This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Judaism Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Jewish history High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jewish history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Jewish history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Jewish historyWikipedia:WikiProject Jewish historyTemplate:WikiProject Jewish historyJewish history-related articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Christianity Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Saints High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Saints, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Saints and other individuals commemorated in Christian liturgical calendars on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SaintsWikipedia:WikiProject SaintsTemplate:WikiProject SaintsSaints articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Bible Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Religion Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

I visited the page of Amos here in Wikipedia in hopes that it will help me for one of my projects, but it turned out that it didn't have the information I needed. Can someone add in more information about his teachings perhaps that will help not only me but also other people? Thanks! ---PrettyPetite^Talk 06:53, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The year given as the start of Amos' 'prophetic career' (750BC) is not consistent with either the best estimates for the 'earthquake' (c. 760BC) during Uzziah's reign (791-740BC), nor does it fall within the reign of Jeroboam of Israel (793-753BC). Can someone provide a quote from the cited source, or provide any other justification for why 750BC has been given despite more likely reckonings?!--Jeffro77 (talk) 06:36, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Because no one answered your question in three years, I have replaced the 750 date with 760-755, and added a citation indicating near-unanimous scholarly support for that date. The source is a book by InterVarsity Press, which I'm sure would raise eyebrows with some scholars, but given the claim about near-unanimity of scholarship on this topic, I went ahead. If anyone wants to repeat the same information from another source, feel free. But I felt comfortable including it because this doesn't seem to be a controversial question. Alephb (talk) 01:57, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

InterVarsity Press is a very reputable scholarly publisher, and its inclusion in beneficial. Ross.woods (talk) 06:54, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This article contains at least a few sentences lifted from the entry on "Amos" written by Karl Budde, Kaufmann Kohler, and Louis Ginzberg, in the Jewish Encyclopedia (http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/1423-mos). For example, this passage has been copied over, more or less unchanged: "Amos' attitude marks a turning-point in the development of Old Testament prophecy. It is not mere chance that Hosea, Isaiah (ch. vi.), Jeremiah, Ezekiel, and almost all of the prophets who are more than unknown personages to whom a few prophetical speeches are ascribed, give first of all the story of their special calling. All of them thereby seek to protest against the suspicion that they are professional prophets, because the latter discredited themselves by flattering national vanities and ignoring the misdeeds of prominent men." Though the Encyclopedia is in the public domain, it still seems a little odd that it is merely cited as a reference. Is there some convention for crediting that Encyclopedia properly? Omphaloscope talk 15:58, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]