You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:

This IP address has been blocked from editing Wikipedia.
This does not affect your ability to read Wikipedia pages.
Most people who see this message have done nothing wrong. Some kinds of blocks restrict editing from specific service providers or telecom companies in response to recent abuse or vandalism, and can sometimes affect other users who are unrelated to that abuse. Review the information below for assistance if you do not believe that you have done anything wrong.

The IP address or range 44.203.0.0/16 has been blocked (disabled) by ‪ST47‬ for the following reason(s):

The IP address that you are currently using has been blocked because it is believed to be a web host provider. To prevent abuse, web hosts may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
You will not be able to edit Wikipedia using a web host provider because it hides your IP address, much like a proxy or VPN.
We recommend that you attempt to use another connection to edit. For example, if you use a proxy or VPN to connect to the internet, turn it off when editing Wikipedia. If you edit using a mobile connection, try using a Wi-Fi connection, and vice versa. If you are using a corporate internet connection, switch to a different Wi-Fi network. If you have a Wikipedia account, please log in.
If you do not have any other way to edit Wikipedia, you will need to request an IP block exemption.

How to appeal if you are confident that your connection does not use a web host's IP address:
If you are confident that you are not using a web host, you may appeal this block by adding the following text on your talk page: ((unblock|reason=Caught by a web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is _______. Place any further information here. ~~~~)). You must fill in the blank with your IP address for this block to be investigated. Your IP address can be determined here. Alternatively, if you wish to keep your IP address private you can use the unblock ticket request system. There are several reasons you might be editing using the IP address of a web host (such as if you are using VPN software or a business network); please use this method of appeal only if you think your IP address is in fact not a web host.

Administrators: The IP block exemption user right should only be applied to allow users to edit using web host in exceptional circumstances, and they should usually be directed to the functionaries team via email. If you intend to give the IPBE user right, a CheckUser needs to take a look at the account. This can be requested most easily at SPI Quick Checkuser Requests. Unblocking an IP or IP range with this template is highly discouraged without at least contacting the blocking administrator.

This block will expire on 23:54, 31 July 2024.

Even when blocked, you will usually still be able to edit your user talk page, as well as email administrators and other editors.

For information on how to proceed, please read the FAQ for blocked users and the guideline on block appeals. The guide to appealing blocks may also be helpful.

Other useful links: Blocking policy · Help:I have been blocked
Your IP address is in a range that has been blocked on all Wikimedia Foundation wikis. The block was made by ‪AntiCompositeNumber‬. The reason given is Open proxy/Webhost: Visit the FAQ if you are affected .
- Start of block: 13:55, 18 August 2022
- Expiry of block: 13:55, 18 July 2025
Your current IP address is 44.203.232.145. The blocked range is 44.203.0.0/16. Please include all above details in any queries you make. If you believe you were blocked by mistake, you can find additional information and instructions in the No open proxies global policy. Otherwise, to discuss the block please post a request for review on Meta-Wiki. You could also send an email to the stewards VRT queue at stewards@wikimedia.org including all above details.

You can view and copy the source of this page:

((Short description|Practice in primary and secondary education))
((Multiple issues|
((Globalize|article|North America|date=April 2013))
((more citations needed|date=January 2013))
((copy edit|date=June 2023))
))

'''Social promotion''' is the [[education]]al practice of promoting a [[student]] (usually a general education student, rather than a [[special education]] student) to the next [[Educational stage|grade]] at the end of a school year, regardless of whether they learned the necessary material or if they were often absent. This is done to keep the students with their peers by age, the intended social grouping. It is sometimes referred to as promotion based on '''seat time''', or the time the child spends sitting in school. This is based on the enrollment criteria for [[kindergarten]], which is being 4 or 5 years old (5 or 6 years old for 1st graders) at the beginning of the school year. The intention is for the students to be able to graduate from [[high school]]-level education before their 19th birthday.

Advocates of social promotion argue that promotion is done in order not to harm the students' or their classmates' [[self-esteem]], to encourage socialization by age (together with their [[Cohort (statistics)|age cohort]]), to facilitate student involvement in [[Youth sports|sports teams]], or to promote a student who is weak in one subject based on strength in the other areas.

