This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing: Networking Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Networking task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

2015.01.03: Someone disputes the neutrality of this article, can someone point out what part is in dispute? Ed

A link to a Freewhere BACnet utility was removed as spam on April 18th 2007... I believe that this is a useful link as it points to one of the only free BACnet explorer like utilities out there. It does come from a commercial site but they are not charing for it so how is it spam?

• Freeware BACnet Explorer

Chipkin does not charge for a limited sample of what the utility can do, but does charge is you want the full version or to use it in commercial applications. This link appears to be nothing more then an advertisement to me and I would be surprised if funvill was not an employee or closely affiliated with Chipkin. SoManySpammers 21:13, 1 May 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The article talks about Conformance Classes under "Conformance Classes and the Device PICS".

The concept of conformance classes is obsolete. It is not part of the standard 135-2004.

The new concept is BIBB (BACnet Interoperable Building Blocks) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.64.72.252 (talk) 14:06, 14 July 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image:BACnetLargeLogo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:26, 31 May 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The outgoing links such as see also do not add value to people looking for information on bacnet. They seem to suggest that this page is a switchboard for members of various bacnet user groups and bacnet developers. That is not the intention of this (or any other ) Wikipedia article. Wikipedia exists to provide accurate information for readers who wish to learn about a subject. I will remove links in a few weeks time unless someone joins this discussion and argues persuasively that these outgoing links are consistent with Wikipedia’s requirements which can be read at “What Wikipedia is not” – specifically read “Wikipedia is not a mirror or a repository of links, images, or media files” which specifically says wiki is not “Mere collections of public domain or other source material”. EdwinBtys (talk) 15:43, 25 March 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The link to Brightcore is a link to a page which has information about a minor commercial product and does not add value to this article. EdwinBtys (talk) 15:47, 25 March 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Does anyone have any objections to the removal of the link spam on the article page? EdwinBtys (talk) 13:10, 1 April 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Since no-one disagrees I am going to remove the links.EdwinBtys (talk) 13:41, 8 April 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This section of the article is useful for people interested in testing but doesnt provide information on bacnet. If you are interested then please make a specific page and move the text. I am going to remove the section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pchipkin (talk • contribs) 14:15, April 13, 2010

Reference #2 BACnet protocol June, 1987, in Nashville, Tennessee is a dead link (404) . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.177.125.219 (talk) 14:34, 27 May 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on BACnet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070226071646/http://tc14.ashraetcs.org/pdf/tc14-04a.pdf to http://tc14.ashraetcs.org/pdf/tc14-04a.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:36, 13 July 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Uploaded a PDF version of the minutes of the inaugural committee meeting from 1987. Hmn2 (talk) 19:51, 6 August 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]