The paternal rights and abortion issue is an extension of both the abortion debate and the fathers' rights movement. Abortion can be a factor for disagreement and lawsuit between partners.


Roman law allowed induced abortions but regulated it in consideration of the biological father. Emperor Septimius Severus ruled circa 211 AD that a woman who had an abortion without consent from her husband should face exile for having bereaved her husband of children.[1][2]

In his speech Pro Cluentio, delivered in 66 BC, Cicero refers to a case he had heard of in which a woman from Miletus was sentenced to death for having aborted her pregnancy, upon receiving bribes from those who stood to inherit her husband's estate if he produced no heir. Cicero said that in doing so she had "destroyed the hope of the father, the memory of his name, the supply of his race, the heir of his family, a citizen intended for the use of the republic".[3]

A 4th century BC Greek writer from Alexandria, Egypt, Sopater, quoted the lawyer Lysias, who had referred to a trial in Athens in which a man named Antigene accused his wife of having deprived him of a son by having an abortion.[1]

Men and abortion in law

Whether a male has a legal right to advance his personal interest, whether it be toward abortion, fatherhood, or adoption, over that of the female, differs by region.

In 2011, it was reported that Indonesia, Malawi, Syria, United Arab Emirates, Equatorial Guinea, Kuwait, Maldives, Morocco, South Korea, Saudi Arabia, Japan, Taiwan and Turkey all had laws which required that an abortion first be authorized by the woman's husband.[4] However, in some countries, this stipulation could be bypassed or overridden if there is genuine concern for maternal health.[5]

Since Roe v. Wade, some states in the United States have attempted to enact laws requiring spousal consent. All of these laws have been ruled unconstitutional, spousal consent in the 1976 decision Planned Parenthood v. Danforth and spousal awareness in the 1992 decision Planned Parenthood v. Casey[6]

Legal cases

In China the husband of a woman who had an abortion filed a lawsuit against her in 2002 under a law intended to grant sexual equality in terms of childbearing and contraceptive decisions. The law stated that a woman has no overriding priority over her spouse in deciding whether to have a child.[7]

A number of legal cases have arisen in the Western world in which men have tried to prevent women with whom they had been sexually active from obtaining an abortion, all of which failed:

About men deciding to decline parenthood in the event of an unintended pregnancy and asking for a financial abortion:

Men who have tried to compel a woman to have an abortion:


Those who support a man's right to intervene in a woman's reproductive decisions, argue that it is unreasonable that, after fertilisation has occurred, women have several opportunities to legally opt out of pregnancy and parenthood (such as the morning after pill, abortion, adoption or safe haven laws) whereas men have none.[15] Armin Brott has said of this, "A woman can legally deprive a man of his right to become a parent or force him to become one against his will".[16] The man can essentially have the obligations of fatherhood, such as child support, forced upon him against his wishes. This could potentially apply even if conception was without his knowledge or consent, such as birth control sabotage, sperm theft or sexual assault of the man.[17][18]

Abortion vetoing

Men's rights and fathers' rights activists have argued that men should have veto power over their partners' decisions to abort.[19][20][21][22] Similarly, philosopher George W. Harris has written that, if a man impregnates a woman with the explicit goal of having a child, in a manner that is mutually consensual, then it would be morally unacceptable for that woman to later have an abortion.[23]

Those who object to men having a right to direct involvement argue that because it is the woman's body carrying the unborn baby, her determination for or against abortion should be the only one.[15][24] Marsha Garrison, a professor at Brooklyn Law School, stated that U.S. courts acknowledge "that embryo is in the woman's body, it is within her and can't be separated from her, so it's not just her decision-making about whether to bear a child, it's about her body".[25]

Abortion notification

A 2002 United States Gallup special report mentions only 38% of the population being opposed to notifying the husband of a married woman for an abortion.[26] In a 2003 Gallup poll, 72% of respondents were in favor of notification to the husband, with 26% opposed; of those polled, 79% of males and 67% of females responded in favor of notification inside married couples.[27]

Pregnancy vetoing

Bioethicist Jacob Appel has asked, "if one grants a man veto power over a woman's choice to have an abortion in cases where he is willing to pay for the child, why not grant him the right to demand an abortion where he is unwilling to provide for the child?"[28]

Opting out

Main article: Paper Abortion

In reference to cases in which men who do not desire to become fathers have been expected by the mother to pay child support, Melanie McCulley, a South Carolina attorney, in her 1998 article, "The Male Abortion: The Putative Father's Right to Terminate His Interests in and Obligations to the Unborn Child", set forth the theory of the "male abortion", in which she argues that men should be able to terminate their legal obligations to unwanted children.[15][17]

Opting in

It is also possible, rather than taking the stance that males should have the freedom to opt out of inherent responsibilities and rights, to take the stance that one must opt-in and agree to undertake those responsibilities to be compelled to follow them, and only through doing so, earn parental rights. This is what occurs during adoption.

