14:4914:49, 10 October 2008diffhist−24
Antinous
I like the first one better because it flows better. And love is more open than beloved and lover because it includes both possibilities and more general.
14:2214:22, 10 October 2008diffhist−7
Antinous
I see what you mean. How about this? "lover" or "beloved" changed to "loved" and making things more balanced by the fact that he was a member of an entourage
13:3213:32, 10 October 2008diffhist−6
Antinous
this is your own view and you can't impose it on the readers of wikipedia. that's just not fair or allowable. look at books and websites on the two people and you'll see by far most call them "lovers"
20:4420:44, 8 October 2008diffhist−280
Antinous
Not sure what you mean by your last statement. But such a broad claim as introduced by the text in question must have supporting references.
13:1713:17, 7 October 2008diffhist−300
Antinous
please do not undo blindly. First there is a mispelling of his name. 2nd the story & the part that says it believed to follow a peder trad have no sources. Sounds like OR to me especially how it ends.