Information icon Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Asia Television to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you.

How about a List of ATV programmes[edit]

Since there is a list for TVB programmes, how about one for ATV programmes to rival that list as I know of a few imported programmes that has not being mentioned on this page which was shown on the channel, they were Initial D, Macross, Kamen Rider Series. Also when I was young, I was then living in HK, ATV used to show Cantonese dubs of The A Team, Dukes of Hazzard and Knight Rider WilliRennen 14.34 1 Mar 2006 (utc)

That is absolutely not needed. ATV hardly has any good programmes (other than that series about the insurance industry recently, and even that has extremely poor ratings), and most of the programmes it makes are forgotten pretty quickly. Wikipedia is not a name storage facility for D-Rated programmes. Let's keep the godawful list that it will turn out to be out of Wikipedia. Arbiteroftruth 21:33, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Very interested to know that AVT dosen't as none of my relatives in Hong Kong watch ATV in the evening :), lets face it, there are too many list pages in Wikipedia! WilliRennen

Has the quality of ATV programming really fallen to such a low level? When I was in HK (around the time Macross was aired) I and all my anime-watching friends watch almost only the anime from ATV (complaints to the quality of their dubbing notwithstanding); the TVB offerings then were much more inferior.—Gniw (Wing) 00:30, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism[edit]

it's said in Critcism that viewing figures for ATV Home have fallen sharply. I know that ATV's is extremely much smaller than TVB, but i think it's been the case since very very very long time ago. Does it really get even worse than before? Any citation?

I have heard from someone that at one time, ATV's rating fell to 0 pts. for one show (note: in HK, 1 rating point=approx. 65,000 people). But alas, my memory is not a good source of citation here. Can anyone confirm that? Arbiteroftruth 04:31, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Though ATV programmes are usually much less popular than TVB ones, their ratings rarely fell to 0 pts. Usually they are around 15-20 pts, in my memory. - Alexander the Mans 16:29, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't that a bit high, Alex? TVB gets at least 20 pts. even for their crappist programmes. Wouldn't 4-6 pts. be much a much more realistic estimate? I was flipping through some very old magazine and I got that figure. Arbiteroftruth 22:57, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Current ATV Logo 2.jpg[edit]

Image:Current ATV Logo 2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:23, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RTV[edit]

I am moving all the RTV info to its own page. It is becoming too confusing for all the historical pages linking to Rediffusion and double-directing to ATV. Benjwong 04:00, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:ATV current logo.jpg[edit]

Image:ATV current logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 03:32, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ATV World Needs its own page[edit]

Just like TVB Pearl, ATV World should have its own page. TheAsianGURU (talk) 21:51, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"ATV" or "aTV"?[edit]

"ATV" and "aTV" are used inconsistently in the article. Should this be corrected? XP1 (talk) 07:36, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Agree a hatnote would be good but I can find no suitable target. Andrewa (talk) 15:07, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Asia Television Limited → Asia Television – Per WP:NCCORP: "The legal status suffix of a company (such as Inc., plc, LLC, and those in other languages such as GmbH, AG, and S.A.) is not normally included in the article title (for example, Microsoft Corporation, Nestlé S.A., Aflac Incorporated, and Deutsche Post AG).". Timmyshin (talk) 16:31, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Asia Television. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ((Sourcecheck))).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:41, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Asia Television. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:03, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge with Asia Television Digital Media Limited[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was to merge into article. Wefk423 (talk) 11:46, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant and advertising info, also talking about the same company. Wefk423 (talk) 15:42, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think there may be a possibility that non-disclosure might be involved in Asia Television Digital Media Limited. Pyxis Solitary 09:48, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Pyxis Solitary: I agree. I have also considered requesting a speedy deletion for its advertising content (WP:G11). But still decided to create a discussion to merge to the main article of the company. What do you think? Its also a problematic article with lots of issues. –Wefk423 (talk) 11:27, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Agree that if content is going to remain it should be merged. But I also think there's something about it that just doesn't feel right. Pyxis Solitary 11:32, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It seems that Asia Television Digital Media Limited is the new name for the company Asia Television so I support the merger of the two articles. I have removed the spammy text from Asia Television Digital Media Limited as per WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:46, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Categories