In [[Education in Canada|Canada]] and the [[Education in the United States|United States]], social promotion is normally limited to [[primary education]], because comprehensive [[secondary education]] is more flexible about determining which level of students take which classes due to the graduation requirements, which makes the concept of social promotion much less meaningful. For example, a student can study with his age cohort in social studies but with younger students in math class (based on his math level assessment, [[Summative assessment|summative]] or [[Formative assessment|formative]]).
 
In some countries, [[grade retention]] is allowed when students have not learned the necessary material or are often absent.

The opposite of social promotion would be to promote students once they learned the necessary material. This might be called "merit promotion", similar to the concept of a "merit civil service". The scope of the promotion might then be either to the next grade or to the next course in the same field. In a curriculum based on grades, this is usually called "mid-term promotion". In a curriculum based on courses rather than grades, the promotion is open-ended and is better understood as satisfying a prerequisite for the next course.

==Pros==
Supporters of social promotion policies do not defend social promotion so much as say that [[grade retention|retention]] is even worse. They argue that retention is not a cost-effective response to poor performance compared to cheaper or more effective interventions, such as additional tutoring and summer school. They point to a wide range of research findings that show no advantage to, or even harm from, retention and the tendency for gains from retention to wash out.

Harm from grade retention cited by these critics include:
* Increased [[Dropping out|dropout]] rates of repeaters over time
* This may be proven true by data from studies by Allenseorth (2005), and the data recorded by Frey (2005) where dropout rates in Minnesota schools for repeaters nearly doubled from non-repeaters at 12.4% and to retained student drop out rates jumping to 27.2%
* No evidence of long-term academic benefit for retained students
* Increased rates of [[mental disorders]] and dangerous behaviors such as drinking, drug use, crime, teenage pregnancy, [[Major depressive disorder|depression]], and [[suicide]] among repeaters as compared with similarly performing promoted students.
* Feeling left out with kids from different age groups, which means that being too old may lead to bullying, having fewer friends, and being ridiculed.

Critics of retention also note that retention has hard financial costs for school systems: requiring a student to repeat a grade is essentially to add one student for a year to the school system, assuming that the student does not drop out. Some parents worry that older retained students will victimize younger students.

==Cons==
Opponents of social promotion argue that it cheats children of education. When socially promoted children reach higher levels of education, they may be unprepared, fail courses, and not make normal progress towards graduation.

Opponents of social promotion argue that it has the following negative impacts:
* Students who have to wait for the end of the school year to move on to more advanced studies are denied present success.
* Students promoted to a class for which they are known to be unable to do the work are positioned for further failure.
* Students can have so many easy successes during subsequent years that either their study skills deteriorate or they become so frustrated with banal lessons that they drop out.
* Students can have many failures during the subsequent years, which frustrates them and may increase the risk of dropping out.
* Their frustration at sitting through "baby classes" can lead to classroom disruptions or the humiliation of others.
* Their frustration can lead to classroom disruptions, which can diminish the achievement of others.
* It sends the message to all students that they can get by without working hard.
* It forces the next teacher to deal with already-prepared and under-prepared students while trying to teach the prepared
* It gives parents and students a false sense of their children's progress.
* It creates social fiefdoms of same-age peers and their consequent peer pressure causing bullying and drug abuse.

Some hold that most students at the elementary school level do not take their education seriously and, therefore, retention is most likely not to be effective. Since most middle school students value their education more ((Citation needed|date=December 2010)), retention should be used if they are judged not to have adequate skills before entering high school.

It can also be argued that social promotion, by keeping most students at the elementary school level from advancing at their own pace, is why they do not take their education seriously. Eliminating the social promotion system would then make the incentives of merit promotion more effective at the beginning of each student's academic career.

