External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Concept drift. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:44, 11 August 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Concept drift. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:34, 17 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Merge from Drift (data science)[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
To merge on the grounds of overlap. Klbrain (talk) 10:58, 12 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

As far as I can tell, the new article Drift (data science) is not about a separate concept. It might slightly focus on particular areas, but it's essentially the same? I suggest merging it here. MarioGom (talk) 11:19, 1 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Speedy close The article was tagged "under construction. This is none of your business to remove not your tag. "Not edited for several hours" is not valid argument. People sleep, eat, shit, etc. you know. I am not a rat with an electrode in my brain to constantly click the keyboard. Loew Galitz (talk) 18:23, 1 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Loew Galitz: Feel free to keep the "under construction tag", my merge proposal still stands. Please, do not remove it unilaterally. Best, MarioGom (talk) 16:26, 11 April 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Actually, It could be anyone's business the template itself says if [...] has not been edited in several hours, please remove this template. Happy Editing--IAmChaos 04:56, 5 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I think the article drift (data science) is describing several distince phenomena and should be split into their corresponding articles (or where that stuff fits best). One of the different meanings is the described in Concept drift. Biggerj1 (talk) 09:56, 17 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

+1 for split and merge Biggerj1 (talk) 17:17, 17 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Categories