The topic of this article may not meet Wikipedia's notability guideline for neologisms. Please help to demonstrate the notability of the topic by citing reliable secondary sources that are independent of the topic and provide significant coverage of it beyond a mere trivial mention. If notability cannot be shown, the article is likely to be merged, redirected, or deleted.Find sources: "Rhetrickery" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (June 2018) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)

Rhetrickery is a term defined by Wayne C. Booth to describe the “whole range of shoddy dishonest communicative arts producing misunderstanding — along with other harmful results. The arts of making the worst seem the better course.” (Booth, 2004, p 11). Booth views rhetrickery’s poisoning of both political and media cultures as being a key reason for the need for an increase in the teaching of rhetoric.[1][2][3][4]

References

  1. ^ Booth W. C.(2004) Rhetoric of Rhetoric: The Quest for Effective Communication (2004) Blackwell Manifesto
  2. ^ Jon Sung-Gi, (2011) Toward Wave Rhetorics for Scholarly Communications in Human Sciences. Advances in the History of Rhetoric 14:2, pages 207-219.
  3. ^ Stern, B. B. (2008). Rhetrickery and Rhetruth in Soap Operas: Genre Convention, Hidden Persuasions, and Vulnerable Audiences. Go Figure, 51-67.
  4. ^ Jacobi, M. (2005). From Rhetrickery to Rhetorology. South Carolina Review, 37(2), 240.