Radiographic classification of osteoarthritis
PurposeQuantify the degree of osteoarthritis
Based onMedical imaging

Radiographic systems to classify osteoarthritis vary by which joint is being investigated. In osteoarthritis, the choice of treatment is based on pain and decreased function, but radiography can be useful before surgery in order to prepare for the procedure.

Vertebral column

There are many grading systems for degeneration of intervertebral discs and facet joints in the cervical and lumbar vertebrae, of which the following radiographic systems can be recommended in terms of interobserver reliability:[1]

Kellgren grading of cervical disc degeneration[2]
I
  • Minimal anterior osteophytosis
II
  • Definite anterior osteophytosis
  • Possible disc space narrowing
  • Some endplate sclerosis
III
  • Moderate disc space narrowing
  • Definite endplate sclerosis
  • Osteophytosis
IV
  • Severe disc space narrowing
  • Endplate sclerosis
  • Multiple large osteophytes.
Lane grading of lumbar disc degeneration[1]
Grade Joint space narrowing Osteophytes Sclerosis
0 None None None
1 Definite but mild narrowing Small Present
2 Moderate Moderate –
3 Severe (complete joint space loss) Large –

The Thomson grading system is regarded to have more academic than clinical value.[1]

Thomson grading of lumbar disc degeneration[1]
Grade Nucleus Anulus Endplate Vertebral body
I Bulging gel Discrete fibrous laminae Hyaline, uniform thickness Rounded margins
II Peripheral white fibrous tissue Mucinous material between laminae Irregular thickness Pointed margins
III Consolidated fibrous tissue Extensive mucinous infiltration; loss of annular-nuclear demarcation Focal defects in cartilage Small chondrophytes or osteophytes at margins
IV Horizontal clefts parallel to endplate Focal disruptions Fibrocartilage extending from subchondral bone; irregularity and focal sclerosis in subchondral bone Osteophytes smaller than 2 mm
V Clefts extended through nucleus and annulus Diffuse sclerosis Osteophytes greater than 2 mm

Shoulder

The Samilson–Prieto classification is preferable for osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint.[3]

Samilson–Prieto classification[4]
Grade Description
Mild Exostosis of inferior humerus and/or glenoid measuring less than 3 mm
Moderate Exostosis of inferior humerus and/or glenoid measuring 3–7 mm, and slight irregularity of the joint
Severe Exostosis of inferior humerus and/or glenoid measuring more than 7 mm in height as well as sclerosis and narrowing of the joint space (normal joint space is 4–5 mm).[5]

Hip

Hip joint with no signs of osteoarthritis.

The most commonly used radiographic classification system for osteoarthritis of the hip joint is the Kellgren–Lawrence system (or KL system).[6] It uses plain radiographs.

Kellgren–Lawrence system
Grade Description
0 No radiographic features of osteoarthritis
1 Possible joint space narrowing (normal joint space is at least 2 mm at the superior acetabulum)[7] and osteophyte formation
2 Definite osteophyte formation with possible joint space narrowing
3 Multiple osteophytes, definite joint space narrowing, sclerosis and possible bony deformity
4 Large osteophytes, marked joint space narrowing, severe sclerosis and definite bony deformity

Osteoarthritis of the hip joint may also be graded by Tönnis classification. There is no consensus whether it is more or less reliable than the Kellgren-Lawrence system.[8]

Severe (Tönnis grade 3) osteoarthritis of the hip.
Tönnis classification[9]
Grade Description
0 No osteoarthritis signs
1 Mild:
  • increased osteosclerosis
  • minor joint space narrowing (normal joint space is at least 2 mm at the superior acetabulum)[7]
  • no or minor loss of head sphericity
2 Moderate:
  • small bone cyst
  • moderate joint space narrowing
  • moderate loss of head sphericity
3 Severe:
  • large bone cysts
  • severe joint space narrowing, or joint space obliteration
  • severe deformity of the head