== Statistics ==
In the United States,  retention is more common for boys and non-white students than for girls and white students. By the time students reach high school, the retention rate for boys is about ten percentage points higher than for girls. In the early grades, retention rates are similar among [[white Americans]], [[African Americans]], and [[Hispanics in the United States|Hispanic Americans]]. By high school, the rate is about 15 percentage points higher for African Americans and Hispanics than for whites.<ref>((cite book |last1=McCombs |first1=Jennifer Sloan |last2=Kirby |first2=Sheila Nataraj |last3=Mariano |first3=Louis T. |last4=Xia |first4=Nailing |title=Ending Social Promotion Without Leaving Children Behind: The Case of New York City|location=Santa Monica, California |date=2009 |publisher=RAND Corporation |isbn=9780833047786 |page=16 |url=https://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG894.html |accessdate=8 February 2020 |language=en))</ref> ((full citation needed|date=April 2012)) Across all grades, black students are three times more likely to be grade-retained than are white students; Hispanics are twice as likely.<ref>((Cite news |last=Adams |first=Caralee J. |date=2012-03-06 |title=Civil Rights Data Show Retention Disparities |language=en |work=Education Week |url=https://www.edweek.org/leadership/civil-rights-data-show-retention-disparities/2012/03 |access-date=2022-09-16 |issn=0277-4232))</ref><ref>((Cite news |last=Cook |first=Lindsey |date=2015-01-28 |title=U.S. Education: Still Separate and Unequal |work=U.S. News |url=https://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/data-mine/2015/01/28/us-education-still-separate-and-unequal |url-status=live |access-date=2022-09-16 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220720070234/https://www.usnews.com/news/blogs/data-mine/2015/01/28/us-education-still-separate-and-unequal|archive-date=2022-07-20 ))</ref>

There are arguments for and against both social promotion and retention. When students are socially promoted, they may be disadvantaged by not having learned material. However, retained students are older than their peers in the classroom, which can cause social problems. African American boys are the group that is most often retained in school. By the time the students reach the ages of 15–17, 50% of African American boys are either below the grade of their peers or have dropped out of school. In contrast, only 30% of white girls ages 15–17 are below the modal grade of their peers.<ref>Hauser, Robert M. Should We End Social Promotion? Truth and Consequences. N.p.: n.p., n.d. Center for Demography and Ecology The University of Wisconsin-Madison. Web. 20 May 2017.</ref>

In 1999, educational researcher [http://www.ssc.wisc.edu/~hauser/ Robert Hauser] said of the New York City school district:  "In its plan to end social promotion, the administration appears to have [included] ... an enforcement provision—flunking kids by the carload lot—about which the great mass of evidence is strongly negative.  And this policy will hurt poor and minority children most of all." [Glavin, C. (2014, February 5). Studies. Retrieved from http://www.k12academics.com/education-issues/social-promotion/studies#.WSBLyLwrK8o]

In a study of 99,000 Florida students, Jay P. Greene and Marcus A. Winters [http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/edfp.2007.2.4.319] found that "retained students slightly outperformed socially promoted students in reading in the first year after retention, and these gains increased substantially in the second year. Results were robust across two distinct IV comparisons: an across-year approach comparing students who were essentially separated by the year they happened to have been born, and a regression discontinuity design." ["Revisiting Grade Retention: An evaluation of Florida's test-based Promotion Policy in Education and Finance Policy, MIT Press, 2006]

== History ==
With the proliferation of graded schools in the middle of the 19th century, retention, as were mid-term promotions, became a common practice.  In fact, a century ago, approximately half of all American students were retained at least once before the age of 13.<ref name=Rose>Rose, Janet S.;  et al.  "A Fresh Look at the Retention-Promotion Controversy."  Journal of School Psychology, v21 n3 p201-11 Fall 1983. [http://www.eric.ed.gov:80/ERICWebPortal/custom/portlets/recordDetails/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=EJ292730&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=EJ292730]</ref>

Social promotion began to spread in the 1930s along with concerns about the psychosocial effects of retention.<ref name=Rose />  This trend reversed in the 1980s, as concern about slipping academic standards rose.

The practice of grade retention in the U.S. has been climbing steadily since the 1980s,<ref>Leckrone, M. J. & B. G. Griffith. (2006) “Retention realities and educational standards.” In ''Children & Schools'' 28(1) p53-58  See article at http://www.redorbit.com/news/education/357610/retention_realities_and_educational_standards/</ref> although local educational agencies may or may not follow this trend.  For example, in 1982, [[New York City]] schools stopped social promotions. Within a few years, the problems caused by the change in policy led the city to start social promotion again. In 1999, the city once again eliminated social promotion; it reinstated it after the number of repeaters had mounted to 100,000 by 2004, driving up costs and leading to cutbacks in numerous programs, including those for helping underachievers.((Citation needed|date=February 2020))

==Alternatives==
Apart from the social promotion, there is the [[grade retention]], in which students repeat a grade when judged to be a low performer. Grade retention aims to help the student learn and sharpen skills such as organization, management, [[study skills]], literacy and academic which are very important before entering the next grade, [[Higher education|college]] and the [[labor force]].

