GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 01:34, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Taking a look in a few hours...you know the drill....Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:34, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks again. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:34, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

1. Well written?:

Prose quality:
Manual of Style compliance:

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:

References to sources:
Citations to reliable sources, where required:
No original research:

3. Broad in coverage?:

Major aspects:
Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:

Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?

No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA): pretty concise...I suspect will be expanded once the Amazon series comes out in September...hehehe Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:44, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I'd thought we'd struggle with sources but the games certainly tipped that one. And the new series will turn him into a whole new character, probably! Chiswick Chap (talk) 06:35, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]