GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Cemetery of San Fernando/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 11:15, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@The Rambling Man Thank you for taking your time to review this article, if you have any question please ping me over here. CommanderWaterford (talk) 11:24, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

That's about a third of the way through. I'm afraid this is in desperate need of a copyedit by a native English speaker, and preferably someone who knows about this kind of subject. I note there are plenty of unreferenced claims in the material I'm yet to review and I'm troubled by the fact this clearly hasn't been read through with so many issues (especially like the numbers appearing after full stops sporadically). I am reluctant to quick-fail but unless I see a vast improvement of the whole article, not just the portion I've reviewed, then I will have no option. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 12:33, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@The Rambling Man Thanks for your time, that was one of my very first ones (almost forgotten honestly) and indeed it seem to need a CE, I will raise a request. CommanderWaterford (talk) 12:43, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I suggest this nomination is withdrawn until it's ready for renomination. Peer review can take quite a while. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 13:56, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@The Rambling Man I am in contact with a Guild CE if he finds time the next 2-3 days, I am waiting for a response. If he does not find time this week I will withdraw it for sure. CommanderWaterford (talk) 19:09, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Novem Linguae agreed to do a CE this week, so please let it be on hold so far. CommanderWaterford (talk) 08:00, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
CommanderWaterford ok, it's been a week now, what's the progress here? The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 12:22, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@The Rambling Man ? As far as I see you already put this on failed some days ago so there has been no rush for us to make any progress, the article needs indeed a lot of work before getting it to GA Status. CommanderWaterford (talk) 12:24, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
CommanderWaterford not at all. You told me it was on hold. I didn't fail it. Please check this. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 12:28, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@The Rambling Man Interesting because I received from Legobot a failed Message (which I already archived). Anyway - right now this article cannot being treated as GA at all, unfortunately. CommanderWaterford (talk) 15:35, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That is strange. It's now (correctly) failed. Do not remove the GAN template without replacing it with a pass/fail template please. The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 16:50, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copy edit[edit]

Hello all. Sorry for all the clarify and copy-edit-inline tags. That is how I am leaving my notes for CommanderWaterford, who is trying to bring this article to GA level. The tags should be resolved soon. Please pardon my tag bombing. –Novem Linguae (talk) 11:27, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]