In the US simple social promotion was not considered an adequate alternative to the grade retention.  Current theories among academic scholars prefer to address underperformance problems with remedial help. Students with singular needs or disabilities require special teaching approaches, equipment, or care within or outside a regular classroom. Since students with intellectual disabilities are handled separately, schools may treat two students with identical achievements differently if one of the students is low-performing, but typically developing and the other student is low-performing due to a disability.

Apart from social promotion, there is merit promotion, either by mid-term promotion or by using a course-based curriculum with a [[directed acyclic graph]] of prerequisites similar to college curricula. This alternative is unique in allowing each student to advance at his or her own pace. It would also save school districts money by ending the practice of warehousing "talented and gifted students" and allowing those students to graduate early.

==See also==
* [[Grade retention]]
* [[Grade skipping]]

==References==
((reflist))

== Further reading ==
* Allensworth, E. M. (2005). Dropout rates after high-stakes testing in elementary school: A study of the contradictory effects of Chicago's efforts to end social promotion. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 27(4), 341–364.
* Frey, N. (2005). Retention, social promotion, and academic redshirting: What do we know and need to know? Remedial and Special Education, 26(6), 332–346.
* Glavin, C. (2014, February 5). Studies. Retrieved from http://www.k12academics.com/education-issues/social-promotion/studies#.WSBLyLwrK8o
* "Schools Repeat Social Promotion Problems", Sheryl McCarthy, ''Newsday'', March 28, 2002.
* "What If We Ended Social Promotion?", ''Education Week'', April 7, 1999, pp 64–66.
* ''Hard Facts, Dangerous Half-Truths, and Total Nonsense: Profiting from Evidence-Based Management'', [[Jeffrey Pfeffer]] and [[Robert I. Sutton]], 2006

<!--<nowiki>
  See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Footnotes for an explanation of how
  to generate footnotes using the <ref> and </ref> tags
</nowiki>-->

[[Category:Education issues]]
[[Category:Education in the United States]]
[[Category:Education in Canada]]
[[Category:Education reform]]
[[Category:Standards-based education]]
[[Category:Ethically disputed educational practices]]

Pages transcluded onto the current version of this page (help):

Social promotion (edit)
Template:Ambox (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Category handler (view source) (protected)
Template:Citation needed (view source) (protected)
Template:Cite book (view source) (protected)
Template:Cite news (view source) (protected)
Template:Copy edit (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Delink (view source) (protected)
Template:Find sources mainspace (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Fix (view source) (protected)
Template:Fix/category (view source) (protected)
Template:Full citation needed (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Globalize (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Globalize/name (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Main other (view source) (protected)
Template:More citations needed (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Multiple issues (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Multiple issues/styles.css (view source) (template editor protected)
Template:Pagetype (view source) (protected)
Template:Reflist (view source) (protected)
Template:Reflist/styles.css (view source) (protected)
Template:SDcat (view source) (protected)
Template:Short description (view source) (protected)
Template:Short description/lowercasecheck (view source) (protected)
Module:Arguments (view source) (protected)
Module:Category handler (view source) (protected)
Module:Category handler/blacklist (view source) (protected)
Module:Category handler/config (view source) (protected)
Module:Category handler/data (view source) (protected)
Module:Category handler/shared (view source) (protected)
Module:Check for unknown parameters (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1 (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1/COinS (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1/Date validation (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1/Utilities (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1/Whitelist (view source) (protected)
Module:Citation/CS1/styles.css (view source) (protected)
Module:Delink (view source) (protected)
Module:Disambiguation/templates (view source) (protected)
Module:Find sources (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Find sources/config (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Find sources/links (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Find sources/templates/Find sources mainspace (view source) (template editor protected)
Module:Message box (view source) (protected)
Module:Message box/ambox.css (view source) (protected)
Module:Message box/configuration (view source) (protected)
Module:Namespace detect/config (view source) (protected)
Module:Namespace detect/data (view source) (protected)
Module:Pagetype (view source) (protected)
Module:Pagetype/config (view source) (protected)
Module:Pagetype/disambiguation (view source) (protected)
Module:Pagetype/setindex (view source) (protected)
Module:Pagetype/softredirect (view source) (protected)
Module:SDcat (view source) (protected)
Module:String (view source) (protected)
Module:Unsubst (view source) (protected)
Module:Wikitext Parsing (view source) (protected)
Module:Yesno (view source) (protected)

Return to Social promotion.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_promotion"