GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Otuọcha (talk · contribs)

Reviewer: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 19:07, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

A lot of work, but it can be done. Be careful that in rewording you don't introduce new errors. (Disappointing, on a personal note, to find that she's a TERF, but that's well beyond the scope of this review.) Ping me when done or if you have questions. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 07:56, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know? If you fancy doing so, I always have plenty of GA nominees to review. Just look for the all-uppercase titles in the Television section. Reviews always appreciated.

Copy changes[edit]

Lead[edit]

 Done

Early life[edit]

Education[edit]

Writing career[edit]

Lectures[edit]

Views[edit]

 Done: used and paraphrased!

Awards[edit]

Sourcing and spot checks[edit]

Spot checks[edit]

Copyvio/CLOP[edit]

Media[edit]

This article has four pieces of media: two images and two sound clips.

Encouragement: Add alt text to images for accessibility.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.