See also


  1. ^ a b John M. Riddle (1992). Contraception and Abortion from the Ancient World to the Renaissance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  2. ^ "Timeline 3rd Century." (2003). The Ultimate Science Fiction Web Guide. Retrieved June 9, 2006.
  3. ^ Cicero. (66 BC). Pro Cluentio Archived 2006-06-01 at the Wayback Machine. (C.D. Yonge, Trans.). Retrieved June 9, 2006.
  4. ^[bare URL PDF]
  5. ^ Rahman, Anika; Katzive, Laura; Henshaw, Stanley K. (1998). "A Global Review of Laws on Induced Abortion, 1985–1997". International Family Planning Perspectives. 24 (2): 56–64. doi:10.2307/2991926. JSTOR 2991926. PMID 14627052.
  6. ^ "Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth". Legal Information Institute. Retrieved October 2, 2018.
  7. ^ Maximova, Vickie. "Chinese man sues wife over abortion." (March 20, 2002). BBC News. Retrieved May 26, 2006.
  8. ^ a b Nolan, David. "Should men have rights in abortion? Archived 2009-04-11 at the Wayback Machine." (March 21, 2001). Pro-Choice Forum. Retrieved May 26, 2006.
  9. ^ a b "Woman in Hone case has abortion." (March 30, 2001). British Pregnancy Advisory Services: Press Release. Retrieved May 29, 2006.
  10. ^ a b Thorpe, Mathew Alexander. (2000). Consent for Caesarean Section: Part 1 development of the law Archived 2006-06-21 at the Wayback Machine. Catholic Medical Quarterly. Retrieved May 29, 2006.
  11. ^ Brahams D (March 1987). "An action by putative father and unborn fetus to prevent termination". Lancet. 1 (8532): 576–7. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(87)90226-1. PMID 2881128. S2CID 7469770.
  12. ^ "Abortion for court fight woman." (March 26, 2001). BBC News. Retrieved May 26, 2006.
  13. ^ MATTHEW DUBAY v. LAUREN WELLS, an Individual, SAGINAW COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, by and through Michael D. Thomas, Prosecutor. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. 6 Nov. 2007. Us Courts. Web. <>
  14. ^ Court: 'Sperm theft' doesn't warrant forced termination
  15. ^ a b c Young, Cathy. (April 2003). "Aborting Equality: Men's Odd Place in the Abortion Debate." Reason. Retrieved June 11, 2007.
  16. ^ "Abortion and the father." (n.d.). BBC: Religion & Ethics. Retrieved May 26, 2006.
  17. ^ a b McCulley MG (1988). "The male abortion: the putative father's right to terminate his interests in and obligations to the unborn child". J Law Policy. 7 (1): 1–55. PMID 12666677.
  19. ^ Cahill, Charlotte (2010). "Men's Movement". In Chapman, Roger (ed.). Culture Wars: An Encyclopedia of Issues, Viewpoints, and Voices. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe. p. 355. ISBN 978-0-7656-1761-3.
  20. ^ Baker, Maureen (2006). Restructuring Family Policies: Convergences and Divergences. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. p. 95. ISBN 978-0-8020-8783-6.
  21. ^ Solinger, Rickie (2013). Reproductive Politics: What Everyone Needs to Know. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 130. ISBN 978-0-19-981141-0.
  22. ^ Drakich, Janice (1989). "In search of the better parent: The social construction of ideologies of fatherhood". Canadian Journal of Women and the Law. 3 (1): 69–87. In the case of abortion, fathers' rightists are accusing women of denying fathers' paternal instincts and are lobbying for fathers' rights to veto abortion decisions.
  23. ^ Harris GW (April 1986). "Fathers and fetuses". Ethics. 96 (3): 594–603. doi:10.1086/292777. PMID 11658724. S2CID 34176830.
  24. ^ Wiley, Keith. (April 2001). "Abortion and Men's Reproductive Rights Archived 2012-07-30 at" Retrieved June 11, 2006.
  25. ^ Pam Belluck. "The Right to Be a Father (or Not)." (November 6, 2005). The New York Times. Retrieved June 11, 2007.
  26. ^ "Public Opinion About Abortion — An In-Depth Review." Lydia Saad. January 22, 2002.
  27. ^ The Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. (2005-11-02). "Public Opinion Supports Alito on Spousal Notification Even as It Favors Roe v. Wade." Pew Research Center Pollwatch. Retrieved 2014-10-16.
  28. ^ Appel, Jacob M. “Women’s Rights, Men’s Bodies,” New York Times, December 2, 2005