenda" (PDF). Government of New York City. Archived (PDF) from the original on 25 January 2022.
  12. ^ Strawbridge, Jackie (23 October 2015). "Pink sculpture quietly up for approval Monday". LIC Post. Archived from the original on 19 March 2023. Retrieved 19 March 2023.
  13. ^ Strawbridge, Jackie (4 November 2015). "Pink Sculpture Approved For Jackson Avenue, going up in 2016". LIC Post. Archived from the original on 16 May 2022. Retrieved 19 March 2023.
  14. ^ Strawbridge, Jackie (13 April 2016). "Pink Sculpture Coming In Late Summer". LIC Post. Archived from the original on 19 March 2023. Retrieved 19 March 2023.
  15. ^ Blog, The Court Square (3 August 2016). "Construction starts for pink sculpture 'Sunbather' on Jackson Avenue". The Court Square Blog. Archived from the original on 9 December 2022. Retrieved 19 March 2023.
  16. ^ Hannah, Wulkan (6 August 2016). "Work begins on controversial Pink Sculpture". LIC Post. Archived from the original on 26 November 2022. Retrieved 19 March 2023.
  17. ^ Wulkan, Hannah (15 November 2016). "Pink Sculpture is up, Van Bramer has already fielded calls wanting it down". LIC Post. Archived from the original on 15 January 2023. Retrieved 19 March 2023.
  18. ^ Wulkan, Hannah (18 January 2017). "City Council passes public art legislation, sparked by pink sculpture saga". LIC Post. Archived from the original on 24 September 2022. Retrieved 19 March 2023.

Sources

External links


Authority control databases
Categories