Knee

For the grading of osteoarthritis in the knee, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) system is regarded to have the most favorable combination of interobserver precision and correlation to knee arthroscopy findings.[10] It was formed by a group of knee surgeons from Europe and America who met in 1987 to develop a standard form to measure results of knee ligament reconstructions.[11]

The Ahlbäck system has been found to have comparable interobserver precision and arthroscopy correlation to the IKDC system, but most of the span of the Ahlbäck system focused at various degrees of bone defect or loss, and it is therefore less useful in early osteoarthritis.[10] Systems that have been found to have lower interobserver precision and/or arthroscopy correlation are those developed by Kellgren and Lawrence, Fairbank, Brandt, and Jäger and Wirth.[10]

International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) system[10]
Grade Findings
A No joint space narrowing, defined in this system as at least 4 mm joint space
B At least 4 mm joint space, but small osteophytes, slight sclerosis, or femoral condyle flattening
C 2–4 mm joint space
D < 2 mm joint space
Ahlbäck classification[12]
Grade Findings
I Joint space narrowing, with or without subchondral sclerosis. Joint space narrowing is defined by this system as a joint space less than 3 mm, or less than half of the space in the other compartment, or less than half of the space of the homologous compartment of the other knee.
II Obliteration of the joint space
III Bone defect/loss < 5 mm
IV Bone defect/loss between 5 and 10 mm
V Bone defect/loss > 10 mm, often with subluxation and arthritis of the other compartment

For the patellofemoral joint, a classification by Merchant 1974 uses a 45° "skyline" view of the patella:[13]

Merchant system
Stage Description
1 (mild) Patellofemoral joint space > 3 mm
2 (moderate) Joint space < 3 mm but no bony contact
3 (severe) Bony surfaces in contact over less than one quarter of the joint surface
4 (very severe) Bony contact throughout the entire joint surface

Other joints

Ankle osteoarthritis.
  • Talus - medial malleolus: 1.70 ± 0.13 mm
  • Talus - tibial plafond: 2.04 ± 0.29 mm
  • Talus - lateral malleolus: 2.13 ± 0.20 mm

