Italy Start‑class Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles Start This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Football: Italy Start‑class Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles Start This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Italian football task force (assessed as High-importance).

I wonder if it might get too confusing to show double-leg home and away results on the regular '16TeamBracket' format. What another format be possible? Juveboy 15:55, 28 August 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Round of 16

Team 1	Agg.Tooltip Aggregate score	Team 2	1st leg	2nd leg
Internazionale (1)	?-?	Messina (17)	? -?	?-?
Empoli (8)	?-?	Genoa (41)	? -?	?-?
Chievo (4)	?-?	Reggina (13)	? -?	?-?
Palermo (5)	?-?	Sampdoria (12)	? -?	?-?
Roma (2)	?-?	Triestina (34)	? -?	?-?
Parma (7)	?-?	Napoli (39)	? -?	?-?
Milan (3)	?-?	Brescia (30)	? -?	?-?
Livorno (6)	?-?	Arezzo (27)	? -?	?-?

Juveboy 01:10, 7 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I think tree form and table form both should used. Matt86hk talk 05:38, 7 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

if someone can set this up without the 'two flag' columns, it would be very much appreciated. Maybe you can then replace the tree thing under the Round of 16 heading, which I think can't work given the double-leg system that will be used Juveboy 12:53, 21 September 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Could someone please check why there are 67 'Runners-up' yet only 59 cups have been awarded. Juve2000 01:18, 18 July 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image:TIM Cup Logo 2006-2007.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:59, 30 November 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The following section, which currently says:

"The tournament is known for its low attendances, mainly because most teams consider the tournament of low importance and do not field their best line-up, especially after the abolition of the UEFA Cup Winners' Cup. While some top clubs may average over 50,000 for league games, often these same clubs will attract crowds of around 1,000 for Coppa Italia matches. Many domestic cups elsewhere in Europe attract larger crowds. It is often in the final, where the UEFA Europa League spot is up for grabs, that larger crowds attend the games."

This section is not really giving an objective assessment of the cup, not to mention it makes statements without citation, which is not just even close to being true (the only 1000 crowd for the teams that usually have 50.000).

I see what the initiate author wanted to say by this section, but it just comes out way to exaggerated and also the cup's somewhat lack of high prestige probably doesn't need to be addressed as much anyway.

It is true that many other nations regard their domestic cups with higher prestige, but even in many countries where the cup have been regarded with very high prestige (like the English regard their FA Cup), the prestige appear to have fallen a bit as of lately and if you for instance compare the amount of "reserve" players on the starting line-ups in the initial rounds of the respective cups the top teams use, I find it to be fairly similar, maybe even more "reserve" players in the FA Cup 3rd and 4th round actually.

This taken into consideration and that Coppa Italia appear to at least not have lost in prestige in recent years, if anything actually gained a bit more than it had some years ago I feel this section needs to be re-written or probably even better: Completely removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.105.200.121 (talk) 22:06, 12 January 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Does anyone know the rules regarding which team is selected to play at home in the single-game rounds (First Round through to Quarter-finals) in the new format? If so, could you please write something up on the page....with thanks.Juve2000 (talk) 19:22, 13 December 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Coppa Italia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add ((cbignore)) after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add ((nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot)) to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080228221940/http://www.lega-calcio.it/comun/0708/cu139.pdf to http://www.lega-calcio.it/comun/0708/cu139.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:15, 9 January 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Coppa Italia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100326002537/http://en.calcioalpallone.com/coppa-italia/schedule-scores/ to http://en.calcioalpallone.com/coppa-italia/schedule-scores/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:50, 12 August 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Can someone please split the list of champions into two columns? Juve2000 (talk) 05:26, 13 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

 Done. Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 12:29, 13 July 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

The English name of the competition is still the "Coppa Italia", or the "TIM Cup", and even if it were to be translated it would be the "Italian Cup" or "Cup of Italy" certainly not the "Italy Cup" which is a literal translation of the Italian name with no consideration for how these competitions are named in English speaking countries. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.46.127.102 (talk) 10:13, 26 April 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copied from my (User:Vaselineeeeeeee) talk page—message from User:BumbleBum about User:Foghe's major edit. Any thoughts?

In my opinion, a significant change has been made to the Coppa Italia article. The list of champions was replaced by a much longer list of every final (single and double legs), which has made the new section too big and has included too much detail. The Coppa Italia is a tournament, not just a final. I would like to know if I am seeing this right, or if you agree with the original edit. I hope a discussion is started (and not an edit war) on this matter.BumbleBum (talk) 01:45, 6 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@BumbleBum: Yes, I see that - personally I think the edit is fine as it gives a bit more context to the wins without it being too much, similar to what we have at Supercoppa Italiana. Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 02:04, 6 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I see your point, but Supercoppa Italiana is a one-off game, while Coppa Italia is a tournament. Tournament pages like UEFA Champions League, NHL Playoffs, NBA Playoffs and NFL Playoffs don't list all the finalists, champions yes. The tournament pages I have listed usually have separate pages for their Finals. I might suggest that the editor create a Super Coppa Finals page.BumbleBum (talk) 03:03, 8 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

New logo -- Ahmed Mohammed Salem Alleswas (talk) 20:24, 13 May 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]