8 February 2024
- 00:3100:31, 8 February 2024 diff hist −427 Moloch don't think long quotes are appropriate here - we used to have whole sections of them current Tag: Undo
7 February 2024
- 14:1514:15, 7 February 2024 diff hist +385 User talk:Ermenrich →Huns: Reply Tag: Reply
- 01:4201:42, 7 February 2024 diff hist +104 Talk:Proto-Germanic language →Diphthong iu: Reply current Tag: Reply
6 February 2024
- 21:2921:29, 6 February 2024 diff hist −910 Talk:The Exodus this is WP:NOTAFORUM - if you wish to show the Exodus is true with links to websites, there are plenty of other websites online where you can do so current Tag: Undo
3 February 2024
- 19:1819:18, 3 February 2024 diff hist −7 Afroasiatic languages not an improvement - extinct languages can still be "spoken" current Tag: Undo
- 01:2001:20, 3 February 2024 diff hist −230 Moloch notability has to be shown be citations to the works of others Tag: Undo
2 February 2024
- 22:5422:54, 2 February 2024 diff hist +136 Talk:Herod the Great →Secular viewpoint: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit Reply
- 21:0321:03, 2 February 2024 diff hist +343 Talk:Herod the Great →Secular viewpoint: Reply Tag: Reply
- 21:0021:00, 2 February 2024 diff hist −21 Gothic language not an improvement - the prayer is not called "Our Father" in English that I've heard and there could always potentially be more examples added current Tag: Undo
- 17:0217:02, 2 February 2024 diff hist −944 Talk:Germanic peoples →Question: this is WP:NOTAFORUM - there are plenty of other places online to complain about the hypocrisy of scholars Tag: Manual revert
- 13:2513:25, 2 February 2024 diff hist +161 Talk:Germanic peoples →Question: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit Reply
1 February 2024
31 January 2024
- 22:4522:45, 31 January 2024 diff hist +188 Talk:Proto-Germanic language →Diphthong iu: Reply Tag: Reply
- 18:3718:37, 31 January 2024 diff hist −348 Talk:Wolfdietrich WP:DENY current Tag: Undo
- 15:0915:09, 31 January 2024 diff hist +703 Talk:Proto-Germanic language →Diphthong iu: new section Tag: New topic
- 15:0215:02, 31 January 2024 diff hist +6 Proto-Germanic language →Diphthongs: I realize most of this article is missing citations, but I can't find any mention of a PGmc diphthong iu in the reference books I've looked at
30 January 2024
- 13:1413:14, 30 January 2024 diff hist +42 Moloch Undid revision 1200746769 by 2603:8000:CD02:F23D:7566:A453:F23F:CC6C (talk) Tags: Undo Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
29 January 2024
- 22:5022:50, 29 January 2024 diff hist −7 Book of Exodus Undid revision 1200617495 by 92.23.190.149 (talk) Tags: Undo Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 15:4415:44, 29 January 2024 diff hist +1,013 Religion in Russia there has not been consensus to change these numbers Tag: Manual revert
- 02:5902:59, 29 January 2024 diff hist −397 Tophet This edit does not make sense - the article about Carthaginian child sacrifice so obviously it was performed by carthaginians if it happened, but what’s “only” mean? Tags: Manual revert Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 01:5801:58, 29 January 2024 diff hist −3,168 Moloch I don't think this belongs in this article - archaeological evidence is already covered above and is closely connected to the question of what Moloch means Tags: Undo Reverted
27 January 2024
- 00:0800:08, 27 January 2024 diff hist −230 Moloch Not notable - sourced to itself Tags: Manual revert Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
26 January 2024
- 22:4322:43, 26 January 2024 diff hist −36 Attila those are legendary figures only mentioned almost a thousand years after Attila died Tags: Undo Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 02:1302:13, 26 January 2024 diff hist −8 Herod the Great he says “most” - see WP:RS/AC Tags: Undo Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
25 January 2024
- 22:3822:38, 25 January 2024 diff hist +463 Talk:Ahnenerbe →Hitler's Books are Unrelieble Source for His Views(!): Reply Tag: Reply
