02:3202:32, 31 March 2022diffhist−4
DAM (band)
Reverting the tendentious, petty, politically-motivated change by an Israeli editor that altered their description to refer to them as an "Israeli" hip-hop group. The members of DAM self-identify as Palestinian: it's one thing to refer to their city of origin as being in Israel, but it's another to deny their self-identified nationality, especially when Palestinian nationalism is such a prominent theme in their music
17:2917:29, 29 August 2021diffhist+22
Kata'ib Sayyid al-Shuhada
Changed what had been an overly-literal English translation of the name of the group: "Sayyed al-Shuhada'" is an informal title of Imam Hussain ibn 'Ali, third imam of Shi'i Islam, and it is this meaning of the phrase to which the name of the group refers, a meaning usually translated into English as "Master of Martyrs"
02:1802:18, 24 August 2020diffhist−2 m
Ibn Qulawayh
changed "traditionalist" to "traditionist" again, as above, and changed the tense to reflect that he is a historical figure not a living person
02:1702:17, 24 August 2020diffhist−2 m
Ibn Qulawayh
Changed "traditionalist" in the lead to "traditionist", as the latter is clearly what was meant here. "Traditionist" means someone concerned with ahadith, while "traditionalist" means an adherent to traditions (as in cultural practices, not traditions as in narrations)
09:2109:21, 25 July 2020diffhist−2 m
Abu Turab al-Zahiri
Changed "his roots weren't Arabic" to "his roots weren't Arab", as the latter is the correct adjective describing someone of Arab ethnicity, while "Arabic" refers only to the Arabic language
18 December 2017
08:0608:06, 18 December 2017diffhist0 m
Pakistan Muslim League
Corrected typo in infobox ("pro-presidnecy" -> "pro-presidency")
18:5218:52, 17 June 2015diffhist−1
Template:Aqidah
Changed "Nusairis" to "Alawites", as the former is generally considered derogatory; changed "Druzes" to "Druze" which is the proper plural form in English
06:1506:15, 13 August 2014diffhist+690
Pogrom
Undid revision 621017301 by Altenmann (talk) I did read your objection. Your argument isn't relevant to the question of whether or not he said it, which is a fact borne out by the cited material.