This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Aviation This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

I'm confused as to why "The Mall" link text links to DC... isn't that the wrong way 'round? Or at any rate, it'd be a good idea to make it more transparent why the given text links to the given article... Alai 05:12, 29 August 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Is there really SUA over Manhattan and Hollywood? I don't have the relevant charts but I checked online and couldn't see any. There may be TFRs popping up in those places, but a TFR isn't a SUA. Other well-known examples of P are Crawford and Kennebunkport. There are plenty of R's and MOAs around well-known installations, particularly military - can't we use those as an example? David Brooks 05:28, 29 August 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I corrected the SUA definition but qualified my description as being just for the US - can someone who knows other jurisdictions can retouch as appropriate. The AIM also recognizes "Other Airspace Areas" - if we go an and talk about those, it needs to be made more clear that all SUA and OAA is also either Controlled or Uncontrolled. David Brooks 15:32, 22 March 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I think that the big problem was that there are really only two top level types of airspace: controlled or uncontrolled. Prohibited Areas, Restricted Areas and all manner of other SUA is a different concept to this. I've changed the article to reflect this, removing the definition of SUA (which is almost and article in its own right) and removed some assertions based on the US way of doing things that are incorrect from an international perspective.BaseTurnComplete 14:57, 30 May 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Does anyone know the vertical limit of airspace? I.e how high do satellites need to be to avoid a violation of airspace?

Good question. I think the Karman line is what everyone just "goes with" and nobody makes a fuss about it, but there's no international agreement I can find. Could make things interesting in the future. FireLordAang (talk) 05:13, 1 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Added a diagram to the main page of some special designations of airspace and removed tag.

The image is somewhat unclear. It would be helpful to add a caption explaining what each class is.--160.39.206.248 (talk) 19:56, 15 June 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi,

I added important information about the different airspace. My source is the FAA, in other words U.S. regulations. Although most countries use the same airspace rules and types I find it necessary to, somehow, disambiguate the topic stating something like: "the following airspace designation and rules are from the U.S. However, most countries have adapted this nomenclature making it somewhat universal".

Denis17.ranque (talk) 13:46, 9 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Airspace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130207075314/http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/ATpubs/AIM/aim0301.html to http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/ATpubs/AIM/aim0301.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:58, 22 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]