This article was nominated for deletion on 12 February 2018. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers. Pakistan Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ashir Azeem. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160414182943/http://www.magtheweekly.com/27feb-04mar2016/interview.asp to http://www.magtheweekly.com/27feb-04mar2016/interview.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:53, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Störm: The edit about his recent job qualifies as a piece of trivia which might be suitable for "Personal life" section, but is not significant for WP:LEAD per MOS:LEADBIO and MOS:OPENPARABIO. His occupation as a truck driver is not what contributed to his notability. For it to be included in the opening lead, it would need to meet WP:CONTEXTMATTERS and other guidelines namely, which it doesn't in this case:

• MOS:LEADBIO: The lead section must summarise the life and works of the person with due weight... make sure the lead correctly reflects the entirety of the article... What is most recent is not necessarily what is most noteworthy: new information should be carefully balanced against old, with due weight accorded to each.
• MOS:OPENPARABIO: '...the opening paragraph should establish notability, neutrally describe the person, and provide context... The noteworthy position(s) the person held, activities they took part in, or roles they played; Why the person is notable.
• WP:BALASP: An article should not give undue weight to minor aspects of its subject... For example, discussion of isolated events, criticisms, or news reports about a subject may be verifiable and impartial, but still disproportionate to their overall significance to the article topic. This is a concern especially in relation to recent events that may be in the news.
• WP:NOTNEWS: Wikipedia considers the enduring notability of persons and events. While news coverage can be useful source material for encyclopedic topics, most newsworthy events do not qualify for inclusion. For example, routine news reporting of announcements, sports, or celebrities is not a sufficient basis for inclusion in the encyclopedia. While including information on recent developments is sometimes appropriate, breaking news should not be emphasized or otherwise treated differently from other information.
• WP:LEAD: The lead serves as an introduction to the article and a summary of its most important contents..
• Other guidelines for reference: WP:RECENTISM, WP:SUMMARY (the lead contains a quick summary of the topic's most important points...) and WP:DUE.

Thanks, Mar4d (talk) 19:30, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]