Major points
In On the Correct Handling of Contradictions Among the People, Mao discusses the contradictions still existing in socialist society. According to Mao:[3]: 168
In socialist society, the basic contradiction is still the contradiction between productive relations and productivity and between the superstructure and the economic foundation. However, these contradictions in socialist society are fundamentally different in nature and circumstances between those in the productive relations and productive forces of the old society and between the superstructure and the economic base.
Mao describes the contradictions in the old society as ones which could not be satisfied by capitalism itself and which required socialist revolution.[3]: 168 In contrast, contradictions within the socialist society could be handled by the people within the socialist system on a continuous basis.[3]: 168–169
The main point of On the Correct Handling of Contradictions Among the People was to make a distinction between contradictions among the people and contradictions between the people and the enemy and that these contradictions should be treated differently.[3]: 169 The text emphasized that correctly handling contradictions should be the major theme of national political life.[3]: 139
Contradictions among the people were not antagonistic.[5]: 95 To resolve contradictions among the people, it was necessary to use democratic methods, educational methods, and "unity-criticism-unity" methods.[3]: 169 Contradictions among the people should be addressed to prevent them from intensifying or becoming contradictions between the Party and the enemy.[3]: 169 Based on the experience of the United Front, On the Correct Handling of Contradictions Among the People explains that contradictions between the working class and the national bourgeoise of China generally fall within this category.[3]: 170 Mao also stated that intellectuals should be considered part of "the people" and should help give their concerns a voice.[5]: 95
Contradictions between the people and the enemy were antagonistic contradictions.[3]: 169
The slogan serve the people appears in On the Correct Handling of Contradictions Among the People, where Mao writes that "state organs must rely on the people, and the staff of state organs must serve the people."[2]: 115
Mao also discussed frugality and productivity in the economic development of China, writing, "It is a great contradiction for all cadres and all people to always think of our country as a big socialist country, but also a poor country with economic backwardness. To make our country prosperous and strong, it will take decades of frugal accumulation, including the implementation of hard work and thrift in economic construction."[2]: 102
Mao also wrote that the question of "which will win," socialism or capitalism, "has not been really resolved yet."[6]
Antagonistic contradiction
| Part of a series on |
| Maoism |
|---|
 |
(Chinese language: 矛盾)Antagonistic contradiction is the notion that compromise between different social classes is impossible, and their relations must be of class struggle. The term is most often applied in Maoist theory, which holds that differences between the two primary classes, the working class/proletariat and the bourgeoisie are so great that there is no way to bring about a reconciliation of their views. Because the groups involved have diametrically opposed concerns, their objectives are so dissimilar and contradictory that no mutually acceptable resolution can be found. Nonantagonistic contradictions may be resolved through mere debate, but antagonistic contradictions can only be resolved through struggle.
The term is usually attributed to Vladimir Lenin, although he may never have actually used the term in any of his written works.
In Maoism, the antagonistic contradiction was usually that between the peasantry and the landowning class. Mao Zedong expressed his views on the policy in his famous February 1957 speech "On the Correct Handling of Contradictions Among the People."
The Chinese term derives from the Han Feizi: "There was once a man in the state of Chu, who was selling shields and lances. He was praising them saying: “My shields are so firm, that there is nothing that can pierce them.” He praised his lances saying: “My lances are so sharp, that there is nothing that they cannot pierce.” Someone asked: “What if you used your lances to pierce your shields?” The man could not answer. A shield that cannot be pierced and a lance that can pierce everything cannot exist in the same world." (see: Irresistible force paradox)
