This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Fashion Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Hawaii Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hawaii, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hawaii on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HawaiiWikipedia:WikiProject HawaiiTemplate:WikiProject HawaiiHawaii articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Casual Friday, the rock band : Does anyone know if this band is still around? quick google search showed their official webpage was casualfriday.tk, which looks like it isn't up. Atreys 16:56, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

This article needs sourcing. - CobaltBlueTony 13:50, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

I've gone ahead and added that it needs sourcing in the article itself. In addition I've placed fact tags around paragraphs I've positive are correct (but they still need sourced) and have also added some dubious tags around paragraphs I find doubtful. Those in particular really need a source and of not forthcoming such sentences should be deleted. Jon 19:05, 15 June 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Why is that section about Target there? What's so special about it? --AndreKR (talk) 10:02, 1 June 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

So, this article is pro-Casual Friday without seeing anything negative about having employees show up to work dressed like schoolkids in jungle gym, eh? Just wondering. I don't invest in businesses that aren't formal and dressed for success, but that's me. 24.48.160.108 (talk) 16:09, 10 June 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Neutral point of view (NPOV) is a fundamental Wikimedia principle and a cornerstone of Wikipedia. All Wikipedia articles and other encyclopedic content must be written from a neutral point of view, representing fairly, proportionately, and as far as possible without bias, all significant views that have been published by reliable sources. This is non-negotiable and expected of all articles and all editors.

Wikipedia is not a place for you to advocate your distaste for casual business dress. Your personal opinion that casual dress amounts to "schoolkids in jungle gym" or that you don't invest in businesses that adopt casual wear is irrelevant to the article and to Wikipedia.Acsenray (talk) 19:12, 25 August 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wikipedia is not a place to describe one person's experience and attitude, but it is a place to acknowledge and document the fact that there is criticism of Casual Friday and its spread to the rest of the work week. Afeldstein (talk) 00:30, 5 January 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Then find several citations that support this, and edit them in. Wikipedia is a place for WP:RS. 209.6.84.12 (talk) 07:57, 13 October 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I was trying to find information about the Japanese Cool Biz campaign by searching for "coolbiz" and was redirected in here. I think that's a mistake. Marc Dequènes (Duck) (talk) 19:59, 16 October 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]