This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Microsoft Windows: Computing Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft Windows, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microsoft Windows on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Microsoft WindowsWikipedia:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsTemplate:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsMicrosoft Windows articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Computing. Software: Computing Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

I know OmniWeb for OS X also offers thumbnails of pages loaded in tabs. Can anyone determine which used it first?

This article reads like it was written from someone from AOL. I've reworded a few passages to make it sound more npov, and rewrote the title of "praise" to "Critical reception". But that section only contains positive responses. There are no negative ones. The lack of sources is also a problem.--w^{L<speak·check>} 22:24, 10 June 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Looks like someone changed it back, anyways that section it out of date anyways. Opera is free, and IE7 is completely different.60.226.188.140 13:16, 11 June 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I think I've cleaned up the Reception section and removed the obvious POV. If anyone objects, feel free to add the tag back and discuss any possible improvements here. --Android Mouse 04:02, 24 June 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It's such an excellent and flawless browser that I couldn't imagine how any praise towards it could be biased. 71.222.85.159 (talk) 09:17, 28 June 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Am I mistaken, or is AOL no longer distributing this program? The link to the download page goes to something about downloading IE8 and aol toolbar stuff. ^[1] 70.247.168.40 (talk) 18:24, 28 May 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It certainly looks like they're still distributing it - the download page seems to have been moved to http://misc-apache.aol.co.uk/template/ukaoldesktop/.75.69.244.66 (talk) 15:08, 27 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Now there is AOL Explorer Gold at https://help.aol.com/ saying how to have AOL help with reduced employee help because of COVID-19.--Dthomsen8 (talk) 18:44, 5 April 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]