Metalworking C‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metalworking, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Metalworking on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalworkingWikipedia:WikiProject MetalworkingTemplate:WikiProject MetalworkingMetalworking articles C This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.  Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Just a comment in passing. This article is rather focussed on US practices, and mainly those currently in use. What about a more worldwide view, and more historical practices, eg when boilers were riveted together? (Boilers for heritage transport applications still are, in most cases.) -- EdJogg (talk) 16:26, 19 January 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Different scope. Boilers are past their heyday, so most US boilermakers are ironworkers who are working on other sorts of steel fabrication, other than boilers or indeed iron.

If we want an article on "the making of boilers", then that could be international, but it should be quite separate from this article. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:17, 30 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Ten years passed (well, short of a few days ;) - nothing changed. I'd recommend to acknowledge the fact - that the word and the specific trade behind it are, indeed, a North American specialty - and remove the tag. Elsewhere the same trade may or may not have a distinct name, or may not exist as a trade at all, being split between different established trades (I myself come from a latter-type culture). That's perfectly normal - each culture finds its own ways of shaping and organizing its labor force; it just happens differently. Retired electrician (talk) 10:07, 16 January 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Are you sure that's a statue of a boilermaker? To me, it looks like George C. Scott portraying George S. Patton in the epic 1970 film Patton. If I had more power here, I'd check that out. Alas, I am but a lowly lay WP contributor and lack the political torque to affect real change, photo-authenticity-wise. I have also—and this is no coincidence, I assure you—just consumed a boilermaker of the mixological variety, which has not helped my judgment regarding Discussion posts, but which does seem to have enhanced my powers of photo suspicion. – AndyFielding (talk) 09:47, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Patton had trousers. I'd agree though that it conveys nothing to this article. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Boilermaker. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140602213327/https://www.asme.org/products/codes-standards/b311-2012-power-piping to https://www.asme.org/products/codes-standards/b311-2012-power-piping

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:56, 23 July 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]