External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bhayandar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ((Sourcecheck))).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:51, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Line about school[edit]

User:Bongan please selfrevert your removal city articles do contain such details in a line or two. Please check other geo articles if you are not aware. --DBigXrayᗙ 08:45, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think school notable list section no need detail explanation like eg:- in this page Kalyan#Schools, @DBigXray: please recommended me geo articles page which I am not aware.Bongan® →TalkToMe← 09:16, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@DBigXray:Thnaks for eg. but its a Education section (not a notable list section) and show info. about more than 1 institutions in section. this copy paste edit from school article page show about 1 institutions details added in school notable list section in geo article more than geo info. I think other pages not show education info not more than geo info. Bongan® →TalkToMe← 10:23, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
User:Bongan then rename the section to Education and restore. If there is only 1 school then it does nt mean it has to be removed, you are welcome to add more schools in the area but do not remove saying there is only 1 school. In my opinion, this is not something that should be removed from the article. Please use Template:Citation needed instead of removing non controversial information from Geography articles.--DBigXrayᗙ 11:19, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
User:Bongan I would also request you to self revert and restore the content you have removed from many articles citing lack of sources. It is better to put citation needed tag because new editors are not aware of all the rules.--DBigXrayᗙ 11:23, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Removed contain archive in page article's history, Removed contain are hoax, advertisement, Copyvio from Self-published sites and etc If not add back with a Source not a cn tag. if its not a hoax, advertisement, Copyvio from Self-published sites and etc. it will restore soon by me or other user with ref..
1 school short detail already added no one removed who say? but u replacing with and big article from short one, detail about only 1 school in notable list section. Main point is notable list section not an article section, if there is more than 1 institution than its good to be(Education/School section) or vice versa. Other Geography article page Education section show big detail about many institution in Geography article page and this page have only 1 school in this Geography place. but it not good to be look like an 1 school article page (Like this) rather than Geography article. Bongan® →TalkToMe← 18:20, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
lets other user decide which version are perfect.
  • User:Bongan I am unable to understand your broken english comment above. I am guessing that you have a problem with 1 school. Well there is no rule that says you cannot create an Education or a School section with one school. Others can add more if it is possible, "But it is inappropriate to remove simply saying it is a "small para".
  • Secondly based on your edit history you have been removing large amount of content from Geographical articles. If you find a promotional content, you should remove but removing large amount of content instead of adding Citation needed tag is not right. please read the page WP:CHALLENGE to understand when to remove and when to add CN tag. I have explained enough. Hope you will understand what I am trying to convey to you and stop this. --DBigXrayᗙ 18:39, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I have no problem with 1 school. I not saying Education or a School section cannot create its already created and no one removed. there is only 1 school no need paragraph short info. is enough in notable list section if there is more than 1 institutions than create paragraph and notable list section convert to a Education or a School section. My opinon your prev. edit copy paste from school main page, school paragraph look bigger than Geography paragraph (prev. ver. look like school article page not a Geography article page) I hope u understand my point. Bongan® →TalkToMe← 19:51, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
User:Bongan Please see WP:INDENT and follow it correctly. It does not matter if education is smaller than Geography section or not. That is not a sufficient reason to delete the Education section. yes there is a need for a paragraph for 1 school. A one line or 2 line description of the school is perfectly normal. See WP:DUE.--DBigXrayᗙ 20:06, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
But where I am deleted the Education section(false claims) prepare long para to short.Bongan® →TalkToMe← 20:17, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ok User:Bongan, you said that you dont want Education section here so I said that. You have removed the description of the school. This is useful information and is needed in the article. SInce it gives the reader an idea about the education infrastructure in this geographical area. The mention of church is also entirely relevant. --DBigXrayᗙ 20:26, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
the link already provided by me so many timed pls see above long para to short. I am supporting on notable list section/School section short ver.
eg:- links
I am not removed hole section just prepares like notable list section short i.e School section and I think reader also understand short ver. Bongan® →TalkToMe← 06:54, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
User:Bongan Yes, the reader can understand short version but there is no justifiable reason given by you to remove the content here, That content is useful for the Geo article and should be restored. You cannot remove content, simply by saying that you dont like it, there has to be a strong reason for its removal. Please self revert and restore the content. --DBigXrayᗙ 21:12, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
prepare like notable list section mean Like this this page short ver.. I am not say I dont like it Just try to saying no need Big para leave it as School notable list section Short ver. I am given other reason too you replay with WP:DUE and others, School pages created with self source and I not think this school place exit in Bhayandar. big ver direct copy paste from page linked self source page. I hope u understand my point. Thank you. Bongan® →TalkToMe← 06:54, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
User:Bongan Why are you unable to understand this simple thing that Notable list is not a standard way of writing a wikipedia article, If you want to create list of schools create a seperate article with title as LIST OF SCHOOLS in BHAYANDAR, Wikipedia is WP:NOTYELLOWPAGE. Standard way of writing a Education section is by writing a paragraph as mentioned in the GA article WP:GA examples, Please see GA level articles like Coimbatore#Education, Kochi#Education, Madurai#Education, and more here [3][4]. Do you see a list or do you see a paragraph ? They do not use List, So do not use list and do not force others to use list. --DBigXrayᗙ 08:49, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • And it is very easy to check that this school indeed exists. see [5]   [6]    [7] these links. Instead of adding sources, or [citation needed] Cn tags you are removing content from article and making them stubs. this is not helpful to improve the article. I would request you to only remove controversial information. Try to WP:Copy edit the text instead of removing them. --DBigXrayᗙ 08:55, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Categories