1933 constitutional crisis within the First Austrian Republic
President Miklas (center with bowler hat) and Chancellor Dollfuss (left from Miklas), 1932
The self-elimination of Parliament (German: Selbstausschaltung des Parlaments) was a constitutional crisis in the First Austrian Republic caused by the resignation on March 4, 1933, of all three presidents of the National Council, the more powerful house of the Austrian Parliament. The National Council was left without a presiding officer, when all three chairmen resigned to try to tip the balance in a knife-edge vote. The law had no mechanism for the National Council to operate without a president, and Engelbert Dollfuss, the Chancellor, stated that Parliament had eliminated itself and that his government had the authority to rule by decree under emergency provisions dating from the First World War. This was a decisive step in the transition from a democratic republic to the fascist Federal State of Austria, as opposition attempts to reconstitute the National Council were unsuccessful.[1][2]
Events of March 4, 1933
When railway workers learned that their salaries were going to be paid in three installments, they went on strike on Wednesday, March 1, 1933. This was the subject of the heated debate in the National Council on March 4, 1933. There were three proposals. The proposal from the Christian Social Party, which was the majority at the time, was to impose disciplinary measures. The Greater German People's Party (GDVP) and the Social Democratic Workers' Party of Austria (SDAPÖ) were both against disciplinary measures in their proposals.
The proposal of the Social Democrats had 70 yes votes and 92 no votes and was therefore rejected. The proposal of the GDVP, however, was accepted with 81 yes votes and 80 no votes. At 8:40 pm the session was interrupted and then continued at 9:35 pm. After the session was resumed, the president and Chairman of the National Council Karl Renner, who was a Social Democrat, announced that the vote had some irregularities because of the Members Wilhelm Scheibein [de] and Simon Abram [de], who were both Social Democrats. It turned out that Abram cast one ballot for himself and another ballot, which carried Abram's name, for Scheibein, who was not in the room at the time when the voting process occurred. This resulted in an uproar and the Christian Socials demanded a new vote. Karl Renner, who saw himself incapable of continuing the session, resigned as president of the National Council[3] to also be able to participate in next vote and therefore secure an additional vote for the Social Democrats.[4] The second president Rudolf Ramek, a Christian Social, took over as Chairman. He declared that the previous vote was invalid and demanded that the vote should be repeated. This resulted in another uproar. Ramek stepped down as president and the third president Sepp Straffner from the GDVP became Chairman of the National Council before immediately stepping down.[5] The resignation of Renner, Ramek and Straffner left the house without a president. Therefore, the session could not be closed and the National Council was incapable of acting.[6] The Members left the chamber as consequence.[5]
Dollfuss's interpretation
The events of March 4, 1933, were an unexpected help for Chancellor Engelbert Dollfuss, who intended to rule as an authoritarian. Dollfuss declared that the parliament had "eliminated itself" and that this situation was a crisis "not provided for in the constitution". This gave the Chancellor the opportunity to establish an authoritarian government without a parliament. What appeared to be a "self-elimination of parliament" was, in fact, a coup d'état, since Dollfuss was determined to ensure that the National Council would never come together again. On March 7, the federal government stated that it was not affected by the crisis and declared itself in power. It then announced that the "Wartime Economy Authority Law", an emergency law that was passed in 1917, would be used as a basis to rule.[6] The first section of this law reads as follows:
The government is empowered for the duration of the extraordinary conditions brought about by the war to make provision through decree for the necessary measures for promoting and revitalizing economic activities, for warding off economic damages, and supplying the population with food and other necessities.[7]
Events of March 15, 1933
On March 15, 1933, the Greater German People's Party (GDVP) and the Social Democratic Workers' Party of Austria (SDAPÖ) of Austria, which formed the opposition at that time, tried to continue the session that was aborted on March 4. They were, however, stopped by the Gendarmerie by order of the government and threatened the use of armed force.[8] The resigning and third president of the National Council of the GDVP, Sepp Straffner, canceled his own withdrawal and was sitting with Members of the National Council for the SDAP and GDVP in the parliamentary chamber. The other Members of the National Council were not allowed in the parliament, which was surrounded by the law enforcement. The Members who were already in the parliament were escorted out by the police.[9]
Role of Austrian President Wilhelm Miklas
Over a million people signed a petition to ask then sitting Austrian PresidentWilhelm Miklas to recall the government of Dollfuss and initiate new elections to reinstate the National Council. The constitution gave Miklas the power to do so. However, the president did not act, which allowed Dollfuss to continue ruling without parliament.[10][11]
To ensure that the parliament would never "eliminate itself" again, a new law was introduced in 1975 that would give the position of Chairman to the oldest Member of the National Council, if the three presidents were not able to execute their duties as Chairmen.[citation needed]
^Rohsmann, Katarina (2011). Politische Verfolgung im Austrofaschismus: Polizeimaßnahmen − Tendenzjustiz − Anhaltehaft. Johannes Kepler Universität Linz. p. 18.
