GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Z1720 (talk · contribs) 01:39, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


I will be conducting a review within the next few hours. Please ping me if you have any questions or concerns. Z1720 (talk) 01:39, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

Here are some comments:

In the review, I marked some categories as "?" because I think I will have to reevaluate when more information is added. Great places to find additional sources are WP:LIBRARY, [www.archive.org archive.org], and databases provided by your local library. Let me know if you have any questions. Z1720 (talk) 02:10, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]