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c d Kettler, Annette; Wilke, Hans-Joachim (2005). "Review of existing grading systems for cervical or lumbar disc and facet joint degeneration". European Spine Journal. 15 (6): 705–718. doi:10.1007/s00586-005-0954-y. ISSN 0940-6719. PMC 3489462. PMID 16172902.
  2. ^ Ofiram, Elisha; Garvey, Timothy A.; Schwender, James D.; Denis, Francis; Perra, Joseph H.; Transfeldt, Ensor E.; Winter, Robert B.; Wroblewski, Jill M. (2009). "Cervical degenerative index: a new quantitative radiographic scoring system for cervical spondylosis with interobserver and intraobserver reliability testing". Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology. 10 (1): 21–26. doi:10.1007/s10195-008-0041-3. ISSN 1590-9921. PMC 2657349. PMID 19384631.
  3. ^ Brox, Jens; Lereim, Paul; Merckoll, Else; Finnanger, Anne Marie (2009). "Radiographic classification of glenohumeral arthrosis". Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica. 74 (2): 186–189. doi:10.1080/00016470310013932. ISSN 0001-6470. PMID 12807327. S2CID 36730645.
  4. ^ Page 117 in Barbara N. W. Weissman (2009). Imaging of Arthritis and Metabolic Bone Disease. Elsevier Health Sciences. ISBN 9780323041775.
  5. ^ "Glenohumeral joint space". radref.org., in turn citing: Petersson, Claes J.; Redlund-Johnell, Inga (2009). "Joint Space in Normal Gleno-Humeral Radiographs". Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica. 54 (2): 274–276. doi:10.3109/17453678308996569. ISSN 0001-6470. PMID 6846006.
  6. ^ Zdravko Jotanovic, Radovan Mihelic, Gordan Gulan, Branko Sestan, Zlatko Dembic (2015). "Osteoarthritis of the hip: An overview". Periodicum Biologorum. 117 (1).((cite journal)): CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  7. ^ a b Lequesne, M (2004). "The normal hip joint space: variations in width, shape, and architecture on 223 pelvic radiographs". Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. 63 (9): 1145–1151. doi:10.1136/ard.2003.018424. ISSN 0003-4967. PMC 1755132. PMID 15308525.
  8. ^ Terjesen, Terje; Gunderson, Ragnhild B (2012). "Radiographic evaluation of osteoarthritis of the hip". Acta Orthopaedica. 83 (2): 185–189. doi:10.3109/17453674.2012.665331. ISSN 1745-3674. PMC 3339535. PMID 22329668.
  9. ^ "Tönnis Classification of Osteoarthritis by Radiographic Changes". Society of Preventive Hip Surgery. Retrieved 2016-12-13.
  10. ^ a b c d Wright, RW (2014). "Osteoarthritis Classification Scales: Interobserver Reliability and Arthroscopic Correlation". The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume. 96 (14): 1145–1151. doi:10.2106/JBJS.M.00929. ISSN 0021-9355. PMC 4083772. PMID 25031368.
  11. ^ Hefti F, Müller W, Jakob RP, Stäubli HU (1993). "Evaluation of knee ligament injuries with the IKDC form". Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1 (3–4): 226–34. doi:10.1007/bf01560215. PMID 8536037. S2CID 22344987.
  12. ^ Hernández-Vaquero, Daniel; Fernández-Carreira, José Manuel (2012). "Relationship between radiological grading and clinical status in knee osteoarthritis. a multicentric study". BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 13 (1): 194. doi:10.1186/1471-2474-13-194. ISSN 1471-2474. PMC 3520822. PMID 23046837.
  13. ^ Kim, Young-Mo; Joo, Yong-Bum (2012). "Patellofemoral Osteoarthritis". Knee Surgery & Related Research. 24 (4): 193–200. doi:10.5792/ksrr.2012.24.4.193. ISSN 2234-0726. PMC 3526755. PMID 23269956.
  14. ^ Page 722 in Gary S. Firestein, Ralph Budd, Sherine E Gabriel, Iain B. McInnes, James R O'Dell (2012). Kelley's Textbook of Rheumatology E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences. ISBN 9781455737673.((cite book)): CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  15. ^ Massilla Mani, F.; Sivasubramanian, S. Satha (2016). "A study of temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis using computed tomographic imaging". Biomedical Journal. 39 (3): 201–206. doi:10.1016/j.bj.2016.06.003. ISSN 2319-4170. PMC 6138784. PMID 27621122.
  16. ^ Nicolas Holzer, Davide Salvo, Anne Karien Marijnissen, Aminudin Che Ahmad, Emanuele Sera, Pierre Hoffmeyer, Anne Lübbeke Wolff, Mathieu Assal (2017-09-14). "How to assess ankle osteoarthritis: comparison of the Kellgren and Lawrence scale with functional outcome and digital image analysis". Orthopaedic Proceedings. 94-B.((cite journal)): CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  17. ^ Imai, Kan; Ikoma, Kazuya; Kido, Masamitsu; Maki, Masahiro; Fujiwara, Hiroyoshi; Arai, Yuji; Oda, Ryo; Tokunaga, Daisaku; Inoue, Nozomu; Kubo, Toshikazu (2015). "Joint space width of the tibiotalar joint in the healthy foot". Journal of Foot and Ankle Research. 8 (1): 26. doi:10.1186/s13047-015-0086-5. ISSN 1757-1146. PMC 4490633. PMID 26146520.
  18. ^ Quintana, José M.; Escobar, Antonio; Arostegui, Inmaculada; Bilbao, Amaia; Azkarate, Jesús; Goenaga, J. Ignacio; Arenaza, Juan C. (2006). "Health-Related Quality of Life and Appropriateness of Knee or Hip Joint Replacement". Archives of Internal Medicine. 166 (2): 220–6. doi:10.1001/archinte.166.2.220. ISSN 0003-9926. PMID 16432092.
Categories