Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Brachy0008 (talk · contribs) 06:10, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Cornmazes I added some comments. Brachy08 _(Talk) 01:00, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Apologies, but what does “FN” mean? Additionally, how can the COPYVIO situation be remedied? Cornmazes (talk) 01:26, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would not mind the COPYVIO situation, as it is a quotation. FN is short for quotation Brachy08 _(Talk) 01:31, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again! Sorry for all these questions, this is my first attempt at one of these. What can I do to fix this issue? Cornmazes (talk) 02:51, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can try finding better sources. Brachy08 _(Talk) 02:52, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I mean, sources are the hardest of them all, so it’s understandable. Brachy08 _(Talk) 02:52, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay! This refers to the first ten citations, correct? Just want to double-check before I go off reference hunting. Cornmazes (talk) 04:08, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

yes. Brachy08 _(Talk) 04:08, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Another Believer would you mind assisting me a bit when you have the chance, please? I want to let Brachy breathe, lol Cornmazes (talk) 04:11, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(finally, someone does not add an extra n) Brachy08 _(Talk) 04:12, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings Wikipedian, my name is Brachy0008 from the planet Glametron. What's yours? Now, I've come along way to be here tonight so lets get our greetings and salutations out of the way right now, shall We? Hieeee! Oh, I don't know about you Miss Cornmazes but I feel so much yummier. Now, there is this Good Article review has recently come to my intention. That we need to discuss right now, is that okay with you, honey?

@Brachy0008: Iconic! Best GA review start ever! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 15:06, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is so iconic! Should the citations in the lead be placed somewhere else, or simply removed? Cornmazes (talk) 19:12, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Placed somewhere else. Brachy08 _(Talk) 00:33, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done :) Cornmazes (talk) 20:50, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Brachy08 _(Talk) 00:33, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Overalls[edit]

By the looks of it, it would be an insta-fail for me. However, I’ll let you improve it, I’ll be there churning up suggestions to improve, because I am nice (and red for filth [pun])

Manual of Style[edit]

Lead[edit]

• There are citations in the lead. No citations in the lead.

Copyvios[edit]

• Checked with Earwig’s. And the copyvio situation might be terrible (47.1%) (from quotation)

Sources[edit]

Reliability[edit]

• FNs 1 to 10 are not found in the RSP list.
  • FN 8 is Twitter, but I’ll let that pass. If you are keen of making this a featured article after this review, find a better source.
• It’s been like, fourteen days, since I last commented lol. I have a concern for FN 12 (A YouTube source), but it’s not really that disruptive for it being a GA.
• FN 13-15 is not found in the RSP list.
  • FN 15 is a dead link
• Because of the lack of luck on using, WP:RSP, I’d rather churn out the sources on a table.

And these are the only sources among 34 sources I could analyse. I’m hoping for an improvement in sourcing if it deserves a GA.

Inline?[edit]

• I can’t access FN 14. Can you tell me what it is?
• I’m unable to access some of the sites, so the review for inline citations would be a bit limited, so table time.

Comments by other editors[edit]

• No one replied here, but the WOWIE Awards should be removed (really, across all biographies on Wikipedia). The WOWIE Awards are not independently notable and they are presented by the production company behind Drag Race. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 17:52, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Update: This has been resolved. Thanks! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 19:31, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    There doesn't seem to be movement here. Has this effort been abandoned? ---Another Believer _(Talk) 14:05, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Not really. I just have other stuff on mind or are you referring to the nominator? Brachy08 _(Talk) 22:52, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Brachy0008, "Once you start a review, you are committing to complete it in a timely manner", normally around a week. This nomination has been on hold for 45 days. If you do not think the article meets the GA criteria, please fail the nomination; if you do, please pass the nomination. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 22:08, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    sorry about this. i will try to pass or fail this as soon as possible. Brachy08 _(Talk) 23:32, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose. A total of 30 sources are WP:GUNREL. WP:SELFPUB says against GA. --Twinkle1990 (talk) 15:51, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Twinkle1990, your !vote has no meaning here. Brachy0008, do your job as a reviewer or I will be forced to bring your lack of conduct to wider attention. It's really not that much effort. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 21:57, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Due to the lack of attention I have (and what Twinkle1990 said, I’d have no choice but to fail it.) Brachy08 _(Talk) 22:53, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]