GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 20:08, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·


All that's needed are some copy tweaks, and you'll have a GA. 7-day hold to Adog. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 20:44, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copy changes[edit]

Lead[edit]

History[edit]

  • ✅ Fixed and changed all the grammatical errors here (for our sanity, I would hope the train would clear obstacles after the test and I see how that comma is important haha). Adog (TalkCont) 02:33, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ride experience[edit]

Characteristics[edit]

Reception[edit]

  • I'd paraphrase the first quote, drop the comma after it, and add a comma after "launch". It might look like this: He was also surprised that, despite "three head-snapping launches", the ride was "curiously slow" at times, though he still praised the final launch, stating, "[It] sends you over a seemingly small parabola, a stomach-flipping surprise ending." (Note the comma inside since we're quoting a full sentence.)
  • ✅ I really appreciate how you articulated the last quote, looks a lot better. Fixed the remaining problems here. Adog (TalkCont) 02:33, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Other[edit]

  • Before I knock this all out tonight, I want to thank you for taking another review for me and my grammar mistakes! I'll make sure to review some policies more closely. :) Adog (TalkCont) 23:43, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Sammi Brie: Alrighty, everything should mostly be done. I again appreciate the review and the grammatical fixes. You really can see the difference! Let me know if anything else should be done or if you have any more guides I should look into. Adog (TalkCont) 02:33, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Very glad. The one thing I'll note while passing this is that I know Metro is generally unreliable; however, in this case, we have an interview with Rose, and it is mostly written by him in first person. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 03:24, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.