- 22:3622:36, 25 January 2024 diff hist +125 Ahnenerbe not everything in the lead of an article is cited, that's what the body is for. See WP:LEADCITE Tag: Undo
- 22:2422:24, 25 January 2024 diff hist −1,250 Ahnenerbe see WP:PRIMARY and WP:SECONDARY Tags: Undo Reverted
- 16:2316:23, 25 January 2024 diff hist +136 Talk:Gonzalo Lira →You will add self mentioned account: Reply Tag: Reply
- 15:3115:31, 25 January 2024 diff hist +746 Talk:Gonzalo Lira →Removal of reliable sources per WP:CITEKILL: Reply Tag: Reply
24 January 2024
- 16:3716:37, 24 January 2024 diff hist +223 Talk:Gonzalo Lira →Novels: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit Reply
- 15:4815:48, 24 January 2024 diff hist +2 m Talk:Gonzalo Lira →Novels: minor CE of my comment
- 14:5914:59, 24 January 2024 diff hist +247 Talk:Gonzalo Lira →Novels: Reply Tag: Reply
- 14:5714:57, 24 January 2024 diff hist +525 Talk:Gonzalo Lira →Novels: new section Tag: New topic
- 13:4313:43, 24 January 2024 diff hist +426 Talk:Gonzalo Lira →SF Examiner: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit Reply
- 13:4013:40, 24 January 2024 diff hist +231 Talk:Gonzalo Lira →Blogging: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit Reply
- 00:5200:52, 24 January 2024 diff hist −6,723 Book of Exodus →Historicity: remove recent additions that mostly seem to be pushing the fringe maximalist position - the place to discuss the historical exodus in detail is The Exodus as well as Sources and parallels of the Exodus
23 January 2024
- 21:0021:00, 23 January 2024 diff hist −348 Gonzalo Lira the information is already sourced to another source - there is no reason to include a pro-Putinist newspaper, even if it is well-known Tag: Undo
- 15:2615:26, 23 January 2024 diff hist +417 Talk:Book of Exodus →Konrad Schmid edit: Reply Tag: Reply
- 01:1801:18, 23 January 2024 diff hist −243 Gonzalo Lira →Career: remove WP:PRIMARY which were being used to support this text for some reason
- 01:1701:17, 23 January 2024 diff hist −360 Gonzalo Lira →Career: this is definitely not a reliable source
- 01:0201:02, 23 January 2024 diff hist −348 Gonzalo Lira First class source? "Its reporting on the war has been seen as so pro-Russia and pro-Vladimir Putin that the Russian embassy has praised and retweeted it." Tag: Undo
22 January 2024
- 16:0416:04, 22 January 2024 diff hist +11 Gonzalo Lira believe this hasn't been officially confirmed
- 03:1303:13, 22 January 2024 diff hist +4 Afroasiatic languages Russian doesn’t stop being Russian if written in the Latin alphabet, and it’s obviously preferable to write in a way that our readers who don’t read Cyrillic can read Tags: Undo Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 01:3201:32, 22 January 2024 diff hist +14 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gonzalo Lira (5th nomination) missed strikes
- 01:3001:30, 22 January 2024 diff hist +1,032 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gonzalo Lira (5th nomination) striking comments that violate WP:GS/RUSUKR for being by non-autoconfirmed users
- 01:2301:23, 22 January 2024 diff hist +1 m Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gonzalo Lira (5th nomination) m
- 01:2201:22, 22 January 2024 diff hist +1,080 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gonzalo Lira (5th nomination) →Gonzalo Lira: comment
21 January 2024
- 22:5622:56, 21 January 2024 diff hist +622 Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Gonzalo Lira (5th nomination) self revert - looks like they’re allowed to post here actually. If I’m wrong feel free to revert Tags: Undo Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 22:5422:54, 21 January 2024 diff hist 0 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gonzalo Lira (5th nomination) →Gonzalo Lira: Is someone deliberately moving the SPA tags to different comments? Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 21:5621:56, 21 January 2024 diff hist −622 Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Gonzalo Lira (5th nomination) IP comments appear to be attempts to get around the editing restrictions imposed by WP:GS/RUSUKR Tags: Blanking Reverted
