Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: NegativeMP1 (talk · contribs) 21:15, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Soon. I have very limited knowledge of Pokémon, so when I review this article, bear with me. λ NegativeMP1 21:15, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah that's fine. Thanks for taking this nomination! PrimalMustelid (talk) 13:48, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Still intend on reviewing this, gonna need a little bit longer though. λ NegativeMP1 06:28, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Review[edit]

None of the quickfail criteria were met, so skipping straight to the actual review.

Prose[edit]

• "They were created by Ken Sugimori and were introduced in the video games Pokémon Black and White." → "Designed by Ken Sugimori, they were introduced in the video games Pokémon Black and White."
  • Implemented. PrimalMustelid (talk) 23:39, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Link first prose instance of Ken Sugimori
  • Done. PrimalMustelid (talk) 23:39, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Change infobox caption to "Promotional artwork"
  • Well, I am following other Pokémon species pages for Wikipedia, and they go by "[Pokémon] artwork by Ken Sugimori." Is that still problematic? PrimalMustelid (talk) 23:39, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Any more development information on the species?
  • Yeah that's it, the Pokémon franchise isn't exactly known for covering conceptions of most Pokémon. PrimalMustelid (talk) 23:39, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• There are two different methods of stating "Fire and Ghost type" in the article, with one having a "-" after fire. Use one or the other for consistency.
  • I think fixed, but I might be misunderstanding. PrimalMustelid (talk) 23:39, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• You mention lore in the lead and reception sections, yet don't give a brief overview of the lore of the species. If its restricted to a brief overview, it should be covered by WP:PLOTCITE and not require a citation.
  • Changed to "based on in-game entries of it." PrimalMustelid (talk) 23:39, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• "Chandelure also made an appearance in several Pokémon anime episodes" italicize the name of the anime.
  • Done. PrimalMustelid (talk) 23:39, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• The paragraph of some outlets criticizing the species needs to be extended. You mention in the lead the species was met with mixed reception, yet don't elaborate on how exactly it was mixed.
  • Expanded. PrimalMustelid (talk) 23:39, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Media[edit]

Only one image is used in the whole article, and it's the species itself. Obviously a necessary image with justified fair use.

Sources[edit]

I'll do a spotcheck soon. Spot checked 11, 21, 36, and 39. They all seem to verify the content they are cited to, so pass on this end.

Final comments[edit]

Putting this on hold to give you time to address the comments posted above. λ NegativeMP1 01:33, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I'll get to finishing the implementations of the review's suggestions in two days, thanks for reviewing! PrimalMustelid (talk) 01:41, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

NegativeMP1 And I addressed your suggestions so far, let me know if there's any lingering issues. PrimalMustelid (talk) 23:39, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]