This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
- I do hope that this is not another CPH ad. This is becoming tiresome. -Rekleov 22:04, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This is yet another CPH ad, and left without attribution. Whoever is dropping these materials all over the Wikipedia, please stop. This is becoming tiresome, and does nothing for the reputation of CPH --- especially when useful and relevant information is blasted away. -Rekleov 22:13, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This latest replacement of the BoC page is yet another CPH ad, and left without attribution. Whoever is dropping these materials all over the Wikipedia, please stop. This is becoming tiresome, and does nothing for the reputation of CPH --- especially when useful and relevant information is blasted away. -Rekleov 22:13, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
"This latest replacement of the BoC page is yet another CPH ad"
The comment is wrong and inappropriate. It implies that Concordia Publishing House is "placing ads" on Wikipedia, which is not the case. The assertion is factually in error and as such misleading to readers. I would appreciate if it stayed off this site.
I am restoring the deleted material from this talk page. On Wikipedia it is not the practice to remove another's comments on a talk page unless it is to put it on an archive page. Please leave the comments of someone else. Respond to them, but do not remove them. drboisclair 00:09, 19 April 2006 (UTC)